User talk:Gpski
License tagging for Image:Lancer87.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Lancer87.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 20:08, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
pick one yourself bot , I don't care as that pic will never have any monetary value .
?[edit]
What do you mean that the article (referenced, which you deleted) has no validity? It clear exists. And it is not required that it exist online.--Epeefleche (talk) 20:11, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
May 2010[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Wilno, Ontario, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This is particularly important when adding or changing any facts or figures and helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Deconstructhis (talk) 02:34, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
Real Nice, --- were were you when the page was a mess of graphity and a shabble of misinformation , at least I did something useful and cleaned up the mess. If the fine print isn't good enough for you , take a flying leap or improve it. Thanks gpski
Hello. Who is the author of the griffon in the File:KaszebeGrifon.jpg. I'm sure not you, so please give us some source. Thank You. JDavid (talk) 17:57, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
I took the picture , that makes me the copywrite holder of this picture , is that a problem for you? gpski
If you want more information , look it up at your own expense. Thanks ps Ask the people of Wilno , Ontario
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:37, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
The article Randi Brooks has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 20:04, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
Nomination of Randi Brooks for deletion[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Randi Brooks is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Randi Brooks until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 20:08, 21 October 2018 (UTC)