User talk:Goffy3

Hello children.

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Help:CentralAuth, did not appear to be constructive and has been removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Clark89 (talk) 02:01, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Bmets[edit]

I have nominated Bmets, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bmets. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Airplaneman ^talk 22:24, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia![edit]

- - - W e l c o m e - - -

Hello, Goffy3! Thank you for your contributions. My name's Airplaneman and I just wanted to say hi and Welcome to Wikipedia!! You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of the world's largest encyclopædia. If you have any questions, feel free to ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name, the date and the time. If you are already loving Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field every time you edit. Again, welcome, and happy editing! Airplaneman ^talk 23:07, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Help
Getting Started		Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image
Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

January 2010[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Vivienne. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. matt (talk) 19:10, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Elizabeth Griscom[edit]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Elizabeth Griscom, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Betsy Ross. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 22:13, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

More Elizabeth Griscom[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. I see that you may have just made a mistake in the title, but please be more careful in the future. 4 PAGES CREATED TO DATE. User:KingofFilm, the mighty Wikipedian. 22:16, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Elizabeth Griscom[edit]

A tag has been placed on Elizabeth Griscom, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia for multiple reasons. Please visit the article for details.

You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Goffy3 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My son goes on my account and publishes to impress his friends, I will no longer allow him to go on my account indefinitely.

Decline reason:

Since your edits show vandalism over a prolonged period of time, we have no way to verify who's in control of this account. Thus, it will not be unblocked, ever. Max Semenik (talk) 08:13, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Goffy3 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My son goes on my account and publishes to impress his friends, I will no longer allow him to go on my account indefinitely. He is now 13 and I told him that if he ever hacks into my account again he will have all his technological devices taken away (it's a bad punishment for him).

Decline reason:

As mentioned above, the "Little Brother Defense" rarely works. If you truly are a legitimate person who was "hacked" - two years ago, I might add - you might consider a WP:CLEANSTART. Also, please do not remove declined unblock requests from your page; doing so is against policy. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 05:17, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Goffy3 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Yeah ok I lied but honestly those past vandalism actions were to impress my friend but I know hate him and I now want to actually be constructive to Wikipedia especially in the Children's books and Children's TV shows area. Please unblock me I promise to be very mature and if I do misbehave then I will allow Wikipedia Administrators to block me without argument.

Decline reason:

Once we have had a claim that an account has been misused by more than one person, we can then never know who is telling the truth. It could be that one person has been lying about this being their Mom or Dad's account, or it could be that it really is Mom or Dad's account and that their delightful offspring is now lying about having been lying all along. There is no way we can possibly tell the difference now. So this account can not be used again, and as soon as I have submitted this decline, I will remove the ability to edit this talk page. If you wish to edit Wikipedia, you will now need to follow WP:CLEANSTART -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 13:14, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.