User talk:Gurpartaap11

Your use of multiple Wikipedia accounts

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Gurpartaap11, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

SH 15:17, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Naam Simram Section of Islam and Sikhism

I have deleted it it's probably the most unencyclopaedic section to any Sikh article I have read. You must try and read the WP:Manual of Style and also read WP:Reliable. Thanks SH 17:42, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2014

This is your last warning. The next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Sikhism, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. SH 08:08, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Islam and Sikhism, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. SH 08:13, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Islam and Sikhism shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. SH 09:03, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]