User talk:Geochem8
A beer for you![edit]
|
Cheers ! Welcome to wiki... wishing you luck on your article :) Spongebubble94 (talk) 21:49, 21 February 2017 (UTC) |
Welcome![edit]
Hello, Geochem8, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.
I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.
Handouts
|
|---|
Additional Resources
|
|
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 23:04, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Peer Review[edit]
Hi, I will be reviewing your and Bryochemist's page. It will be either by tonight or early tomorrow morning. Bananabread7 (talk) 18:32, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
Peer Review[edit]
Dear Geochem8,
I think that the subsections under the Geological History section could be changed a bit. The title, being Geological History, does not seem to match with the hypotheses in the subsections. Either the title of the section or the subsections could be changed.
Some sections seem to be lacking citations. For example the whole subsection Gullies lacks citations.
Overall, the article seems to be easy to understand and descriptive without being unnecessarily wordy. It seems to be on a good track to be edited into the main article. Bananabread7 (talk) 00:29, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
Peer Review[edit]
Geochem8,
You've added a substantial amount of information to the article Acidalia Planitia. The way that you've reorganized the sections with mud volcanoes and gullies being part of a larger section about geographical features is logical and will make further expansion of the article easy. I think that having geological history as its own section makes sense but that the introduction to that section could perhaps be slightly longer. This could serve to perhaps make more clear what features of Acidalia Planitia are explained by each of them. I think that removing many of the images of the gullies and the mud volcanoes was appropriate as there were too many of them with no textual explanation. The pictures that you did retain serve well at providing examples of what they look like.
Greysweater (talk) 16:01, 18 April 2017 (UTC)