User talk:GirlishDriver

Welcome[edit]

Welcome!

Hello, GirlishDriver, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like Wikipedia and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! - Ahunt (talk) 11:44, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

March 2020[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bishonen | tålk 17:43, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is a pure attack account, clearly only here to shame/attack, or out people whose politics you dislike. Leaving you on the loose would be a negative for the encyclopedia. Have you edited under any other usernames? Bishonen | tålk 17:44, 15 March 2020 (UTC).[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

GirlishDriver (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Blocked without warning and for a really flimsy reason at thatGirlishDriver (talk) 18:34, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Acroterion (talk) 19:41, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Note from blocking admin: I will leave your appeal to an uninvolved admin, but just point out that removing warnings and then claiming you haven't received any is an interesting tactic.[1] Bishonen | tålk 19:21, 15 March 2020 (UTC).[reply]

Yep, I gave you an only warning and a Discretionary sanctions alert, and you deleted them calling them spam. And it's pretty clear that you aren't here to improve the encyclopedia, but are here for the reasons Bishonen states above. Doug Weller talk 19:25, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I was given a warning for adding a picture (which I didn't do) then for adding a pretty well-known fact to an article. I never returned to the article after my warning and haven't edited anything since. GirlishDriver (talk) 19:37, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You edited Talk:List of whistleblowers about two hours after the warning on Omar (and shortly after you removed all the warnings off your talk page), and it was evidently worthy of being revision-deleted (I suspect because you were outing someone). The claim you "[hadn't] edited anything since" is thus incorrect. —A little blue Bori v^_^v ^{Onward to 2020} 20:01, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Asking about an article in the talk page is not editing. You are lying. GirlishDriver (talk) 21:07, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That's enough. Bishonen | tålk 21:14, 15 March 2020 (UTC).[reply]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

Bishonen | tålk 21:15, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]