User talk:GymnasioArgos

Welcome!

Hello, GymnasioArgos! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Doug Weller talk 05:32, 16 May 2019 (UTC) Getting Started Contributing to Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article The five pillars of Wikipedia • Simplified ruleset How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions Directories and indexes Where to: ask questions • make requests Tip of the day Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style (Simplified) • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists The Signpost (Wikipedia's newspaper) Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Please do not accuse other editors of sabotage

You should read WP:AGF. Doug Weller talk 05:33, 16 May 2019 (UTC)

I don't understand why I should assume good faith when I was accused of bad faith editing. --GymnasioArgos (talk) 03:31, 28 May 2019 (UTC)

GymnasioArgos, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi GymnasioArgos! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like 78.26 (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:07, 16 May 2019 (UTC)

May 2019

Your recent editing history at Dog training shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. – bradv🍁 02:15, 28 May 2019 (UTC)

Hello, GymnasioArgos,

Bradv is quite correct. If you continue to revert edits on this article you will receive a block. Please work out your differences with other editors on the article talk page. This can seem time-consuming but it is how Wikipedia has worked for 18 years. Please be patient, Wikipedia is not in a hurry...we'd rather get things done correctly and have it take a while than be speedy and wrong. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:58, 28 May 2019 (UTC)

This is so confusing because he's allowed to repeatedly undo my edits and accuse me of bad faith, but I'm the one who will get in trouble? I'm not initiating this. If I'm getting sanctioned for an edit war, then I expect that I will not be the only one sanctioned. It also causes me concern that I feel Bradv was the one who initiated this edit war and they're the one issuing a sanction for me standing up for the good faith and quality of my edits.--GymnasioArgos (talk) 04:03, 28 May 2019 (UTC)

GymnasioArgos, come discuss the actual article, at Talk:Dog training. No one's getting sanctioned here. – bradv🍁 04:09, 28 May 2019 (UTC)

The lead should summarise the article

See WP:LEAD. So you need to propose a section in the article discussing other training methods, using only sources that discuss those training methods and show how they differ. You can't start by changing the lead. Don't even worry about the lead until the article contains the content you think is appropriate. Doug Weller talk 06:37, 28 May 2019 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi GymnasioArgos! You created a thread called Editor keeps deleting my edits and has three alternative acounts at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread. Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 31 May 2019 (UTC)