User talk:Green hornet

Strata (band)[edit]

I think it would be okay to keep Strata (band) because it has toured nationally, and that would meet WP:MUSIC. Please see http://www.stratadirect.com/sections/tour_previous.html --TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 08:48, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AfDs[edit]

You JUST joined Wikipedia. Your first action was to try to get the Strata article deleted. Why don't you devote yourself to something more useful, like editing articles you're interested in, or getting to know how things work around here? PT ^(s-s-s-s) 21:41, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AfDs[edit]

Hi, I'm on Wikibreak so I'm not up to getting involved with stuff, but note that there have been several other people dissatisfied with PT's decisions (see, specifically, here and here) so you're certainly not alone. In this case it appears that you used the wrong procedure for renominating an article (see Template talk:Afdx for more), but it's probably best to wait for a bit before retrying for consensus. The world won't come to an end if this (or any) article stays up a bit longer. All the best, Ziggurat 02:32, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, sorry, my mistake, I was looking at the edit summary on Strata (band), which linked to the first AfD, and not the page itself. In any case, while I disagree with the 'keep' points made on the first AfD (I'd have voted delete as well, on grounds of WP:V) renominating so soon after an AfD has been closed is likely to push consensus in the opposite direction anyway. When collaborating on anything you have to accept that people will make wrong decisions sometimes; the trick is to avoid letting that get you down or get you riled up! Don't worry about it, I'm sure it'll all work out okay in the end. Good luck, Ziggurat 02:53, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"Waste of space"[edit]

I've seen you mention in various places that your practice of deletionism is getting rid of "waste of space" on Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a paper encyclopedia, so there's no space to waste. It's better to delete articles because they aren't verifiable. - Lex 04:18, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your critic[edit]

I think that guy Aminz just has some growing up to do. Can't really blame him for acting that way if he's only a teenager. Arrow740 06:40, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Worldwide perception of Osama bin Laden[edit]

I added what I believe are good reasons for deletion instead of KEEP or MERGE in the AFD and thought I'd leave a personal note saying so.

Regards, -- That Guy, From That Show! 08:24, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Help Delete[edit]

Please consider voicing an opinion in the AfD nomination for the vanity article. Too Beautiful to Live, as support for deletion is being overwhelmed by fans of this local radio show. 207.102.78.164 (talk) 18:00, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

deletion discussion[edit]

You participated in a previous discussion on the deletion of Anarchism and anarcho-capitalism. You may be interested that a new deletion review has begun at WP:Articles_for_deletion/Anarchism_and_anarcho-capitalism_(2nd_nomination). Tb (talk) 22:06, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]