User talk:GooseSpoon
This is GooseSpoon's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
AfC notification: Draft:Lacunicambarus polychromatus has a new comment[edit]
Your submission at Articles for creation: Lacunicambarus polychromatus has been accepted[edit]
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 12:11, 23 May 2024 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation: Odie Leigh (June 13)[edit]
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Odie Leigh and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
- @Iwaqarhashmi the sources are primary sources from the artist herself. If I'm misunderstanding something, I apologize. GooseSpoon (talk) 17:30, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
- Have a look at WP:RSPRIMARY, primary sources are generally discouraged and, if used, should be used with caution. Secondary sources are much more preferable. Procyon117 (talk) 14:14, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
Hello, GooseSpoon!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Waqar💬 07:23, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
|
3RR[edit]
Please be aware of WP:3RR; if your edits are in dispute you should seek consensus for them on the talk page rather than continuing to revert. — Czello (music) 21:35, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
June 2024[edit]
Hi GooseSpoon! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Trametes versicolor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you. jlwoodwa (talk) 23:13, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that your recent edit to Trametes versicolor did not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.
The edit summary field looks like this:
Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)
Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary, and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! jlwoodwa (talk) 23:13, 26 June 2024 (UTC)