User talk:Ghostpol

Greetings, and welcome to my profile. I am Ghostpol, and I strive to help rid the internet of bias and empower a platform for truly neutral information to be accessed and exchanged by all here on Wikipedia.

I vehemently oppose systemic partisanship, and aim to prevent the spread and normalisation of information whose sources may have ulterior or deleterious motives. Unfortunately, this is becoming an increasingly difficult challenge in today's internet era.

Nonetheless, I remain committed to undercutting prejudice, bigotry and unencyclopaedic information for as long as I am making edits and revisions to pages wherein I become aware of its presence.

If you have any issue with the integrity or intention of anything I post please don't hesitate to mention it on my talk page and I shall be quick to rectify whatever issue may be present. Please understand that although I am committed to the fair representation of individuals and corporate bodies I will, inevitably, make mistakes from time to time, and will be willing to consider all perspectives in a decorous manner.

Thank you.

Ghostpol, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Ghostpol! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cordless Larry (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:02, 22 August 2020 (UTC)

August 2020

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Gordon de Brouwer. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. S0091 (talk) 17:33, 23 August 2020 (UTC)

New message from S0091

Hello, Ghostpol. You have new messages at S0091's talk page.
Message added 15:20, 12 September 2020 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

S0091 (talk) 15:20, 12 September 2020 (UTC)