User talk:GregorB/Archive 2
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:GregorB. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |
Hello. Go to the talk page of Juraj Julije Klović and help out with the discussion. A fanatical Italian user keeps on inserting his POV/nationalism into the article, and has now requested the page be moved to "Giorgio Giulio Clovio" - which is false as the man was a Croat and was born in Croatia. There is a vote on the rename happening on the talk page. Please help, as he is canvassing for votes from other Italian users.
- Ignjat Đurđević/Ignazio Giorgi is a similar case (or worse, as there are actually two articles). I'll take a look, but these are very complex issues... GregorB 12:19, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
- Yeah, so I got carried away... I may be wrong, but I cannot support what I cannot provide an argument for. GregorB 20:33, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
Receive Sensitivity Stub
I noticed that you changed my stub on the receiver sensitivity article.
I think the one you chose is inappropriate. It says it's about broadcasting, whereas receiver sensitivity is about radio reception, and is something of interest to a much wider field. Broadcasters are normally interested in transmission, and normally have no need to consider receiver sensitivity. WhaleWey 00:22, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
* I've changed it to com-stub I hope that's OK with you. WhaleWey
AfD Nomination: American TESOL Institute
An article that you have been involved in editing, American TESOL Institute, has been listed by me at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/American TESOL Institute. Please look there to see why this is, if you are interested in whether it should be deleted. Thank you. --A. B. (talk) 02:35, 18 January 2007 (UTC) --A. B. (talk) 02:35, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
Quick on the trigger
Hi, GregorB!
Say, I don't really mind that you hit this article with a "stub" tag. I can easily remove the tag when I've finished writing the article (with citations, no less, in the next hour or so). It's just that you tagged the article 25 minutes after I started writing it! That created an edit conflict for me, breaking my train of thought. How did you spot this brand new article so fast? ;^> DavidCBryant 13:17, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
Hello again! Thanks for writing back. No, I didn't lose my edit. I just had to stop thinking about writing and think about something else for a little while, is all. Which is probably OK, since it was just about time to go feed my doggies their breakfast anyway. ;^> DavidCBryant 14:12, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
- No edit conflicts, no problem, no complaints, but you are fast on the trigger. You just edited a page three minutes after I created it. Wow! Vincent 13:27, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
Pedro Morales is a stub
I've re-added the proper stub to it. The article is short, with very little actual information. A list of titles and so on, doesn't make the article: information on his actual career and life is the useful content here (which there is very little of). RobJ1981 23:42, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
Barack Obama
(accidental delete of tail text)Thanks for catching that! --HailFire 00:44, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
Atp
Since this template is used in Wikimedia and in Wikipedia, I would like to suggest you to use ATP instead. Electionworld Talk? 22:47, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
Anisa Romero
Because she was the lead singer of Sky Cries Mary, a group signed to a major label (Capitol), I think this article asserts notability such that it should not be *speedily* deleted. Feel free to take to AFD if you want. Thanks, NawlinWiki 20:29, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
Hello!
I noticed your edits on Danilo's article and was wondering if you would like to help out with the List of Yugoslavian films article. It's an attempt to gather the best of our cinema (notable, critically acclaimed, award-winning films) and leave out the nationalistic propaganda (except for Yugo nationalism, such as in The Battle of Neretva hehe). Anyway, if you can think of any movies to add to the list, or if you could expand on the articles of movies/actors/directors (as you are already doing w/ Danilo) that would be great! Thanks a lot! :) Maîtresse 20:49, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
Hi you where on that article and helped improving it. now another editor has put on a deletions notic on it. And if you think it should stay i would be greatfull if you pointed that out on the site. Its still a article i think can be improved and it is interesting and notable. thanks --Matrix17 15:21, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
Ok thanks for the help. ;)--Matrix17 15:50, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
Now isotope23 says that he has reported the article to Ad and that it will be deleted. join the discussion on robert bierenbaum. htis is just sutch a joke from hes part.and its personal against me. --Matrix17 19:56, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
The speedy tag (db-bio) you added to this article was removed inappropriately by the author, and I've restored it. Based on the fact that this article's author has already removed speedy tags twice (one was originally added by another user), I've decided not to add an nn-warn to the author's talk page, as this would likely encourage him/her to just remove the tag again. (I realise I'm violating normal procedure in neglecting to warn the author, but I think discretion and common sense are called for in this instance.) Walton Vivat Regina! 18:38, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
Re: Easy meat
Yes, however, the article does exert:
5. Contains at least one member who was once a part of or later joined a band that is otherwise notable; note that it is often most appropriate to use redirects in place of articles on side projects, early bands and such.
from WP:MUSIC, specifically the line from the article "George Parfitt went on to join the band Circulus." and hence the AFD. Therefore, it doesn't qualify under that speedy delete anyways... but yes, I know that you can speedy close AFDs but I don't feel this is the case here. Thanks for bringing it up though. Sasquatch t|c 00:24, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
Matt McAllister Article
- Hello! An article that you contributed to, Matt McAllister, is being considered for deletion on grounds of non-notability.
We encourage you to weigh in your thoughts and vote in the deletion discussion page.--GoodAaron 16:23, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the redirection
Thankyou for redirecting Amulets Against the Dragon Forces!--Romulus 21:01, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Birds of Nepal, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Oo7565 07:42, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
ucfirst
Cool! Cleduc 15:40, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
Khujand prison riot
Thanks for stub-sorting Khujand prison riot. KazakhPol 18:32, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
Query re blocked URL
Hi there,
On the page for the album "Industry" by Richard Thompson and Danny Thompson you have flagged a URL that I included as a spam URL.
This is causing me problems. That URL is actually the address for downloading a document that is an analysis of Richard Thompson's song writing. I am working on the Richard Thompson page and discography at the moment and I would like to cite this document as a reference. There is a genuine need for this URL to be used for references.
Can it be "unspammed" please?
Regards
Bob Dubery 09:31, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
pardon me
I'm sorry, I didn't mean to revert your edit on Pasilalinic-sympathetic compass, and I really didn't think it was vandalism. I was trying to revert some older edit, but forgot to check if it was already fixed, and it was. Again sorry! Leo44 (talk) 19:13, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
Some time ago you made the opening edits to my very rough article on Canadian petroleum history. Thought you might like to see the latest incarnation. Thanks for your help. 05:35, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
Your recent edit to Category:Kansas track and field (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 21:33, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
Copyright violation in Kansas High School Track and Field All Time List
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Kansas High School Track and Field All Time List, by Rick Block, another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Kansas High School Track and Field All Time List is unquestionably copyright infringement, and no assertion of permission has been made.
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Kansas High School Track and Field All Time List, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Kansas High School Track and Field All Time List itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 02:21, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
Dates in the aircraft article infobox
Hi GregorB, I noted that you had altered a number of aircraft article infodates to reflect a simple date format. The changes which have involved a link to a date in aviation is the subject of an ongoing WikiAircraft Work Group deliberation. For the time being could you revert your changes, as per discussion. There are mixed views about the reasons for either date format and no consensus has been reached at present and that is why all aviation article editors are leaving Piotr's work as is. FWIW Bzuk 22:57, 14 July 2007 (UTC).
Aaron Andersen
A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Aaron Andersen, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. mms 01:12, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
{{Height}}
Thanks for the compliments, but I did not put even a quarter of an effort I normally would into designing of this template (mainly because I just wanted to fix its major flaws so it could be usable until it's deprecated). Since you (and undoubtedly other editors) prefer to keep using it, I'd probably have to re-visit it again, unless someone else wants to do the re-design. I see someone already complained about default precision being one instead of zero (something I hastily fixed this morning, but unfortunately the fix broke the fractions support).
Anyway, I'll work on the template some more. If you have any ideas you'd like to see implemented, now would be a good time to let me know. By the way, is this template even used for anything but the conversion of human height? If not, all those fractions and other fancy stuff would be an overkill. Thanks for your comments! Best,—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 19:12, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
- So, what, no 1/128ths, eh? :)) On a more serious note, since the fractions handling code is borrowed from {{m to ft in}} anyway, {{height}} can either have one of the values hard-coded in (halves), or support whatever denominator people would want to use (in which case the frac parameter will be used to specify what is wanted; and it's possible to use 2 so halves are the default). Limiting the selection to two choices (halves and quarters) would actually require quite a bit more work, so I'd rather leave the flexibility that's there for free already.
- Anyway, I'll start working on this as soon as I find a chunk of uninterrupted time (hopefully some time this week). If you happen to think of anything useful to add along the way, don't hesitate to let me know. Best,—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 15:38, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
Why?
I fail to see how that helps. Leonig Mig 17:55, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
Help with a croation source
Hello, can you read Croatian? If you can, we could use your help determining the suitability of a source at Talk:Mirko_Filipović#Sexism_and_homophobia. It would be greatly appreciated. Sancho 07:10, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
- I just wanted to thank you for your help in interpreting that source. :-) Sancho 02:42, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
I removed your deletion tag from this article. It has been vandalized before you saw it. I reverted it back to what I believe tis the correct version. --After Midnight 0001 20:10, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
- No problem. Hopefully, if whoever tags the page doesn't catch it, the admin will before they press delete. The admin is required to check the history, but some don't always remember or take the time. I happened to catch it when I saw this. --After Midnight 0001 20:19, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
External link(s)
Not a huge concern, but why did you change the section header "External link" in The Times (Pawtucket) to "External links"? There's still only one link there. ``` W i k i W i s t a h ``` 02:44, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
Dog diseases category
Thanks for creating and populating that category - it's been on my to-do list for a long time. --Joelmills 16:26, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
György Gábori
Thanks for 'stubbing' it. Squash Racket 16:36, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for your "copy editing" of the above.
- I've just added another concluding sentence to the above article.
- Would you please make aqnother visit to it for a check up?
- Thanks. --Ludvikus 21:02, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
Would you be so kind as to re-visit the above and consider removing the merge tag?
- I've worked on the stub some more and I think it would be inappropriate to merge it.
- I anticipate about 46 titles/references which use Hidden hand in their title.
- Best regards, --Ludvikus 13:20, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
St. Augustine Confessions Book 8
I didn't know what to do with this micro book report about a part of the Confessions. I edited it as a way of learning a little about St. Augustine. Could it be a fragment of a larger effort? Are there any usage statistics that could be looked at over time? It doesn't seem very useful as is and I have trouble imagining how a user would find it or where links to it would be useful. Any thoughts? DCDuring 13:47, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
- I threw a link to it into the Confessions book report. Maybe that will give someone the idea to expand and upgrade the comprehensive Confessions page and lead to a merge. Let's leave it at that. Is there some kind of tickler to get such a thing reviewed in a year or two? Will there be any usage statistics? DCDuring 14:27, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
Curtis Willkie
A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Curtis Willkie, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. KenWalker | Talk 15:43, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
Note
A tag has been placed on Abundance theory, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.
If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Mattisse 23:12, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
"Oscar Pistorius": {{Height}} template
Hi, you recently applied the {{Height}} template to the infobox for "Oscar Pistorius". It now shows his height as "1.86 m (6 ft 1 in)". The problem is that the source relied on (an American news article) gave his height in feet and inches as "6 ft 1¼ in" – I converted this figure to metres to two decimal places. It means that the figure in metres is less accurate than the figure in feet and inches. Can you fix this? Cheers, Jacklee 13:02, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for promptly fixing the problem! Cheers, Jacklee 13:10, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
Femtochemistry - hope you can help!
Hi GregorB,
Firstly, I must explain that I am VERY new to Wikipedia, and am trying desperately to follow the rules even though I seem to be mussing something up. So I sincerely apologize if I've made extra work for all the editors out there!
I noticed that you deleted an external link to an .pdf of my Femtosecond Micromachining Handbook, which is uploaded to Wikipedia. For some reason everyone is banishing this information, and it is actually a very valuable piece of information on micromachining with femtosecond lasers. (Please be broad-minded with the term "micromachining" as chemicals can also be micromachined.)
At any rate, I long ago removed anything that would be "commercial" from this resource, and wanted to post it on wikipedia because it is so requested by the users of our corporate website. What do I need to do to keep this up? If you read the actual material in the link, you will find it fascinating. I don't want to break anyone's rules, I just want to offer a valuable resource to the community at large. Can you help me get this right?
Thanks!
Taune —Preceding unsigned comment added by Taune (talk • contribs) 13:43, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
Redirect of Dan lodge
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Dan lodge, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Dan lodge is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1).
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Dan lodge, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 13:32, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
Requested move
I have moved P8 pistol to Heckler & Koch P8. Let me know if there are any additional problems. -- RG2 09:57, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:HS Produkt logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:HS Produkt logo.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 20:47, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
Tezija Zararić
Why are you editing that Tezija page? she is very well known and if you google her name you will find loads of information, in fact she is also the #1 artist in her genre in MySpace!
Re: Tezija Zararić
I'm pretty new to wikipedia, so where can i put all those articles, i know there is enough notable information about this girl
afd
AfD nomination of Sony Ericsson Z530
An article that you have been involved in editing, Sony Ericsson Z530, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sony Ericsson Z530. Thank you. Kushalt 14:52, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Quackery
An article that you have been involved in editing, Quackery, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quackery. Thank you. —Whig (talk) 19:33, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
Barnstars for all
|
The Barnstar of Peace | |
| For your work in helping to promote discussion and consensus related to the waterboarding article in a construction manner, I award you this Barnstar of peace. Thanks for all of your hard work. Remember (talk) 20:39, 17 December 2007 (UTC) |
Height
I respect what you applied on the Nonito Donaire article. It's okay but let me tell you something. When it comes to indicating the height of people, especially boxers, I wouldn't consider using the height template. Why is that? True, it mentions units for both English and Metric. But the thing I seem to find wrong is that the Metric part is in meters. Judging by what is commonly seen in media, I noticed that a person's height in Metric is mostly measured in centimeters. This is most definitely the norm and what probably should be followed. FoxLad (talk) 00:04, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
Deprodded by creator. I sent it to afd. Dlohcierekim 01:14, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
The guideline WP:CLS covers the list vs. category thing.
The Transhumanist 05:15, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article M Continuum, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 16:29, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 19:58, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
Deletion
AfD nomination of Average surface temperature
An article that you have been involved in editing, Average surface temperature, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Average surface temperature. Thank you. Raymond Arritt (talk) 21:54, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
Nuclear weapon design
Hi GregorB
Regarding your recent style edits to this article, I have consistently maintained an unconventional practice of bolding every decimal point because on my screen decimal points seem too small to be easily seen. I don't want the reader to mistake 2.4 for 24, say. If this is not permitted, than all the decimals in the article should be unbolded. Likewise with the math format of the three formulas I want to emphasize. You changed one of them. I like the bold font of the math format for all three of them, but all three should have the same format, whatever that is. Would it be ok to restore my consistent formatting? Thanks. HowardMorland (talk) 07:03, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
If you could revisit Hans Thomsen, I think you'll find it should make more sense now. The first version was thrown together in a hurry just because I needed to break the (dubious) redirect. Mangoe (talk) 18:18, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
Chris Britt
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Chris Britt, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Chris Britt. Deb (talk) 20:52, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
- That earlier version is better in NPOV terms, but a bit lacking in detail. Deb (talk) 21:58, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
- That explains a lot! Deb (talk) 22:06, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
Rollback
I've been looking through your contributions and realised you don't have rollback. Would you like me to add it to your account? Rudget 14:31, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
- Done. If you ever need help, you know where I am. Rudget 19:31, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
New Project
Myself and several other editors have been compiling a list of very active editors who would likely be available to help new editors in the event they have questions or concerns. As the list grew and the table became more detailed, it was determined that the best way to complete the table was to ask each potential candidate to fill in their own information, if they so desire. This list is sorted geographically in order to provide a better estimate as to whether the listed editor is likely to be active.
If you consider yourself a very active Wikipedian who is willing to help newcomers, please either complete your information in the table or add your entry. If you do not want to be on the list, either remove your name or just disregard this message and your entry will be removed within 48 hours. The table can be found at User:Useight/Highly Active, as it has yet to have been moved into the Wikipedia namespace. Thank you for your help. Useight (talk) 06:12, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
Regarding this page move: I've been corrected on this issue myself, so I know that the book-naming conventions specify that book titles should be disambiguated by the author's surname only. The relevant guideline is Wikipedia:NC-BK#Standard_disambiguation. --ShelfSkewed Talk 14:32, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
Dear GregorB,
since you once edited, The Tic Code.
I was wondering if you could answer my question on the discussion page underneath dates.
Thanx! AnnieTigerChucky (talk) 21:40, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
WP:HAU has a new format
Due to popular demand, HAU has a new look. Since the changes are so dramatic, I may have made some mistakes when translating the data. Please take a look at WP:HAU/EU and make sure your checkmarks are in the right place and feel free to add or remove some. There is a new feature, SoxBot V, a recently approved bot, automatically updates your online/offline status based on the length of time since your last edit. To allow SoxBot V to do this, you'll need to copy [[Category:Wikipedians who use StatusBot]] to your userpage. Obviously you are not required to add this to your userpage, however, without this, your status will always be "offline" at HAU. Thanks. Useight (talk) 17:17, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
RE: The Tic Code
Dear GregorB,
I added a comment to The Tic Code talk page.
Thanx again! AnnieTigerChucky (talk) 14:19, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
Jewish chess players
Hi! I have found Vladimir Vuković in http://www.jinfo.org/Chess_Players.html with the following notes: Encyclopedia Judaica, Vol. 5 (Keter, Jerusalem, 1972, pp. 401-410) and The Jewish Lists, by Martin H. Greenberg (Schocken Books, New York, 1979, pp. 210-214). -- Shalom, Mibelz 13:26, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:Colossus chess 4 02.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Colossus chess 4 02.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 17:17, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
Hi! Today, I have created two articles on Mladen Šubarić and Andrija Fuderer. Do you know something about Fuderer's ethnic background (Serbian, Croatian, Hungarian, German, or Jewish)? He was born in Subotica, and I have found his name in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Croatians. -- Best wishes, Mibelz (talk) 18:52, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
- Thank you very much for your answer. I have just improved the page. By the way, I think that Andrija Fuderer as well as Max Romih might have been Jewish. -- Shalom, Mibelz 9:04, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Zoey Beckner
An article that you have been involved in editing, Zoey Beckner, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zoey Beckner. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Restepc (talk) 17:45, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
Imena tenisera
Hvala na podršci. Ti korisnici su na mala vrata uveli takozvano pravilo da se uklanjaju naša slova. Hajde da oragnizujemo glasanje po kom bi se to vratilo na svoje mesto, kao što je to slučaj sa svim ostalim ljudima na ovoj enciklopediji. Nisam vičan glasanjima na engleskoj Vikipediji, pa bih te zamolio da vidiš kako bi se to najbolje izvelo. Naravno, bilo bi dobro da ljudi sa hr. Vikipedije dođu ovde i glasaju. --Pockey (talk) 13:27, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
Re: diacritics
I certainly will inform you if I should notice a discussion taking place somewhere. As things are at the moment, I expect that user:Ev (also supportive of these measures) will send me a note informing me of the debate, which I will gladly pass onto you. Indeed, if the matter should come to a vote then it will be in the interests of all three of us to support the diacritic usage. Obviously, you and I do not need to convince each other of the positive reasons for their appearance as that would be "preaching to the converted." Thanks for the note of encouragement, and remember that I too often roam the site like a headless chicken in search of inspiration, and not knowing where to go one minute to the next. So if you stumble across this debate before I do, or any other of similar nature, please drop a line on my talk page. Many thanks. Evlekis (talk) 20:20, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
- One more quick note, I noticed your recent contributions on some Croatian football players, adding (now Croatia) to the country. That too is something which I wholly support. With me, it has always been the other way, I've always favoured the inclusion of the country of birth at the time of birth; but I definitely support the mention of the present-day land. The only concern with "(now Croatia)" regarding these active footballers is that their place of birth was Croatia then aswell, not the Republic of of course, because that was created in 1991, but the Socialist Republic of certainly. So one positive possibility is to say (eg. born March 19, 1984 in Sarajevo, SR Bosnia and Herzegovina, Yugoslavia); likewise, you could make the present republic more focal (born August 3, 1974 in Sinj, Croatia {formerly Yugoslavia}). You can indeed keep them as they are, it won't hurt, but it does make them look slightly as if Croatia was not in existence when it fact it was. Look back to the past century, the only time Croatia - as with the other republics - did not formally exist was between 1929 (when the constitution banished all political parties and created new administrative units) and 1939 when a Croatian banovina was reinstated. So if we are discussing anyone born, for instance, in 1933: we could say (born in Skoplje <to reflect name at the time; Kingdom of Yugoslavia {now Macedonia}) with some accuracy. But this is just my advice, nothing official; I was only thinking along your line of interest in wishing to see Croatia better highlighted. Evlekis (talk) 20:34, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
- They (the Croatian editors) still form a necessary majority sometimes, but so do Serbs elsewhere. Across the field, you get similar scenarios involving the Middle East, Africa, South America, the Pacific Islands, and anywhere else there has been some form of conflict these past years: fresh in everyone's mind. The best thing is for all of us to keep away from it, but we can't resist the temptation to "follow the force of gravity" at times, such as when our issues make the Main Page on Wikipedia. About your suggestion - Croatian businessman etc. - I think that it is absolutely fine and would support it. After all, encyclopaedias are all about delivering information in the form of grammatical and intelligible text. If something takes a little longer to explain, then no problem, we go ahead and do it! As long as the outside reader is fully in the picture, you can use an entire paragraph to explain a circumstance.
- One more quick note, I noticed your recent contributions on some Croatian football players, adding (now Croatia) to the country. That too is something which I wholly support. With me, it has always been the other way, I've always favoured the inclusion of the country of birth at the time of birth; but I definitely support the mention of the present-day land. The only concern with "(now Croatia)" regarding these active footballers is that their place of birth was Croatia then aswell, not the Republic of of course, because that was created in 1991, but the Socialist Republic of certainly. So one positive possibility is to say (eg. born March 19, 1984 in Sarajevo, SR Bosnia and Herzegovina, Yugoslavia); likewise, you could make the present republic more focal (born August 3, 1974 in Sinj, Croatia {formerly Yugoslavia}). You can indeed keep them as they are, it won't hurt, but it does make them look slightly as if Croatia was not in existence when it fact it was. Look back to the past century, the only time Croatia - as with the other republics - did not formally exist was between 1929 (when the constitution banished all political parties and created new administrative units) and 1939 when a Croatian banovina was reinstated. So if we are discussing anyone born, for instance, in 1933: we could say (born in Skoplje <to reflect name at the time; Kingdom of Yugoslavia {now Macedonia}) with some accuracy. But this is just my advice, nothing official; I was only thinking along your line of interest in wishing to see Croatia better highlighted. Evlekis (talk) 20:34, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
Evlekis (talk) 08:51, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
Hello yet again. I regretfully inform you that the bot we were using to update the user status at Wikipedia:Highly Active Users, SoxBot V, was blocked for its constant updating. With this bot out of operation, a patch is in the works. Until that patch is reviewed and accepted by the developers, some options have been presented to use as workarounds: 1) Qui monobook (not available in Internet Explorer); 2) User:Hersfold/StatusTemplate; 3) Manually updating User:StatusBot/Status/USERNAME; or 4) Not worry about it and wait for the patch to go through, which hopefully won't take long. If you have another method, you can use that, too. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Useight (talk) 22:21, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks for the new information, I shall see what is going on and then make a contribution. About the listing of Croatia & Yugoslavia, I guess you are right that there are many ways to do this and they all meet with some disapproval, if not by one person then another. No we cannot please everyone. It is impossible isn't it? Bruno represented Yugoslavia and he is a Croat. That was the nature of Yugoslavia, six primary nations and a multitude of smaller groups; not the same as Italy where-by you're seen to be Italian if you are from Piedmont and if you are from Sicily. Their most remote population is perhaps the Sardinian people who largely identify as Sardinian. Big problem. Many people actually struggle to grasp the difference between nationality (ethnicity) and nationality (relationship to state). So how about stating that Bruno is a Croatian former athlete who represented (past tense) Yugoslavia when Croatia formed a part of it. The 1991 aspect is very tricky. For one, we don't know in which month he retired, and for another, when do we begin to regard Croatia as independent? My birthday (June 25)? Three months later following an agreement with Western Europe? Or early 1992 when it entered the UN and was formally recognised by the "bulk" of governments? Football is a bit easier as Croatia formed its national side in 1990: it existed one way or another, even if it did not immediately join FIFA and UEFA. I suggest we try to experiment with Bruno Orešar until we can present it in a way that it explains evertyhting, and you ofcourse are satisfied with it. As for the very listing of "Yugoslavia", yes it pains me to see people constantly removing it and I am grateful that many non-local Wikipedians are assertive in restoring the deleted information. We call it historical accuracy. What they need to realise is that this applies to the world over, be it defunct lands such as the USSR or countries whose status has changed, such as the one time Kingdoms of Albania or Italy. For most opponents of this policy, the reasons are often personal: read the edit summary and you find comments such as "country doesn't exist any more", or "don't insult my man by adding that shit country to it." You see Gregor, history is history and you and I can no more change it than we can predict the future. Our dissidents here will have to grow up. I see no reason to be bitter: Croatia prospered very well in the 1960's and the "dark years" involved the break-up itself and the aftermath. Quite literally, the "troubles" as people know them were for the 1991-1995 period. It marred early independence; now if a full scale conflict occured at a different time, such as 1976-1981 (like Zimbabwe's Gukarahunda, 1982-87), with Croatia still destined to split in 1991, then fair enough, people are justified in their reasons for dislike, but even then, it is silly to disclude the mention of "Yugoslavia". But then again, one thing I have noticed over the past two or three years is that no reputable Wikipedian has advocated the disclusion of Yugosolavia, it is normally the members of the "Anonymity Liberation Army" (IP numbers) who play this game, normally without ever adding comments. Even some of the Croatian, Bosnian & Macedonian heavyweights tend to leave that side of things alone. There have been a few Albanians who have objected to the inclusions of Cyrillic spellings on name of Kosovans born before independence, and those who altogether reject the mention of Yugoslavia. In most cases, they have been persuaded to accept the status quo. But going back to those heavyweights, I only wish that they could present their cases more objectively rather than give the articles one-sided angles: this is where conflict is the subject. I hate having to remove "POV" usages and it worries me that some smart swine will revert it back to say "Group A was innocent, never did anything wrong, woke up on the wrong side of bed one morning, and was subsequently slaughtered by Group B", or similar scenarios. I'm curious also to know just how many editors out there know that I am 100% non-allined to any party. I hope you believe that my edits are not aimed at promoting a specific view!! :) Evlekis (talk) 18:57, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
Near Duplicate Algorithms
The page Near Duplicate Algorithms is, I think, a pretty clear copyright violation. I've given the link on the talk page for that article. I'm not a very experienced editor so I don't want to delete the page myself. Could you do it? best, Sam nead (talk) 16:17, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
Lion-Man Dating
You're right, I double-checked the museum and it was a mis-understanding of whoever originally categorized Lion Man. It was in fact 32,000 years old, which would put him at approximately 30,000 BC. I have updated the links accordingly. Thanks. Keithh (talk) 22:21, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the lead, I see you just left a comment on the diacritics page. Mine (which I started writing before you posted yours) has just been saved. So obviously, it is not a "response" to you (see we are agreed) but an addition. Thanks. Evlekis (talk) 13:31, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
Diacritics continued
This is getting tricky. I see it as having to go down to a vote for the tennis and the other places. We don't seem to be able to convince the anti-diacritic mob of the reasons to keep them, and I doubt they will change your position any more than mine. All I seem to read is this pathetic thesis that "it is common not to use diacritics", yet so far, nobody has proven that the plain form (without diacritics) really is standard English. It is only the standard of certain media. I don't think the fight is lost, there are as yet other corners which we havn't explored: in the fullness of time, I will introduce them into the debates. First of all, the correctness of any language has a number of approaches. Most scholars categorise these as being one of prescriptivism, where-by there is one correct form as is "prescribed" by intellects, and its opposite descriptivism, where-by its adherents "describe" usage but are viewed as subversive by the prescriptive party, as their attitude is "anything goes". In reality, people are drawn into some tug-of-war between these schools of thought even though one is 100% incompatible with the other. These discrepancies are further hampered by the fact that English, unlike French, does not have an academy or federation which imposes "correct" language, not that it would prevent change had it existed. The diacritic debate initially appears as though it needs to consult an authority. That "authority" is not there for anyone, and so when it comes to linguistic elements which are more fixed than others (such as spellings), one consults the dictionary. English, as you know, contains words, names and even phrases from hundreds of languages, and all in everyday use. As it happens, the nation's favourites (in the UK), Oxford, Longmans, Collins and Chambers all give both variations of a word or name, with and without the diacritics. The primary spot is with the diacritics, the dictionaries are littered with these foreign marks and the introductions even explain what they are, their name and how they function, and all for English. Modern dictionaries are themselves "articles of confusion", for although they insist that certain things are "incorrect", they move with the times and allow other aspects to be "flexible among variations". That's another story though. The fact is that this will prove conclusively that diacritics are very much a part of English, and may even set a precendent for Brittanica and National Geograhic as you have mentioned. Of course, one can argue the opposite and cite that English is a "free" language with no dictates (hence the discriptive approach), but that too still permits diacritics. So, foreign names enter the language; some writers use the name as in the local written language; no attempt is made elsewhere by anyone to transcribe the name so as to Anglicise it; the remaining media continue to use the names, without the diacritics. Were the diacritics removed? Or did the editor simply type /s/ (situated between /a/ and /d/ on his keyboard as opposed to first selecting HR on the language menu, followed by hitting a key on the far right of the keyboard) instead of /š/? If a writer is not using his editing influence to introduce a new spelling form which is Anglo-friendly, it is plain that he doesn't honestly care. Do we, with better knowledge, look to these people for inspiration on "how to stylise names in English"? It is crazy. Evlekis (talk) 12:49, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
- Hang fire Gregor, don't give in. They havn't heard the last of me yet. Evlekis (talk) 20:34, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Scott Vickaryous
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Scott Vickaryous, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? KenWalker | Talk 23:26, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
WP:HAU, Status, and you!
As you may know, the StatusBot responsible for maintaining the status of the Highly Active Users was taken offline. We now have a replacement in the Qui status system. This semi-automatic system will allow you to easily update your status page found at Special:Mypage/Status which the HAU page code is now designed to read from. If you are already using Qui (or a compatible system) - great! - no action is needed (other than remembering to update your status as necessary). If not, consider installing Qui. You can also manually update this status by changing the page text to online, offline, or busy. While it is not mandatory, the nature of HAU is that people are often seeking a quick answer from someone who is online and keeping our statuses up-to-date will assist with this. Note if you were previously using your /Status page as something other than a one-word status indicator, your HAU entry may have been set to "status=n" to correct display issues. Please clear this parameter if you change things to be "HAU compatible". Further questions can be raised at WT:HAU. This message was delivered by xenobot 23:05, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
Broad claim on Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo wasn't from 2006
That broad claim you removed was recently added by Cryptonsage and not added in 2006. Good thing you caught it though. :) --Edward Sandstig (talk) 08:21, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the formatting improvement - I had a feeling there would be some way to make it look smarter, and I'll now know for another time! Hope you found the article interesting: I fell over it randomly while stubsorting and got interested. PamD (talk) 17:55, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
Baader-Meinhof phenomenon
I just noticed that your comment on PamD's talk page about Baader-Meinhof phenomenon comes directly below me remarking on another instance of the phenomenon - both about Muphry's Law. Since I didn't know or had forgotten then name of the phenomenon, it seems we have a case of second-order Baader-Meinhof! Olaf Davis | Talk 17:12, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
Rock music WikiProject
I'd like to invite you to join the newly-formed Rock music WikiProject. There's alot of Rock-related articles on Wikipedia that could use a little attention, and I hope this project can help organize an effort to improve them. So please, take a look and if you like what you see, help us get this project off the ground and a few Rock music pages into the front ranks of Wikipedia articles. Thanks! --Be Black Hole Sun (talk) 08:57, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
Krajan
Oh sorry Gregor. I stumbled across the article some time back and only wanted to put his birth details closer to his name. If his place of birth cannot be acertained, then by all means revert it to where he is a resident, or based. I took a liberty there with no real knowledge. Evlekis (talk) 07:54, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for updating it! A few times I had started to do that myself but never quite finished... Interesting... up to 49 days now, still a ton of edits but it seems to have slowed a bit, as you say. Thanks again for updating it! κaτaʟavenoTC 03:01, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
Modern Firearms?
I believe that category is too vaguely defined and would involve too many unrelated designs. I don't think it serves any purpose. Koalorka (talk) 16:47, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
Zagreb task force
If you're interested in being a member of the Zagreb task force of WikiProject Croatia, [[please support it :-) Admiral Norton (talk) 21:26, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks. Admiral Norton (talk) 21:36, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
A proposal for the project page is available at User:Admiral Norton/Zagreb. You can add your name in the participants list. Admiral Norton (talk) 21:58, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
Moving shouting match
I understand that the article is more suitable for a dictionary instead of an encyclopedia. But I expected it to just start that way and then be expanded with more information. -- IRP (talk) 01:29, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
- Please check User_talk:IRP#Re:_Moving_shouting_match —Preceding unsigned comment added by IRP (talk • contribs) 23:21, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
Date autoformatting
Thanks for your comments. The reason I changed the format to day/month is because that is the international format, and I thought the Windows series of articles to have an international flavour rather than American. US-centric articles retain their month/day format, of course. If I have got this wrong, I apologise. -TonyW (talk) 19:18, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
- I understand the criteria you laid out in your reply, and have been trying to follow that format. It would seem, therefore, the Windows articles may come under the mdy format because of their ties to Microsoft, which is US based. I never thought of it like that as I was looking at the articles as a whole, and since Windows is used internationally, I thought they should be in the dmy format. -TonyW (talk) 19:48, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
Request
Hey! I am sorry i just edited the wiki page on Normal Forms [[Database normalization] adding just a minor reference! It looks kind messy now xp. If you could take a look. ;) thanks... xp —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fathergod (talk • contribs) 18:22, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
Redirect of Cyril sneer
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Cyril sneer, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Cyril sneer is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1).
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Cyril sneer, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 18:40, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
Dozen
"dirty dozen" as you can see has numerous meanings. Anything you have to say about "your" dirty dozen is probably best added to Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants which is quite a short article. If you really feel a separate article is needed, then try dirty dozen (Stockholm Convention) as a title. — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 16:35, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
Sorry. Just noticed that you did not start it. Now moved to dirty dozen (Stockholm Convention). — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 16:39, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
Heya, I've noticed you've been contributing to articles similar to mine, i.e. related to activist/anarchist people. My article on Bruno Masse is threatened of deletion, could you please vote to keep it? You can vote [| here]. In solidarity! Lkeryl (talk) 18:32, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
Voting
Hi. You've participated in the debate about deleting of category:Former Towns of RSK 1991-95 [1]. Now, there's a similar voting on deletion on the article (created, although the results of discussion was delete, not listify). The links to the voting is here merger suggestion?. Since you've participated previously in the discussion, you're invited to participate again. Please, give your opinion. Kubura (talk) 14:33, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
fractions
I reversed your change to the 1 1/16 fraction at Princess Elizabeth Stakes (Canada). That format could be a great help but you need to check this out as it comes up as a glaring font several times larger than that used by Wikipedia. Thanx. Handicapper (talk) 13:14, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
- Windows Explorer Handicapper (talk) 14:55, 2 November 2008 (UTC). My Explorer is the latest version and as I said, the fraction is HUGE. Handicapper (talk) 13:15, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
Richter Scale
I think the table with corresponding joules is incorrect —Preceding unsigned comment added byUTS cob (talk • contribs) 03:55, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
The "in use" tag is designed to reduce editing conflicts. Please respect it. ciao Rotational (talk) 17:57, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
Secure Digital
I note you deleted my reference to ebay. Can you clarify why? A list of the active listings of flash memory, showing that SD has approximately 10 times the listings of any other technology seems to agree with my assertion that SD has become the dominant form of flash media. Thanks. --Speedevil (talk) 01:27, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
CfD nomination of Category:Machine guns by caliber
Category:Machine guns by caliber, along with its sub-categories which you appear to have created, have been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Cgingold (talk) 13:40, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
| This is an archive of past discussions about User:GregorB. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |