User talk:Gsmgm/sandbox

Welcome!

Hello, Gsmgm, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! 81.228.159.212 (talk) 15:24, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have new messages template

You have new messages (last change)

test —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.244.196.90 (talk) 21:38, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

June 2009

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. In the future, it is recommended that you use the preview button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, reduces edit conflicts, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Thank you. Gsmgm (talk) 19:36, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

September 2009 huggle-use self scrutiny

Reverts:

4 blanking [1] [2] [3] [4]

2 deletion [5] [6]

4 BLP violation [7] entire section had three references, two of them was blogs [8] [9]

9 false revert [10] was this information reliable? [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17]

2 shouting (use of all caps) [18] [19]

17 vandalism [20] [21] [22] [23] [24] [25] [26] [27] [28] [29] [30] [31] [32] [33] [34] [35] [36]

1 maintenace template removal [37]

4 POV violation [38] [39] [40] or unsourced WP:OR

1 unecessary explanation? [41]

1 unecessary edit [42]

1 wikitable removed [43]

2 unsourced [44] [45]

1 suspected death by wikipedia [46]

2 Wikipedia:Manual of Style [47] [48]

1 spam [49]

1 original reaserch [50]

1 use of mainspace as forum [51]

Conclusion: Of the 54 edits checked 10 were dubious, which amounts to ca 18.5% erroneous edits under huggle. If quite a few and a few can be defined as more than 25% respectively less than 10% then my edit faults with huggle would fall in between the assumed definitions. Therefore 88.112.189.85 (talk)s arguments of my faulty edits on my main talkpage is false but narrowly.