User talk:Gothamk

Nomination of Purna Chandra Jamatia for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Purna Chandra Jamatia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Purna Chandra Jamatia until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

bonadea contributions talk 18:31, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AFDs

Hello, Gothamk,

You are welcome to participate in AFDs, despite your limited experience, but please make a contribution to the discussions you participate in. Please examine the sources in the article and ones that are mentioned in the deletion discussion, evaluate them and be specific about which ones you think do or do not help establish notability. Do your homework and do not just offer an opinion about the current state of the article. Your contribution in a deletion discussion demonstrates your knowledge of Wikipedia policy and guidelines surrounding verfiability and notability and offering a throw-away remark will cause it to be dismissed by the discussion closer. Look at the participation of other editors and try to match their level of thoroughness. It's a demanding area to contribute to as an editor. Thank you for your contributions to the project. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:48, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You very much. Gothamk (talk) 08:10, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of DeepBrain AI

Hi @Gothamk. 6 hours ago you suggested to make edits to the page otherwise it would get deleted, I just saw this message and was about to start editing but I cannot find the page. All the information on that page was cited with references. However, I do agree that it might had some promotional content which I was about to edit. Kindly help me how to make it live again. This page deletion might affect my contributions. Thank you for your guidance :) MonstrousP (talk)monstrousP MonstrousP (talk) 17:30, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi MonstrousP, I flagged your page for deletion because, in my opinion, it was too promotional for Wikipedia. Yes, you may create a new version of the page, but make sure you are familiar with Wikipedia's Advert policy for articles. You may contact Jimfbleak, the deleting administrator for further information regarding the deletion of your article.Gothamk (talk) 07:05, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Rajesh Tripura

The article Rajesh Tripura has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not enough in-depth coverage to meet WP:GNG, and does not meet WP:NPOL.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:03, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Gothamk! Your additions to The Y (film) have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 04:06, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sir DanCherek, I appreciate your alerting me. In the future, I'll take care of this. Gothamk (talk) 05:42, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: G.T. Dhungel has been accepted

G.T. Dhungel, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

𝐋𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐕𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐭𝟕𝟐𝟖🧙‍♂️^{Let's Talk !} 11:56, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023

Your account has been blocked indefinitely for advertising or promotion and violating the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use. This is because you have been making promotional edits to topics in which you have a financial stake, yet you have failed to adhere to the mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a form of conflict of interest (COI) editing which involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is strictly prohibited. Using this site for advertising or promotion is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, please read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page. For that request to be considered, you must:

Confirm that you have read and understand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements.
State clearly how you are being compensated for your edits, and describe any affiliation or conflict of interest you might have with the subjects you have written about.
Describe how you intend to edit such topics in the future.

GeneralNotability (talk) 17:13, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]