User talk:Gniibe

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames that give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, I have blocked this account; please take a moment to create a new account with a username that represents only yourself as an individual and which complies with our username policy.  You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose.

If your username does not represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice.

You may simply create a new account, but you may prefer to change your username to one that complies with our username policy, so that your past contributions are associated with your new username. If you would prefer to change your username, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice. Thank you. -- Ed (Edgar181) 12:59, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Gniibe (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I don't understand the claim that my account represents a group, organization or website. I have my personal website, www.gniibe.org, but its domain name came from my login name. I, as an individual, use this login name for more than twenty years, and I created Wikipedia's account using this "gniibe". For the login name, I put 'g' to my family name 'Niibe' to express my gratitude to GNU Project. It is a kind of promotion of GNU Project, but I don't think this could be reason to be blocked.

Decline reason:

It doesn't matter how it came to be your domain name, our policy is pretty firm about not using your domain name as your username and then putting in links to that domain. — Daniel Case (talk) 00:23, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Gniibe (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I'm one of friend of gniibe san. I heard user gniibe blocked by administrative reason from gniibe san. I read reason, and felt this decision is not reasonable. When you search 'gniibe' by using Google, you can get many of search results about gniibe. I checked these results with higher rank ( top 30 ), and these results are about gniibe san, and user gniibe (gniibe san) is blocked by wikipedia. This is not reasonable.

Decline reason:

In this situation, it's really not a good idea to get other people to make your unblock requests for you. — Daniel Case (talk) 00:23, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock request[edit]

This user has been editing Wikipedia for a few years, and has made minor but quality contributions in the past. I agree that it's poor form to link to one's own domain with a matching username, but this is for a Free Software, Open Hardware random-number generator. I think it's likely that the user won't repeat the offence. Can we let the user get away with a warning this time? --ESP (talk) 02:05, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't matter what he's doing. Until he uses {{unblock-un}} to propose a new username and agrees not to make any edits linking to that domain again, an unblock is out of the question. Daniel Case (talk) 03:55, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
OK. Thanks for reviewing once again. --ESP (talk) 14:36, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]