User talk:GiordanoOrion

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

GiordanoOrion (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Checkuser needed: I haven't abused multiple accounts or IPs nor breached the policy on meat-puppetry. And even if I did, a block should be preventative, not punitive. How can I prove that I'm not a sock? Please check my contributions, I never intended to disrupt or vandalize Wikipedia. This is a big injustice and I feel censored for exposing my views and opinions that challenges the ideas of others. Please note that even though I don't have any other account, multiple accounts are allowed for legitimate reasons. -- GiordanoOrion (talk) 23:45, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

The behavioural and technical evidence is compelling and your assertion that "even if I did [sock], a block should be preventative, not punitive" has no basis in reality. The "preventative" part is to prevent you, a sock, from editing. Stop trying to tell checkusers and admins how the policies on socking and blocking work. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 23:57, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.