User talk:Golongong

Ok Roman, I've opened another thread at WP:ANI about your latest sock. Just letting you know. You're not going to wear me out. --Mkativerata (talk) 06:44, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Who is this Roman you are talking about? Golongong (talk) 06:45, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oh and thanks for the barnstar. Much appreciated. --Mkativerata (talk) 06:46, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What is this about a barnstar? I have also reported you for abusing the system and misrepresenting yourself. Golongong (talk) 06:52, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You're not fooling anyone, Roman. Your writing style is too distinctive for that. I've commented on the ANI, and will be watching your actions with interest. Drmargi (talk) 07:16, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What similar style of writing are you talking about? I don't know you and the person you are talking about.Golongong (talk) 07:35, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet of Roman888 (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log). Blocked or banned users are not allowed to edit Wikipedia; if you are banned, all edits under this account may be reverted.

If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Golongong (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

These accusations are unwarranted. I have no relationship which the individual these gentlemen are talking about. These individuals are abusing the system by making all these false reports. I seek redress in this issue and hope another admin will look at this case

Decline reason:

No they are not unwarranted. You repeatedly reinserted material in violation of others' copyrights, and you well know that. One doesn't have to go far as to comparing your additions to the content in the sites themselves to verify that. –MuZemike 07:57, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You are putting Wikipedia at too much of a risk for you repeatedly inserting copyrighted material when you clearly know we cannot accept copyrighted materials – only free content licensed under the CC-BY-SA or the GFDL. –MuZemike 07:59, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Golongong (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have not reinserted copyright materials repeatedly. I do not even know the 2 individuals who have made these claims against me. Furthermore you are placing assumptions that I have violated the copy right rules. Don't just arbitrarily wave my arguments away, but consider my appeal.

Decline reason:

You have clearly reinserted exactly the same material, in the same article, that Roman888 has in the past. It certainly looks highly likely that you are the same user, and hence evading a block. ~ mazca ^talk 10:01, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Speedy deletion of Malaysian New Economic Model[edit]

Hello Golongong, this is a message from an automated bot to inform you that the page you created, Malaysian New Economic Model, has been marked for speedy deletion by User:MER-C. This has been done because the page was created in violation of a ban (see CSD). If you think the tag was placed in error, please add "{{hangon}}" to the page text, and edit the talk page to explain why the page should not be deleted. If you have a question about this bot, please ask it at User talk:SDPatrolBot II. If you have a question for the user who tagged the article, see User talk:MER-C. Thanks, - SDPatrolBot II (talk) on behalf of MER-C (talk · contribs) 14:39, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]