User talk:Gppande/Archive 2
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |
Nagpur police and Mumbai police
Hi Thanks For using my image of Maharashtra police. I requir your help. This image is for deletation Buecause of improper copy right tag. but I have added proper tags ( Actually tags of NYPD image and of mine are Exactly same. only Source is diffrent) For more info see my talk page. Please Help to stop deletion of this imageSuyogaerospacetalk to me! 14:36, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
- Thank you for saving this photo. How to explain wikipedia that logo of Maharashtra police can be use of there logo is allowed freely w.r.t to their article. Jai Hind Jai Maharashtra --Suyogaerospacetalk to me! 17:09, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
I got your point I think we must personaly contact him --Suyogaerospacetalk to me! 12:06, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
Wikipedia
Going to Alexandria??--Suyogaerospacetalk to me! 12:52, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
- I want to Go But Money matters Plus i am only 18 year old Parents will not allow me. And I am 4 Months old on wiki What the hell i would do in Egypt.? I am doing Engineering so no time to wast :-) (Excluding site seeing)--Suyogaerospacetalk to me! 08:55, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
DYK
Cheers, Daniel (talk) 12:38, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
Help urgent help
Hi Some American Administrator has Deleted the pic of Rakesh Sherma. Pic was subjected to speedy Delitation.on its Discussion I posted that the pic was from News paper No one replyed to my post and it was deleted --Suyogaerospacetalk to me! 10:20, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
- I dont know the tag (!?) But now From where should we now get pic of Rakesh sharma?? Jai Hind jai Maharashtra happy Maharashtra divas Suyogaerospacetalk to me! 12:23, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
- How will I come to know that its Free image ( I think American are taking "Khunass" on us first it was regarding Mumbai Police and how Rakesh Sharma--Suyogaerospacetalk to me! 13:32, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
- it is now our prestige issue--Suyogaerospacetalk to me! 13:44, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
- I agree with you. But when user like User:Whpq & User:Nv8200p deal with me rudely without explaining me the netiquettes of wikipedia I think they should read thisWikipedia:Please do not bite the newcomers--Suyogaerospacetalk to me! 05:29, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
One more thing The pics of National heros are NOT Copyrited--Suyogaerospacetalk to me! 05:29, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
Happy Maharashtra Divas
Happy Maharashtra Divas Jai Hind Jai Maharashtra--Suyogaerospacetalk to me! 05:29, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
DYK
--Gatoclass (talk) 15:15, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
RE:PSLV
Replied on my talk page. Regards, Ganeshk (talk) 00:52, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
Hi! Thanks a lot for the great work on the Gangtok page. I am quite busy for a few days, so could not really go through the improvements properly. I just logged in for a while, and had a glimpse, and it seemed excellent. Please keep up the good work. We have to save the article from demotion. Thanks again.--Dwaipayan (talk) 17:46, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
- I don't think the template makers kept India in mind when rainfall was concerned. :) You'd have to ask the template talk page, or at the village pump. I think they would have to recalibrate the scales. Regards, =Nichalp «Talk»= 19:13, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
5/7 DYK
--Bedford 00:51, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
Rakesh sherma pic
Hi dude we can use this tags for the pic of rakesh sherma just see the tag http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Agni-III_Republic_day.jpg --Suyogaerospacetalk to me! 06:20, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
Gangtok contd.
The article is gradually taking better shape. Hope to work on some other aspects also (one I have not been able to look into is "City institutions". The "History" section seems to be deficient as well). This will be followed by copyedit by Nichalp. How do you like the progress so far?--Dwaipayan (talk) 15:28, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
- Usually, there is no separate section on "city institutions" in Indian city articles. The content of such a section is incorporated into "Culture". Since in this article "City institutions" was a pretty large section, I thought it would not look good to incorporate the content into "Culture' directly, rather institutions was made a subsection of culture. However, this may be changed later.
- Regarding sikkiminfo, for teh time being, let's keep it. Meanwhile, let's search if the information supported by sikkiminfo can be cited by other non-controversial websites/news sites. The reliability of sources sometimes depend on teh kind of information it has been used for. For example, Gangtok a helicopter service can be supported by sikkiminfo, whereas gangtok's population cannot be supported by a citation from sikkiminfo. Let's see what happens. There is time.--Dwaipayan (talk) 15:50, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
- Get Nagpur ready for FAC. It already seems to be comprehensive in several sections.--Dwaipayan (talk) 16:31, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
- Length of FAR—I am not sure. May be 1 week more, or, even more. Indeed, if some article in FAR is improving in a good way, some more time may be allowed in good faith. Time won't be a problem in this case. I shall have a good look on Nagpur later.--Dwaipayan (talk) 06:57, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
- Get Nagpur ready for FAC. It already seems to be comprehensive in several sections.--Dwaipayan (talk) 16:31, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
I drastically reduced the Transport section. And created the daughter article Transport in Nagpur. Mihan's details are not needed in transport section, as those are mentioned under Economy.
Demographics section needs more content. See Wikipedia:WikiProject Indian cities for guidelines. Geography and Climate are pretty short, so can be merged, unless more content is added. Regards.--Dwaipayan (talk) 11:06, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
- Yes, i wish to work on Nagpur. However, at present working on others, including Gangtok, Pather Panchali, and Direct Action Day. Nagpur needs about 8-10 hours' work to get it in a good shape.
- Indded, I also thought about the DYK, with the same fact in the hook!!!--Dwaipayan (talk) 11:28, 12 May 2008 (UTC)