User talk:Grammaring

Welcome[edit]

Hello, Grammaring, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} and your question on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 21:28, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

We go by the sources[edit]

re your edit [1]. Since we follow the sources, the "neutral" version is "commercial" as the sources clearly talk about the financial aspect and not anything at all about it being "clinical" (other than the fact that it happens in a building called a "clinic".) -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 23:39, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

i did look it up in our sources, and our sources do not call it "clinical", our sources talk about the commercial aspect. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 23:43, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You are the one who is NOT following the sources. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 23:51, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

and my request is the source used in the article "At the junction of desperation and the fantasies of science is a business opportunity. Stem cell clinics offering unproven therapies for a range of diseases have become a multimillion-dollar industry, ... (Rader) said he has arranged more than 1,000 injections, charging $25,000 for the initial treatment and $8,500 for each follow-up." Commercial, NOT clinical. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 23:54, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

At Wikipedia, the "correct usage" is the context of the sources. In this case the correct word is "commercial". -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 23:58, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There is nothing even potentially "libelous" about saying that someone is not breaking US law. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom

Grammaring, you are invited to the Teahouse[edit]

Hi Grammaring! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Writ Keeper (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:16, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

February 2013[edit]

Your recent editing history at William C. Rader shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 22:42, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for confirming your conflict of interest[edit]

Thank you for [ confirming your conflict of interest. I ask now that you have been made aware of our conflict of interest policies (on more than one occasion) that you follow the advice given therein about your relation to editing and discussion of the subject. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 01:28, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]