User talk:HNS Counselors for Bitcoin Suisse capo

June 2018[edit]

There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group or a web site, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In that reason, you must:

Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Yunshui ^雲 _水 15:23, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

HNS Counselors for Bitcoin Suisse capo (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

On behalf of Bitcoin Suisse my goal is to update the article about Bitcoin Suisse, add information, improve the sources and make the structure of the article clearer. It is not my intention to add promotional content or advertisement but rather to write a neutral article that is well documented with open sources, especially newspaper articles. The current article is clearly outdated and thus has to be updated. My user name clearly indicates that Bitcoin Suisse has asked HNS Counselors to update the Wikipedia article about Bitcoin Suisse. "capo" indicates that this is not a Wikipedia user account used by several people but only me, "HNS Counselors for Bitcoin Suisse capo" (capo is my nickname). Thus, the account is only for one person and only one person is using the account.

Decline reason:

None of that is acceptable. Please see WP:USERNAME, WP:COI, WP:PAID, and WP:PROMO. Yamla (talk) 15:47, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

July 2018[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

HNS Counselors for Bitcoin Suisse capo (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi In my opinion, the account has not been used for promotion and the account is for just one person: Account has not been used for advertising or promotion - The article on Bitcoin Suisse that I provided does not read like an advertisement. It does not use sales-oriented language. It is free of puffery. Instead, it is factual and written from a neutral point of view. The article is verifiable with independent, third-party sources. In my opinion, the article is a constructive contribution to Wikipedia and a legitimate article about a commercial entity. - No inappropriate links to other websites are inserted. Account is for just one person - The username does not unambiguously represent the name of a company. Instead, the username clearly indicates that Bitcoin Suisse contracted me and our company to contribute to the Bitcoin Suisse Wikipedia article. The last part of the username “capo” shows that this is not a shared account but a personal account, “capo” being my personal nickname. Thus, the username complies with Wikipedia’s username policy as stated under section “Username implying shared use”. There, it says: “However, usernames are acceptable if they contain a company or group name but are clearly intended to denote an individual person, such as "Mark at WidgetsUSA", "Jack Smith at the XY Foundation", "WidgetFan87", etc.” It is clearly declared that Bitcoin Suisse contracted me and our company to contribute to the Bitcoin Suisse Wikipedia article - According to section 2.2 of Wikipedia’s conflict of interest policy, I have to declare who is paying me, who the client is, and any other relevant role or relationship. In my opinion, I have complied with this policy as I have clearly stated my role on my user page as well as on Bitcoin Suisse’s talk page, using official templates provided by Wikipedia. - According to section 2.2 of Wikipedia’s conflict of interest policy, it is encouraged to propose changes to an article on the article’s talk page. I have done this several weeks ago, suggesting to other users that the article is clearly outdated and needs to be updated. However, no other user has updated Bitcoin Suisse’s article so far and the article is still outdated. Thus, I kindly ask you to unblock my account. Regards, HNS Counselors for Bitcoin Suisse capo (talk) 09:17, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Yeah, no. Please do not engage in debate. Please acknowledge acceptance of of unblock conditions or remain blocked. As you are obviously acting on behalf of the company and have only one interest-- writing about said company-- I see no way forward for you to be unblocked.

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

-- Dlohcierekim (talk) 13:49, 13 July 2018 (UTC)}}[reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

HNS Counselors for Bitcoin Suisse capo (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #22051 was submitted on Jul 13, 2018 14:35:35. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 14:35, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

HNS Counselors for Bitcoin Suisse capo (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi In my opinion, the account has not been used for promotion and the account is for just one person:

Account has not been used for advertising or promotion

- The article on Bitcoin Suisse that I provided does not read like an advertisement. It does not use sales-oriented language. It is free of puffery. Instead, it is factual and written from a neutral point of view. The article is verifiable with independent, third-party sources. In my opinion, the article is a constructive contribution to Wikipedia and a legitimate article about a commercial entity.

- No inappropriate links to other websites are inserted.

Account is for just one person

- The username does not unambiguously represent the name of a company. Instead, the username clearly indicates that Bitcoin Suisse contracted me and our company to contribute to the Bitcoin Suisse Wikipedia article. The last part of the username “capo” shows that this is not a shared account but a personal account, “capo” being my personal nickname. Thus, the username complies with Wikipedia’s username policy as stated under section “Username implying shared use”. There, it says: “However, usernames are acceptable if they contain a company or group name but are clearly intended to denote an individual person, such as "Mark at WidgetsUSA", "Jack Smith at the XY Foundation", "WidgetFan87", etc.”

It is clearly declared that Bitcoin Suisse contracted me and our company to contribute to the Bitcoin Suisse Wikipedia article

- According to section 2.2 of Wikipedia’s conflict of interest policy, I have to declare who is paying me, who the client is, and any other relevant role or relationship. In my opinion, I have complied with this policy as I have clearly stated my role on my user page as well as on Bitcoin Suisse’s talk page, using official templates provided by Wikipedia. - According to section 2.2 of Wikipedia’s conflict of interest policy, it is encouraged to propose changes to an article on the article’s talk page. I have done this several weeks ago, suggesting to other users that the article is clearly outdated and needs to be updated. However, no other user has updated Bitcoin Suisse’s article so far and the article is still outdated.

Thus, I kindly ask you to unblock my account. Regards, HNS Counselors for Bitcoin Suisse capo (talk) 06:55, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You just repeating the same request will not give you a different result. As you are only here to work for your client, you won't be unblocked. As you are not willing to accept the conditions laid out for you to be unblocked and just repeating the substance of your request, I am removing talk page access. If you change your mind, you may use WP:UTRS to request unblock. 331dot (talk) 07:13, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.