User talk:Giuliosavo
Speedy deletion of Caxton-Iseman Capital, LLC[edit]
A tag has been placed on Caxton-Iseman Capital, LLC, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Wikipedia:Business' FAQ for more information.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —Travistalk 20:52, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
December 2007[edit]
Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Caxton-Iseman Capital, LLC. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion. Thank you. —Travistalk 21:00, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Frederick J. Iseman[edit]
A tag has been placed on Frederick J. Iseman requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —Travistalk 21:01, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Caxton-Iseman Capital, LLC[edit]
A tag has been placed on Caxton-Iseman Capital, LLC requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. KingNewbs (talk) 21:28, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Caxton-Iseman Capital, LLC, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.caxton-iseman.com. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 19:37, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Caxton-Iseman Capital, LLC, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Dawn bard (talk) 19:41, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Caxton-Iseman Capital, LLC, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.caxton-iseman.com. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 19:27, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
Caxton-Iseman Capital, LLC[edit]
Please do not continue to recreate this article. It has now been deleted four times by three different admins. This should indicate that the article as it stands is not acceptable to Wikipedia. Please contact me if you have any queries. --John (talk) 19:36, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Frederick J. Iseman[edit]
A tag has been placed on Frederick J. Iseman, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Wikipedia:Business' FAQ for more information.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Mr Senseless (talk) 15:13, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Frederick Iseman, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.belfercenter.org/experts/1330/frederick_iseman.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 21:13, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
- Hello, I have replied to your post at Talk:Frederick Iseman. I will summarize my post here: The main problem with the article is that it appears to be a copy of copyrighted material available on the web. I give an explanation about what to do about that. The second problem is the question of advertising. The best way to handle that is by citing third-party sources that support that this person/company is notable. The third question is one of formatting. That is the easiest to fix and it is also the point of least concern. Please let me know if I can help further. Thanks, Johntex\talk 21:47, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Frederick Iseman, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.belfercenter.org/experts/1330/frederick_iseman.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 15:45, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
February 2008[edit]
Hi, the recent edit you made to Fredrick J. Iseman has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Keilana|Parlez ici 19:25, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
The recent edit you made to Frederick Iseman constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. · AndonicO Hail! 19:29, 15 February 2008 (UTC))
Fredrick J. Iseman[edit]
Hi Giuliosavo. You blanked the page Fredrick J. Iseman, and that was rightly reverted. I guess that the reason was that it is misspelled, so I advise You to use the speedy template {{Db-author}} on the page, for a quicker response. Maybe like this: {{Db-author|rationale=Optional reason will be displayed in red}} – Leo Laursen – ☏ ⌘ 15:02, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
March 2009[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page Rug do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Apparition11 Complaints/Mistakes 19:02, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Rug Decor, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Terrillja talk 16:07, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
May 2009[edit]
Please stop. If you continue to add promotional material to Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Terrillja talk 16:20, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
Sockpuppetry case[edit]
|
You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Giuliosavo for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Terrillja talk 17:14, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
FYI conflict of interest guideline[edit]
If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
- editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
- participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
- linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.
For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Thank you. — Athaenara ✉ 17:23, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
Blocked[edit]
Hello. Per the findings at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Giuliosavo, I have blocked you for 3 days for abusing multiple accounts. Please do not repeat this this or you will be blocked for a longer period. Thank you. PeterSymonds (talk) 10:14, 21 May 2009 (UTC)