User talk:Gorsh

Afd[edit]

Notice the amount of times this has been Afd'd. Review the nature of these discussions and note the results. Give a compelling reason why this should be deleted. The reason you give does not fit, at all. You: Wikipedia policies are stupid. If you're unwilling to stick by the policies then do not contribute to the project. I also have the feeling you've not even read a lot of these policies and guidelines. Whether the subject wants an article or not does not matter in the slightest. Skinnyweed 17:07, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You should also list the deletion notice on the article. Yet more evidence of my suspicions. Skinnyweed 17:09, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Block Notice[edit]

You have been blocked for 24 hours for your disruptive AfD nomination of Daniel Brandt, and your conduct therein. It is a suspicious thing for a new account to nominate a well-known contentious article for deletion; it is a disruptive thing to claim one will "delete votes" during an AfD. In my view, it is reasonable to conclude that you are not a new user, given this aggressive conduct. Whether you are, or are not, please reread Wikipedia policy before commenting again, and when next you do so, please do so in a civil and collegial fashion. Best wishes, Xoloz 19:21, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]