User talk:George-Washington-did-9-11

March 2018[edit]

Welcome, and thank you for your attempt to lighten up Wikipedia. However, this is an encyclopedia and articles are intended to be serious, so please don't make joke edits, as you did to Architectural designer. Readers looking for accurate information will not find them amusing. If you'd like to experiment with editing, please use the sandbox instead, where you are given a certain degree of freedom in what you write. DBaK (talk) 18:40, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments. Such edits are disruptive, and may appear to other editors to be vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Don't do that. DBaK (talk) 18:44, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. DBaK (talk) 18:44, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Listen it is my freedom to include information, accurate information to be exact. I’m making the public more informed but if you are stoping me it is considered that you want future generations to be stupid and less informed. Unlike like you sir I’m a non conservative. Also this is my message and only I will see it( you too ) so don’t tell me that I’m vandalizing my own messages. I’m not. Thank you and goodbye, please don’t ban me though, I’m not gonna stop adding information to make the sentence either grammatically correct or more informative.

March 2018[edit]

Hello, I'm DisillusionedBitterAndKnackered. I noticed that you made a comment that didn't seem very civil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DBaK (talk) 19:04, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on others again, as you did at User talk:DisillusionedBitterAndKnackered, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Chris Troutman (talk) 19:08, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bishonen | talk 19:11, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Lol[edit]

I see that you were mad that I was ‘vandalizing’ some pages but I wasn’t. Ok at first I was just testing but you came after me like that and it really triggered me, I want to sincerely apologize. I’m sorry. George-Washington-did-9-11 (talk) 19:26, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation[edit]

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/George-Washington-did-9-11, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community. DBaK (talk) 23:15, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]