User talk:George Fergus

Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!)

Here are a few links you might find helpful:

You can sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing ~~~~; our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the Wikipedia Boot Camp, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Image copyright problem with Image:Epguides logo.gif

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Epguides logo.gif. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. The Sunshine Man 16:31, 9 May 2007 (UTC) We're so glad you're here! Perfecto 19:43, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. The thread is COI addition at multiple articles. Thank you. AussieLegend (✉) 17:58, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May 2017

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Æon Flux. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 08:05, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

June 2017

Hello, George Fergus. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies.

While there are links to epguides.com in some Wikipedia articles, because you are the creator of the site, when you add those same links it is likely to be seen as a conflict of interest. Please see the section on advertising and conflicts of interest here. I encourage you to find another way to contribute to Wikipedia. Thanks, BlackcurrantTea (talk) 14:50, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

Sorry, I discovered that someone had created a template here for generating an external link to my website, and the template's description said something about it being "underused". I now realize that I misunderstood what this meant. Mea culpa.George Fergus (talk) 17:49, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I'm glad you understand. It's an uncommon situation in conflict of interest, but occasionally arises. A comparable example might be a researcher adding references to her journal articles or books, appropriately cited, all ducks in a row, the same works I or another anonymous editor might include. Yet because she added her own work, it's problematic.

Neutrality's important here: It's one of the Five Pillars of Wikipedia. So when a possible conflict of interest comes up, or an article becomes slanted in a particular way, we take it seriously.

I hope you can find another area of Wikipedia that interests you. This place is huge, and there are all sorts of things going on that require different skills, knowledge, and inclinations. The hosts of the Teahouse are quite welcoming and may have some suggestions should you want them. If you have any questions for me, you can get my attention by including {{u|BlackcurrantTea}} in a post that you sign with the four tildes (this works with most editor's names - a few have notifications turned off), or by posting on my talk page. Good luck! BlackcurrantTea (talk) 03:59, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, George Fergus. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, George Fergus. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hannah Swensen Mysteries has been accepted

Hannah Swensen Mysteries, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Redirect-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

-Liance^{talk/contribs} 23:08, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]