Jump to content

User talk:HIM707

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

HIM707 (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Requested username:

Request reason:

I was not aware of the sock puppetry rule. I will not use other accounts anymore. I want to say that I was doing everything in good faith as the article "Buchal Kalan" was created almost fully by me. I didn't find it appropriate that some random person just came in and started reverting information that I had contributed. Simply put, over 90% of the article: "Buchal Kalan" was created by me. So it does not seem appropriate that someone with 0 knowledge about the subject just came in and started reverting the information. All in all, I apologize for the sock puppetry as I was not aware of the rule. I would be more than happy to delete my other accounts if possible. Thank you.

Decline reason:

You surely didn't need to know specifically about WP:SOCK to know your behaviour was breathtakingly inappropriate? Falsely claiming you did everything in good faith shows we need to leave you blocked. I have rarely seen someone act in such obvious bad faith in my time here and I'm stunned at your gall with this unblock request. Yamla (talk) 09:38, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You are not permitted to remove or edit declined unblock requests for your currently active block. You must not do so again. --Yamla (talk) 22:06, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You were warned to not remove declined unblock requests after you removed it. Because you preceded to remove the unblock request again and remove the comment by Yamla over multiple edits, then post an unblock request shows you either are acting in bad faith or simply don't understand. I am revoking your talk page access. If the next administrator declines your new unblock request your next route of appeal is WP:UTRS. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 23:19, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Also your use of User:HBI371 to evade your block just minutes before the new unblock request just adds to the reasons why I agree with Yamla that we need to leave you blocked. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 23:31, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

HIM707 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

From now one, I won't use other wikipedia accounts. I am more than happy to delete by other accounts if possible. I apologize for sock puppeting and will not do so again. HIM707 (talk) 22:56, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇 23:34, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user is likely de-facto banned at this point, under WP:3X. Note additionally this user engaged in block evasion as Notme7 and went out of their way to lie about it. --Yamla (talk) 13:04, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Madura, Buchal Kalan (October 17)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Snowycats were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Snowycats (talk) 16:33, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, HIM707! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Snowycats (talk) 16:33, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Madura, Buchal kalan

[edit]

Hello, HIM707. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Madura".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 21:11, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Madura, Buchal Kalan

[edit]

Information icon Hello, HIM707. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Madura, Buchal Kalan, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:01, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Madura, Buchal Kalan

[edit]

Hello, HIM707. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Madura".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! S0091 (talk) 16:48, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]