Jump to content

User talk:Gprfc

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

September 2009

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Goldsworth park rangers f.c. has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Irbisgreif (talk) 21:07, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

FYI conflict of interest guideline

[edit]

If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Goldsworth Park Rangers F.C., you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

  1. editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
  2. participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
  3. linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Thank you. — Athaenara 22:36, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Laakson Palloseura requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guidelines for people and for organizations. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Freshymail-user_talk:fngosa--the-knowledge-defender 22:42, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Laakson Palloseura has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. ~SpK 22:50, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, I just declined the request for speedy deletion, but seeing that you blanked the page, as User:SpK mentions above, it looks like you, as the only contributor, were asking for deletion. Is that indeed the case, or are you interested in improving the page, now that the threat of immediate deletion is gone? — Sebastian 04:57, 9 September 2009 (UTC)    (I may not be watching this page anymore. If you would like to continue the conversation, please do so here and let me know.)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Finland national under-17 football team requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Eeekster (talk) 11:15, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Surrey & Hants Border Football League Division 1 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Eeekster (talk) 18:31, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article Fred Matthews has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Tmol42 (talk) 23:00, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article Goldsworth Park Rangers F.C. has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't play at a notable level of football

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ChrisTheDude (talk) 10:21, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Laakson Palloseura Article

[edit]

I make the following comments on the Laakson Palloseura article which has previously been proposed for deletion (refer User_talk:90.198.32.58):

1. There is no evidence that there is a club named Laakson Palloseura that is an affiliated club with the Helsingin piiri (Helsinki District) of the Suomen PalloLiitto (Finnish FA) and playing at a “notable level” within the 8 tiers of the Finnish_football_league_system.

2. There is no evidence of a stadium called Laakso Stadion with a supposed capacity of 4,000.

3. There is no evidence of Laakson Palloseura competing in the Kolmonen and finishing 4th in the 2008 or 2009 seasons in any of the 3 relevant sections administered by the Helsinki SPL and Uusimaa SPL.

4. There is no evidence of a website for a club named Laakson Palloseura or any Finnish language related material making reference to a club of this name.

5. LPS is the abbreviation for Laajasalon Palloseura which is a Helsinki based club.

It is quite possible that the author has misinterpreted Laakson Palloseura for Laajasalon Palloseura and I suggest that the position be now rectified by re-directing Laakson Palloseura to the Laajasalon Palloseura page.

Alternatively if there is proven evidence of a club called Laakson Palloseura which meets the “notability” criteria, I would be delighted to assist in developing the article from its current stub status. Finnish Gas (talk) 20:05, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Template:Goldsworth Park Rangers F.C. squad has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. BigDom 19:28, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:13, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Surrey & Hants Border Football League for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Surrey & Hants Border Football League is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Surrey & Hants Border Football League until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 14:11, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]