User talk:Geread

I would suggest that you consider nominating Gery Chico at community WP:GAR as the primary editor contesting a quickfail, noting that any conflict of interest is independent of the quality of the article and that the quality of the article merits a respectable review of the article's merits based upon the WP:WIAGA criteria. I would promptly add support for a full review with no statement about the merits of the article if you notify me of such a nomination. I would suggest removing the news release portion of the tag. I don't think that is valid any longer. Note that you are removing it during the GAR and that it was on the article at the time of the quick fail and that you have removed it.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 06:01, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fix the WP:LEAD and change the header template regarding news story first.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 07:16, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. The article might also benefit from a WP:PR.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 07:17, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Gery Chico[edit]

The article Gery Chico you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Gery Chico for things which need to be addressed. Jezhotwells (talk) 01:46, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA review[edit]

I am personally dissatisfied with the GA reveiw. The failure does not seem to be merited. I would strongly consider requesting a community WP:GAR.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 15:42, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GAR has become a slower process. It now takes about the same amount of time as WP:GAN. I think GAR is procedurally correct in this case.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 13:54, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have some unaddressed concerns at Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Gery Chico/1 that may prevent it from being promoted.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 13:38, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks[edit]

On behalf of WP:CHICAGO, thanks for the extensive effort.

This user helped promote Gery Chico to good article status.

--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 21:07, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]