User talk:Globalprofessor
Welcome!
Hello, Globalprofessor, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Slgr@ndson (page - messages - contribs) 18:58, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
Please don't remove warnings
[edit]Please do not remove legitimate warnings from your talk page or replace them with inappropriate content. Removing or maliciously altering warnings from your talk page will not remove them from the page history. You're welcome to archive your talk page, but be sure to provide a link to any deleted legitimate comments. If you continue to remove or vandalize legitimate warnings from your talk page, you will lose your privilege of editing your talk page. Thanks. -- Paleorthid 04:36, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
Spam in Masters of the Secrets
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/3/35/Information_icon.svg/62px-Information_icon.svg.png)
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Masters of the Secrets, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Masters of the Secrets is blatant advertising for a company, product, group, service or person that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article.
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Masters of the Secrets, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 16:35, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
March 2008
[edit] Please do not add content without citing reliable sources, as you did to International New Thought Alliance. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Contact me if you need assistance adding references. Thank you.
- From Global Professor: Both Articles were restored and new citations were added. By eliminating the restorations, this removed the full articles and the brand new citations. The goal was to fix the articles from the previous vandalism.
Please do not add content without citing reliable sources, as you did to Christian D. Larson. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Contact me if you need assistance adding references. Thank you.
- From Global Professor: Both Articles were restored and new citations were added. By eliminating the restorations, this removed the full articles and the brand new citations. The goal was to fix the articles from the previous vandalism.
(Per WP:PROVEIT this also applies to "the editor who ... restores material".) HrafnTalkStalk 03:48, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
Hoping for your simple explaination of your complete removal of the articles and new citations? User:GlobalProfessor
- Neither of the sources you cited (an anonymously-authored, commercially-driven page of doubtful provenance & a 90yo 'History' written by a movement insider) were WP:RSs, and the vast majority of the material you restored was wholly unsourced. HrafnTalkStalk 09:52, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Your recent edits
[edit]Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 18:28, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
March 2009
[edit] Your recent edits to American Academy of Financial Management could give Wikipedia contributors the impression that you may consider legal or other "off-wiki" action against them, or against Wikipedia itself. Please note that this is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's policies on legal threats and civility. Users who make such threats may be blocked. If you have a dispute with the content of any page on Wikipedia, please follow the proper channels for dispute resolution. RJC TalkContribs 04:33, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
Articles for deletion nomination of Chartered Wealth Manager
[edit]I have nominated Chartered Wealth Manager, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chartered Wealth Manager. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. RJC TalkContribs 20:31, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
October 2010
[edit] Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to American Academy of Financial Management. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. RJC TalkContribs 18:07, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
![Notice](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/7/74/Ambox_warning_yellow.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_yellow.svg.png)
The article Chartered Portfolio Manager has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Promo-like unnotable article created by spam sockpuppet account
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ‒overthrows 17:08, 31 August 2021 (UTC)