User talk:H669617

This is H669617's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sri Selva Vinayagar Temple (August 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HitroMilanese was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Presented sources are not reliable.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sri Selva Vinayagar Temple and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hitro talk 08:25, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Presented sources are from the official website and has now been fixed. H669617 (talk) 12:29, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, H669617! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Hitro talk 08:25, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sri Selva Vinayagar Temple (August 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Rich Smith were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

We need to see reliable secondary sources, not just those that the template publishes on their website...

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sri Selva Vinayagar Temple and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

- Rich^T|C|E-Mail 13:16, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

About your inappropriate usage of user talk pages

Hey H669617, please stop posting messages on the talk pages of every AfC reviewer who's assessed one of your drafts. It is generally disruptive, and probably won't succeed in getting your drafts reviewed any faster. Your messages are also fairly aggressive; I'd advise you to make sure you understand Wikipedia's policy on civility. I'm happy to answer any questions you might have about this, provided we can engage in a calm, constructive discussion. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 15:45, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @TechnoSquirrel69The questioning about articles that do not meet the Wikipedia policy, such as no references , and are still kept approved and not declined is fair and not inappropriate. (For example, the Shri Sidhi Vinayagar Temple - Wikipedia. However, if fair action, such as removing articles with no references, is not done by Wikipedia Editors and Bots, then the users have the right to ask. Thank you. H669617 (talk) 17:48, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@H669617: You absolutely have the right to ask these questions, but the talk pages of AfC reviewers are not appropriate places for those discussions. You can ask questions like this at the Teahouse, where experienced editors will help you resolve the issue you're having. Also, anyone can contribute to Wikipedia, so if you see an issue with a Wikipedia article, consider taking steps to address the problem yourself! —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 18:07, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sri Selva Vinayagar Temple (August 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by HitroMilanese were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Presented sources prove that this temple exists but fails to establish notability. Please see WP:GNG and introduce sources accordingly.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sri Selva Vinayagar Temple and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hitro talk 08:08, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, discussion pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at User talk:TechnoSquirrel69, is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 02:07, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions are appreciated, but, in this edit to Sri Selva Vinayagar Temple, you removed Articles for deletion notices from articles or removed other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates. This makes it difficult to establish consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Knowledgegatherer23 (Say Hello) 15:36, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Alalch E.. I noticed that you recently removed content from Draft:Sa Re Ga Ma Pa Keralam Season 2 without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. —Alalch E. 16:06, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sri Selva Vinayagar Temple for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sri Selva Vinayagar Temple is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sri Selva Vinayagar Temple until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

—TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 04:12, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Tiburon Sharks Pirece

I'm not sure what you are going for, but "tiburon" simply means "shark". The draft itself is more like an essay or reflection than anything else, and it is not verified by reliable sources. In light of your other contributions I urge you to be more aware of what Wikipedia is and what we are trying to do here. Drmies (talk) 16:02, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Drmies: It's just a hoax, and H669617 has also made edits to Draft:Tiburon Sharks which is also a hoax, but about something completely different (non-existent sports club). Hard to say what's going on.—Alalch E. 16:32, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Alalch E.. I might just have to put a stop to this. Drmies (talk) 16:34, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Tiburon Sharks Pirece

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing hoaxes, such as Draft:Tiburon Sharks Pirece, is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —Alalch E. 16:09, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Drmies (talk) 16:39, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Drmies Could you please tell me how my editing was categorised as abusive?? I am just editing articles and it is the wiki bots who abuse my work, by lying that I do not have any references or notability! H669617 (talk) 16:59, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oh dear, I don't know where to start. Drmies (talk) 18:51, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]