Jump to content

User talk:Glen/Archive10

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

User talk:Glen S/Header

Archive
This page has been archived please do not edit it. If you'd like to discuss one of the topics below, do so by clicking here

:o

[edit]

I completely forgot about admin coaching! And somehow it didn't pop up on my watchlist... going there now. Sorry about the delay! riana_dzasta 06:58, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Which template do you mean? I never thought I'd be guilty of that particular Wikicrime! :) riana_dzasta 09:43, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Late Thank You

[edit]

Thank you for helping solve the matter with Doll Graveyard. It was quite a mess and to me you were always fair and neutral, not to mention helpful. Next time I write a movie article, I may check with to see if it has what it needs to be an article here. :) Continue your good work as admin! -WarthogDemon 09:32, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please protect Sunderland AFC

[edit]

The article Sunderland AFC has been persistantly vandalised over the past few weeks by multiple Ip's and users. Well over 20 times, I can see this by its history, I request proctection to the article. I' am Sheogarath, a new user to Wikipedia. But a long term skilled user on Wikipedias sister project Wikiversity. The vandalism has contained constant swearing abuse and offense towards the club. Sheogarath 18:55, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Your 2 cents please! [1]. Thanks mate. Yankees76 22:52, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Done :)  Glen  07:26, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RE:Approval

[edit]

Thanks! Gzkn 10:51, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for unblocking my bot

[edit]

Hi, I saw your block and subsequent unblock of my bot User:PockBot - sorry, I didn't realise I had to add a template on the page saying it was under trial, this is my first bot and I'm trying to do everything right but there's a lot of little rules its difficult to pickup at first! Not a problem that you blocked it, my fault for not having the correct template/flag on the page. Just out of interest, how did you come across or notice the bot's activites? Any thoughts on improvements etc are welcome since its still on trial and can be modified prior to final approval. (could you reply on my user talk page rather than here please?) Many Thanks - PocklingtonDan 14:39, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It popped up on recent changes in the Vandalism Control Network channel, which isnt usual for a bot as all approved bots are hidden from our feed. So I took a look and thought I better block or you'd be killed by the Bots team :)
Sorry again, and wont happen again now :)  Glen  14:49, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Ah OK, thanks. When the trial is over, do you know the correct template to substitute for the "on trial" one? Cheers - PocklingtonDan 14:52, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Forgot to check, I'll do it, thanks, jimfbleak 18:17, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day!

[edit]
Congratulations! It's been... 1.. 2.. 3.. ___(plug # in) years since your First Edit Day, Glen! Have a f-a-n-tastic day and keep up the good work on Wikipedia!

Best of wishes, the Birthday Committee and myself! --lovelaughterlife♥talk? 20:28, 7 December 2006 (UTC) [reply]

Vandalising

[edit]

I apologise for vandalising your propert. Firstly, I have a sister who ruins everything. Secondly I would like to say that I will keep her away from it. This is notfair. i am extremely sorry. I use Wikipedia alot and it is useful. However, this should not be my last warning because I put up some information from my History lesosn today. So this shouldn't have an effect. I am sorry for the damage and troule my sister has brought to you. I will stop this from happening and wil use Wikipedia responsibly.


Kind Regards, Geraldine Steadman.

P.S. if you would like to email me, then please tell me my warnings at beanie94*hotmail.co.uk oonce again, sorry —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 212.32.75.97 (talk) 22:01, 7 December 2006 (UTC).[reply]

Replying on your talk :)  Glen  22:06, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

CheckUser

[edit]

Our little friend is reminding me more and more of some old friends from the past -- the word games, the hair-splittings hinging on precisely which definition of a particular word one chooses to regard as "the" meaning, the pretense that his only interest is in seeing that Wikipedia policies are followed... it may be time for that little check-up. -- Antaeus Feldspar 01:57, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Asking that an article define what is meant by "doctrine" is hardly hair-splitting, because the way it seems to be used in articles like Space opera in Scientology doctrine doesn't match normal use - you know, like the dictionary definition, or Wikipedia's own Doctrine article. Sounds to me like you're trying to find a back-channel way to find a reason to "get rid of" someone who disagrees with you. Gee, just like the Church of Scientology! Highfructosecornsyrup 02:17, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Suspected sockpuppet

[edit]
Of indefinitely banned (per arbcom)
Other possible suspects
Also possible

Heh

[edit]

Sympathy accepted ;) As for CZ, well, all I can say is, you now know why I don't use my last name on Wikipedia - it's completely unpronouncable! :) riana_dzasta 03:26, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day

[edit]

Happy First Edit Anniversary From Randfan

[edit]
Happy First Edit Day, Glen/Archive10, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee, myself, and Bearly541! Congrats for staying with Wikipedia this long. Much too many people create new accounts, do a few minor edits, and just quit. Have a great day! --Randfan


Have a great day! Randfan 20:58, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Good job for staying with us! Keep up the good work. Cheers! :) —Randfan!! 00:52, 15, December of the year Anno Domini 2006m (UTC)
Woohoo!
From me too, Happy First Edit Day mate, congratulations on your achievements and continuing work for Wikipedia. Have a great day, Dfrg.msc 1 . 2 . Editor Review 08:07, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

CU

[edit]

Eat your heart out.[2] Maybe an indef for the sock as WP:SOCK states about vote-stacking, and a week or so for the main? Cheers, Daniel.Bryant [ T · C ] 05:30, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your edit to my talk page

[edit]

Hi, Glen S. The edit you reverted wasn't vandalism. Thanks. It was reverted back. bibliomaniac15 05:47, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wtf?

[edit]

I've found something rather distrubing. Posted a comment on the ANi thread about trix. any ideas? yandman 08:43, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I looked thorugh your subpage showing where she and her sock crossed, but I can't help noticing that in every case where they've been on the same page, it was after Wikipediatrix left. In addition, every time they edited on the same days, one is before the other (by this I mean that there's never trix-syrup-trix-pause, it's always trix-syrup-pause or pause-syrup-trix). Moreover, trix seems to have gone, and the other account is editing. Couldn't this just be a roomate/child/husband of hers who's pestering her, logging in to wikipedia on her/their computer and pissing about? Has anyone tried emailing her to ask? yandman 13:27, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Actually it wasn't in ever case after she left. See my post on ANI. pschemp | talk 15:20, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

PMA controversy?

[edit]

Well, gee, I don't know, I haven't heard of any PMA controversy, who's PMA? (Radiant) 08:48, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Try these links:
Oh, are you being sarcastic? :-) Carcharoth 10:45, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not block whole IP ranges next time

[edit]

Dear Glen,

usually I do not log in to edit in the English Wikipedia. I know about the advantages, but I would like to let you know, that there are many people out there who are doing good edits without logging in. Today I experienced a blocking of my IP. After changing it several times I understood that you were actually blocking an IP-Range that was affecting nearly all German users of one provider that is serving more than 3 mio. users. Now that you know about this I hope you are less strict with blocking such a big IP range in future.

Thank you

Mario —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Mario Behling (talk • contribs) 23:42, 8 December 2006 (UTC).[reply]

sprotect

[edit]

Could you sprotect User:Heimstern. We're actually getting hit with, "I'm gonna get revenge on you" vandals right now. See my talk. -Patstuarttalk|edits 08:15, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to User talk:Pizzahead2

[edit]

I can see why you deleted this page and protected it. But please unprotect for a moment. I'm trying to post a vandalism warning on his page. --AAA! (AAAA • AAAAAAAA) 08:26, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nevermind. I can see you blocked him. Keep up the good work! --AAA! (AAAA • AAAAAAAA) 08:28, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Xiexie

[edit]

Good job reading my mind. I was just about to post a request for protection when you did that. That was pretty much insane: if my count's correct, my page was vandalised sixteen times in a bit more than fifteen minutes. Thanks for protecting the page. Heimstern Läufer 08:31, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

vandal

[edit]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/148.61.216.69

please remove all his changes

i'm new in en.wiki i'm from ru.wiki and only edit

it's my first vandal tracking so may be i'm writing to wrong person... —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 83.237.157.68 (talk) 14:00, 9 December 2006 (UTC).[reply]

RE:For you :)

[edit]

Thank you Glen S. I appreciate it even though I dont agree that I am a legend. Happy editing Rettetast 15:29, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Admin coaching

[edit]

Hi Glen S! I see on the admin coaching status page that you don't have a student right now. Is this correct? If so, would you like a student? I am trying to match people at the admin coaching program with coaches. If you'd like a student, I would place you with User:ShadowHalo. Please let me know. Thanks! --Fang Aili talk 17:44, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for updating your status. No further action is needed right now. Cheers. :) --Fang Aili talk 18:08, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Glens userspace watcher

[edit]

Is Glens userspace watcher (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log) an impostor? He managed to edit your header and watchlist a month ago without any consequences or you noticing and all of a sudden the account made this suspicious edit to your user talk page today. I'm a little stumped by all of this. --  Netsnipe  ►  18:58, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Finally found this. You really should have tagged your alternate account much more clearly instead of using a redirect, but that last trollish edit rang alarm bells over at WP:AIV which led me to block that account and start mass reverting. You're an evil, evil man Glen. --  Netsnipe  ►  19:09, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
You could also check out this log for a dead give-away:
  • 08:23, 6 November 2006 Glen S (Talk | contribs | block) created new account User:Glens userspace watcher
Миша13 19:12, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Adminship

[edit]

Hey, sorry for the extended delay in this reply but certain things can't be helped. As to why it hadn't happened already, I was planning to run at the start of this month. However, due to the events here I'm badly out of touch with wiki (and am really upset that I missed 1 million files rolling up on Commons). As for a admin nomination, I appreciate your offer (and the apparent !vote of confidence on IRC). As I'm just off a 2-week involuntary wikibreak, my mood isn't appropriate to an RfA just now. However, with any luck in a couple of weeks I will be back properly and would be delighted to accept a nom then :)--Nilfanion (talk) 00:49, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Help - sorry! Didn't know what I was doing was wrong...

[edit]

Hi Glen

Thanks so much for your message. Your guidance is useful and thanks for contacting me. However I am confused. I'd really like to include links to a useful site for young people, where the content is directed specifically at them. The sections I have been attempting to add to do not offer this within the content. Is this wrong? The site I'm linking to is not a commercial service. Hope you can help me. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Esther Cameron (talk • contribs) December 1, 2006.

Gracenotes has smiled in your general direction!

[edit]

Gracenotes T § has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile at others by adding {{subst:smile}}, {{subst:smile2}} or {{subst:smile3}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Happy editing!

/memo

[edit]

I got it :) Daniel.Bryant [ T · C ] 08:31, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Psychopaths

[edit]

I see that you almost wiped the slate with the psychopaths article. Is this because you felt the article was bunk or because there was a duplicate article (or something else)? I would like to now before I contribute to that article again. Moomot 17:10, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Idioma-bot

[edit]

Hello! Can you unblock my robot User:Idioma-bot? I get a trail period to use this bot but it is blocked. You blocked it because I only created the user page for bot [3]. I would be very thankfull if you could unblock it. Hugo.arg 20:58, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Mixed martial arts article improvement drive

[edit]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Mixed martial arts is now taking suggestions for the new MMA article improvement drive! Please add your input to decide what our first collaboration should be. VegaDark 21:48, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Corrosiv-O

[edit]

Appears to have been recreated by another sockpuppet. Pass the salt? Zetawoof(ζ) 02:48, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost updated for December 11th.

[edit]
The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery


Volume 2, Issue 50 11 December 2006 About the Signpost
From the editor: New feature
Board of Trustees expanded as three new members are appointed Wikimedia Foundation releases financial audit
Arbitration Committee elections continue, extra seat available Female-only wiki mailing list draws fire
Trolling organization's article deleted WikiWorld comic: "Redshirt"
News and notes: Fundraiser plans, milestones Wikipedia in the News
Features and admins Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:02, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

i-to-i

[edit]

Just read the criteria. do I have to include evidence of articles from major publications that talk about the company within the entry or should I send them to you as proof? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by I-to-i (talk • contribs) 14:37, 12 December 2006 (UTC).[reply]

Thanks for the reply

[edit]

I have asked a quick question at my place. --Justanother 18:20, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What do you make of this?

[edit]

Check out the contributions of Ilunga Shibinda (talk · contribs). Are all the URLs in edit summaries a bit strange or is it just me? Yankees76 18:52, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ignored T4

[edit]

Hey Glen, I won't bother going by AIV as I see yer around and dished out the final warning here. User talk:66.146.118.54 Cheers Khukri (talk . contribs) 19:31, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Because...

[edit]

I am the webmaster for that website and took the photo. It's been updated anyhow. JoshHolloway 19:43, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

/d deletion page

[edit]

Yep, it is nice, when so many pages are deleted and merged it is impossible to find any specific information, even for admins, so that is the way I do it. For important pages (say, main page article) you can actually do the removal without the article ever bring unavailable, but that does take a lot of work. Think move, save, protect, delete, restore, move, unprotect ;-) Several other users use similar pages, the most prominent that I can think of it User:Freakofnurture/dev/null/. Happy editing! Prodego talk 21:10, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sr. Im not putting any cusswords on there...

Re:Somerset

[edit]

A CheckUser was performed for Sheogarath, and William Shaksphere, Welcomebot, and Professor Somerset were all confirmed as sockpuppets. It's not surprising, since I know Sheogarath has tried to play tricks on me before (he's Molag Bal, but Martin and I decided to give him another shot). Anyway, I'm still discussing this with Martin via email regarding this whole situation. Nishkid64 23:48, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, Martin pointed out Sheogarath and I verified (he made a personal confession) that he was Molag Bal. I also knew Welcomebot was his bot, and I was considering shutting it down since his previous unregistered bot malfunctioned. Anyway, I blocked them now, but I'm still deciding about Sheogarath. Nishkid64 23:50, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Geneva Glen Camp Wikipedia

[edit]

Yes, i did blank the page, but I do not necessairily want it deleted. I was the creator of the page, and I am currently engaged in discussion with the administration of the camp which the page was about regarding its content. When a conclusion is reached in our discussion, I will re-create the framework of the page in a way such that the discussed camp will continue to condone its existance. It is possible that they will request I delete it, and at such time I will post a deletion request. I ask in the mean time that you don't revert the page. Thank you. Chuck Norris' IQ can be expressed simply as a sideways eight. 00:24, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Clarification

[edit]

Concerning my Usertalk page. Could you please inform me of what information was cause for trolling and a personal attack? I took information from the blog in question. I used that information to refute a number of personal attacks that were made on me. While I plan to abide by your decision, I would appreciate if you would explain to me what the problem was so that I might understand your position better.And the truth shall set you free! 03:08, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I want to clarify on what was going on here. Mheckman1978 is a member of the berks blog network which the content that Berksguy was using against Matt Heckman was in direct violation of our copyright laws. Berksguy in no way shape or form has gained permission to use our sites content on his user talk page or any other page. We have provided information to other articles in the past for educational purposes, and what Berksguy did with our content was not for "educational" purposes. I will admit that Mheckman1978 may have gone over the top, but was justified in removing copyright protected content. Furthermore Berksguy was also the one that started this affair that caused things to blow out of control as shown in the history trail in both the discussion and usertalk pages. For that I request that Berksguy is equally banned for the same thing Mheckman1978 was.
Regards,
Administrator for the berks blog network —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 72.78.174.93 (talk • contribs) December 13, 2006.

My User Page

[edit]

I don't know who else to ask but does my user page have a problem? Go Futurama! User:Sp3000 08:49, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

According to Kzrulzuall, the infobox is overlapping part of my banners. Go Futurama! User:Sp3000 04:59, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi glen, the company is fairly large and globally recognised with plenty of press coverage. Is the issue simply that the article must be written by a third party? Or can we get an entry by providing third part content (articles/associates etc) thanks

Wikipedia Weekly Notification!

[edit]

This is just a friendly reminder that Wikipedia Weekly has been released with a new episode!

Actually, it's a couple of new episodes. I've been moving to an place closer to campus (my commute was getting to me) and hence, the reminder message was a little slow in coming out. So slow we put out 2 where before we had 1.

Anyways, all is good now, here's the new episodes!

As always you can download old episodes and more at http://wikipediaweekly.com/!

Please spread the word about Wikipedia Weekly, we're trying to spread the word so that people know about the project, we've got some cool guests lined up and it makes it much more fun if people tune in!

For Tawker and the rest of the Wikipedia Weekly crew -- Tawkerbot 05:52, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You are recieving this message because you are listed on Wikipedia:WikiProject WikipediaWeekly/delivery - if you do not wish to recieve such notifications please remove yourself from the list.

References

[edit]

Is that enough or do you need a few more from a different source? I-to-i 10:39, 13 December 2006 (UTC) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by I-to-i (talk • contribs) 10:39, 13 December 2006 (UTC).[reply]

Controversies have settled down

[edit]

Hi Glen! I see that User:Terryeo has been indefinitely blocked on 12 November 2006. I wondered why the editing squabbles had suddenly stopped and peace has reigned among the Scientology articles in the last month. He was definitely the guy creating problems there.--Fahrenheit451 04:38, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Things are still better than when Terryeo was "commenting" on talk pages. I think we will learn more about this other person as events progress. It is most interesting, but not surprising.--Fahrenheit451 17:00, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A demonstration...

[edit]

Of what the IPs you're blocking are seeing:

{{schoolblock}}

See what I meant earlier? = ) If you really feel the need to attach a comment, you can also do {{schoolblock|comment here}}. Just don't sign it since ~~~~ doesn't expand. Cheers. --  Netsnipe  ►  17:08, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Heckelphone

[edit]

Heckelphone (talk · contribs) — see this users contributions to Don Lorenzo Perosi here as well as his other contributions. I suspect this may be a new puppet for someone you have dealt with in the past. -- moe.RON Let's talk | done 19:36, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you - indefblocked :)  Glen  19:57, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

X-Chat script

[edit]

Got it to load, but it keeps crashing X-Chat once it's loaded.

Also, thanks for the tools. This is great. It'll take a bit getting used to them, but so far, it's making things much easier. Landus Mikain 23:15, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the revert

[edit]

Thanks for the userpage revert. -→Buchanan-Hermit™/?! 08:23, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

i-to-i

[edit]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:I-to-i/I-to-i I've made some changes, what else will I need or is that ok? cheers for the corp box as well! I-to-i 09:18, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vandilisim

[edit]

24.123.109.182 12:24, 14 December 2006 (UTC)Hello, I’ve never signed up to this site and I was messaging you because I saw I had a ton of messages about vandalism I am very sorry about those incidences and I was wondering if there was a way to block me from editing but not viewing this site? I really love wikipedia, but I don’t have time to contribute, I mostly use it from public computers (I’m on citrix right now, which lets me get on my school server from home) and I think that some jerks are messing with my computer when I walk away or something. I know you may not believe it, but I am being very honest right now. And again, Im really sorry for the inconvenience.[reply]

Sincerly,

Rocklan

My Appologies

[edit]

I am a teacher at Southmont high school, the ip address that has been warned of vandalism on several occasions, and a student recently brought my attention to this delema. I assure you that we will try our best to stop this unlawful act and ask you not to susspend our account for the more responsible students. Instead I request that you give us the time and date of any more violations so we can seek out and punish the violator ourselves. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 165.139.224.1 (talk) 13:48, 14 December 2006 (UTC).[reply]

about deleting the La Religieuse (film)

[edit]

I know that I am a new user , and maybe the way that I created that page was wrong. but I think it was ok , I collect the information from IMDB and put them in there ,maybe just the plot was not ok but I have refrenced it there. I think that the page maybe can be restored , and just the plot be changed. Thanks —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ali 22ir (talk • contribs) 15:43, 14 December 2006 (UTC).[reply]

Re: Sheogarath

[edit]

Ooops! Thanks for reminding me - I suppose I was just following WP:DFT, based on his constant abuse of the talk page after the block. In any case, feel free to unprotect and/or review the block if you want to :D Martinp23 20:59, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ive got a new article for you!

[edit]

WORKING ON IT - PLEASE REPLY A.S.A.P IF YOU WANT THIS NEW ARTICLE

ThePress.com/NewArticle —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 74.107.104.180 (talk) 23:43, 14 December 2006 (UTC).[reply]

My new favorite user

[edit]

here - crz crztalk 08:11, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

lol, yeah saw that - Misza beat me :)  Glen  08:25, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Another sock?

[edit]

Yankeesin2007 (talk · contribs) - might want to take a look at this users contributions. Cheers! -- moe.RON Let's talk | done 06:49, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Speaking of socks...

[edit]

Dipshit decided to reset his cable modem and got a new IP; see my user page for the hilarious result. Whack-a-mole Time!  E. Sn0 =31337= Talk 07:51, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Interested?

[edit]

Hi Glen, You probably don't know me (or you probably do) but I like to help/welcome newcomers and as a result I have created my own little Help Desk for newcomers and anyone seeking help, and I have created a section titled "Still need help? ask another editor!" and have writen about what to do if you need help and I have mentioned about the {{helpme}} tag and other stuff, but I have also added the "Ask one of my recommended administrators" (I promise, you will understand this fully if you see the article) and I am in the process of picking admins to add to that list, and as you are priviledged you get to be the first admin on that list :-), but it would require helping anyone who wanted questions answering and helping newcomers, etc... So if you dont mind (If you dont want to be on the list, because your too busy, etc... I totally understand) becoming one of my recommended admins on my list? If you do, you can add your name straight on to the list, replacing where it says "No admins as of yet - please use the current 2 options above".

Thank you for your time and happy editing ;-)

P.S, I you leave a message on my talk page i wont reply until Saturday 16th December as i am very busy up until then.

Again thank you.

Dep. Garcia (Talk to Me) 21:39, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]


I shall add your name to the list now. If at all you want to be removed from the list, just ask me and I will remove you, or you can remove yourself. No explaination is needed to why you removed youself. Thanks again. Dep. Garcia (Talk to Me) 18:04, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

VandalProof

[edit]

I try to verify myself but if I click on "Verify Authorisation" nothing happens. Go Futurama! User:Sp3000 10:21, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's still not working. Go Futurama! User:Sp3000 03:38, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for helping out

[edit]

and for pointing out that it had been deleted again -- I left a message alongside yours on Zoe's talk page. I honestly don't know why Zoe is acting the way s/he is and whether or not there's some merit to his/her actions that I'm just not seeing, but it seems like s/he is taking pretty liberal advantage of admin status. I appreciate your willingness to get involved to help resolve this. Dylan 09:06, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again for your help -- I did as you suggested. Once the AfD is over, I'll post a requested move from Pornotube to PornoTube -- the capitalized T is correct, anyway, and this way we can avoid DRV. Dylan 23:03, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted Edits

[edit]

I'm pretty sure admins are able to check deleted edits so... if possible, can you check about how many I have. I just want to know. Thanks! TeckWizTalkContribs@ 20:50, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

i was wondering.

[edit]

do you get paid for this? what is the first page created? can you give me a link to it? and how can i post something besides my userpage without it beig called nonsense and deleted? (lokk for Jim harbis in your deleted files or ask Lucky 6.9 about it.)--Ninja Dojo 22:16, 16 December 2006 (UTC)SHING![reply]

what

[edit]

You reverted my edit to Peace Of Mind (Fake Beatles Song) for some reason. I would like an explanation. I think "fake song" is a little POV, don't you? I was trying to redirect it to the NPOV article, Peace Of Mind (song) Hahawhat 22:55, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You!

[edit]

Thank you for your input at my RFA, which successfully closed at 58/2/0. I will think about the 10 questions and answers I had, and I hope that I will use the tools constructively and for the benefit of Wikipedia. If you ever need any help, don't be afraid to drop me a line. I'm here to help afterall! ‎8) -Royalguard11(Talk·Desk·Review Me!) 23:37, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Recreation of a DB-Nonsense Article

[edit]

Hello Glen S, the author of this db nonsense article has recreated it after it was previously deleted a short while ago. Could you take a look at it please? Thank you.¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 23:41, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nice Test :P

[edit]

You do keep your eyes on watchlists don't you :P! Well the tools seem spot on great however it does not automatically pop up to the user talk page as you described (it does give me the warning templates however, which I have already broken in on one user). I'm not a whiz with monobook programming so how should I turn popups off?¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 00:11, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • Thanks for taking the time to set me up with the whole shebang however as I mentioned above, I'm not so familiar with customizing monobook...I'm trying to find which coding to remove in order to inactivate popups but I'm sort of lost at the moment. When you have the chance I would greatly appreciate if you could indicate what I need to do in order to remove it from my monobook, thanks.¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 00:21, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oh trust me I love it! I just want to make sure I'm aware of how to use it! The only problem that I am running into is that the user talk page does not appear automatically. It successfully displays a screen which shows various messages of how it is reverting the edit and then it shows the article once more. I had to go through the article history and press on the IP/username manually and press the tabs at the side to issue a warning. Anything that I might be doing wrong?¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 00:34, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I apologise that I have begun to pester you today but seems like I've got new problems. I added wikipedia.org to my safe list in my standard popup blocker. When I returned I noticed that my "revert vandal" link that use to appear is no there anymore (however the "restore this version" link is still there). I tried refreshing the cach with "Crtl F5" but this did not work. I also restored my monobook to the version with Lupis popups and refreshed again but this still did not fix the problem. I appreciate your help, thanks.¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 00:47, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Hey

[edit]

Hey dude, you must be an RP Patroller. I moved a page and you were all "So is it that you'ld like to do?" Why exactly did u post that. Pacmanfever 03:35, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Glen/Archive10&oldid=1079926138"