User talk:Giorgio.bonuccelli76

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Giorgio.bonuccelli76, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Teahouse logo

Hi Giorgio.bonuccelli76! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like AmaryllisGardener (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by K.e.coffman were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
K.e.coffman (talk) 02:33, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi K.e.coffman this content is very similar to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XenApp is it an advert too? 04:33,26 October 2018 (UTC) Hi K.e.coffman did you see my message? 10:33,26 November 2018 (UTC) Hi K.e.coffman this content is very similar to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XenApp is it an advert too? 04:33,26 October 2018 (UTC) Hi K.e.coffman did you see my message? 10:33,26 November 2018 (UTC)

Hello, Giorgio.bonuccelli76. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Parallels Remote Application Server".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 21:21, 13 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you @JMHamofor the kind explanation, I am happy with the deletion Giorgio.bonuccelli76 (talk) 10:07, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dedaub LTD (October 6)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Idoghor Melody was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 17:37, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest[edit]

Information icon Hello, Giorgio.bonuccelli76. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Wikishovel (talk) 21:07, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Wikishovel (talk) for sharing conflict of interest (COI) guidelines. I'll do my best to follow them. I don't receive any compensation for my contributions to WIKIPEDIA GiorgioB (talk) 10:49, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @User:Idoghor Melody,

I understand that the initial submission of this page Draft:Dedaub LTD ‎was declined due to a lack of adequately supported reliable sources. I appreciate your focus on ensuring that all information is verified.

However, I'd like to point out that new references have been added to reinforce the credibility of the submission. These sources are highly reputable and speak directly to the expertise and track record of Dedaub in the field of smart contract security and auditing.


The company's significance in the space is substantiated through multiple aspects such as:

Company Legitimacy and Registration: Malta Business Registry, with Company Registration Number C 99606, clearly establishes Dedaub's legal standing.

Expert Publications: Contributions in ACM and ISSTA proceedings like "Elipmoc: advanced decompilation of Ethereum smart contracts" demonstrate the academic prowess of Dedaub's team.

Vulnerability Disclosures and Awards: Reports in reputable outlets like Times of Malta, thedefiant.io, and Finance.Yahoo.com highlight the value Dedaub has added to the blockchain community by discovering critical vulnerabilities.

Client Impact Stories: Coverage in theblock.co, indianexpress.com, and u.today speak to specific vulnerabilities Dedaub has unearthed in widely-used protocols like Uniswap, Multichain, and Poly Network.

Industry Influence: Interviews and podcasts like "Web3 Innovators - Conor Svensson and Yannis Smaragdakis" demonstrate how the industry values Dedaub's founder's contribution.

Given these additional references, I kindly request that you reevaluate the submission. It is crucial for entities that are diligently working to secure the blockchain ecosystem to gain the right visibility to continue to move the field of information security forward.


Thank you for your consideration. GiorgioB (talk) 15:32, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dedaub LTD (October 28)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David Gerard was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
David Gerard (talk) 18:57, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Neville Grech for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Neville Grech is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neville Grech until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Kj cheetham (talk) 14:43, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Giorgio.bonuccelli76

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Alpha3031, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, Dedaub LTD, for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to contest the deletion:

  1. Edit the page
  2. Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
  3. Click the Publish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Alpha3031}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Alpha3031 (tc) 08:58, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]