User talk:Glendon wasey

Your submission at Articles for creation: Michael Stokes (photographer) (October 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Michael Stokes (photographer) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:48, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Glendon wasey, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:48, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Michael Stokes (photographer) has been accepted

Michael Stokes (photographer), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 05:28, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

November 2019

Hello, Glendon wasey. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 02:58, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Stokes

Responding to what you wrote at WP:AFCH and I wrote a note at User talk:2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63. There are two issues. First the photograph. The person who took it has the copyright and that is the person who needs to give permission. That's just how copyright on photos work. Secondly, hopefully the user who marked the Conflict of Interest will respond here, he did leave an automated message above.Naraht (talk) 20:35, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry I didn't see this and respond sooner, Naraht. This is a long term COI issue, to which Mr. Wasey has never responded as far as I can tell. He does periodically remove the templates from the article without fully addressing the problems. 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 03:28, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize, I have *completely* forgotten what this is about. Can you direct me to the article/AFCH entry I made. :(Naraht (talk) 14:52, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Naraht, here's a link to the BLP report I filed [1]. 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 03:48, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I would really like to get this conflict of interest and incorrect citing of sources issues resolved. I have stated -- though it's likely I did it in the wrong place -- that I do not know the subject personally, though I did email him to ask if I could upload a photo from his website. He said yes, and I uploaded it, not realizing that this could be considered a copyright issue. The photo was removed (I now understand why) and then the conflict of interest note appeared at the top of the page. If someone can please tell me what I need to do to resolve these issues, I would appreciate it. I find this all a bit confusing. Glendon wasey (talk) 22:03, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Glendon wasey! You created a thread called COI at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Glendon wasey! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Follow-up to COI, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:06, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]