User talk:HaEr48/Archives/2019/September
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
WikiCup 2019 September newsletter
The fourth round of the competition has finished in a flurry of last minute activity, with 454 points being required to qualify for the final round. It was a hotly competitive round with two contestants with over 400 points being eliminated, and all but two of the finalists having achieved an FA during the round. Casliber, our 2016 winner, was the highest point-scorer, followed by Enwebb and Lee Vilenski, who are both new to the competition. In fourth place was SounderBruce, a finalist last year. But all those points are swept away as we start afresh for the final round.
Round 4 saw the achievement of 11 featured articles. In addition, Adam Cuerden scored with 18 FPs, Lee Vilenski led the GA score with 8 GAs while Kosack performed 15 GA reviews. There were around 40 DYKs, 40 GARs and 31 GAs overall during round 4. Even though contestants performed more GARs than they achieved GAs, there was still some frustration at the length of time taken to get articles reviewed.
As we start round 5, we say goodbye to the eight competitors who didn't quite make it; thank you for the useful contributions you have made to the Cup and Wikipedia, and we hope you will join us again next year. Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them (some people have fallen foul of this rule and the points have been removed).
If you are concerned that your nomination, whether it be for a good article, a featured process, or anything else, will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66, Vanamonde and Cwmhiraeth MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:44, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Muhammad III of Granada
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Muhammad III of Granada you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Gog the Mild -- Gog the Mild (talk) 21:01, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Muhammad III of Granada
The article Muhammad III of Granada you nominated as a good article has passed 
; see Talk:Muhammad III of Granada for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Gog the Mild -- Gog the Mild (talk) 17:42, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
Halo!
Halo, bang :) Mohon izin mengganggu waktu abang sebentar.
Akhir-akhir ini saya sedang menyusun draf artikel, dan rencananya saya kepingin bisa mencapai kriteria GA/FA di enwiki. Tapi saya khawatir bahwa keterbacaan/kenyamanan pembacaannya nggak dapet, dan (jangan-jangan) ada indikasi riset asli. Jika ada sedikit waktu, kritik konstruktif dalam bentuk apapun akan sangat berharga. Semoga saya bisa belajar sedikit dari pengalaman abang selama menominasikan GA dan FA di enwiki. Terima kasih bang! Dhio-270599 15:42, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
- @Dhio270599: Wah, mantap! Aku baru baca sekilas, menurutku sudah bagus (terutama untuk pemula) dan tidak ada yang kesalahan fatal
. Nanti aku baca lebih teliti lagi dan ikut komentar di peer reviewnya. Btw, mumpung masih baru, bisa diusulkan di WP:DYKN sehingga akan tampil di halaman utama. Syarat tampil di situ jauh lebih rendah dibanding syarat GA, asalkan diusulkan dalam <7 hari setelah artikel dibuat. Saranku usulkan sekarang aja, sebelum waktu 7 harinya lewat. Kalau ada pertanyaan jangan segan-segan ya HaEr48 (talk) 14:16, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
- Terima kasih sudah diapresiasi, bang
Untuk DYKN, saya takut nggak memenuhi syarat tujuh harinya, karena riwayat suntingan2 sebelumnya dari bak pasir saya juga terbawa. Di riwayatnya juga belum memenuhi perkembangan lima kali ukuran dalam tujuh hari... jadi sepertinya belum untuk sekarang ini. Tapi terima kasih sudah bersedia meninjau artikelnya, bang! Dhio-270599 01:06, 8 August 2019 (UTC)
- @Dhio270599: 7 harinya dihitung dari pemindahan ke mainspace. Lihat WP:DYKRULES: Articles that have been worked on exclusively in a user or user talk subpage or at articles for creation or in the Draft namespace and then moved (or in some cases pasted) to the article mainspace are considered new as of the date they reach the mainspace. HaEr48 (talk) 01:10, 8 August 2019 (UTC)
- Mohon maaf, bang --- ternyata saya baru tahu sekarang, mohon maaf sebelumya tidak memperhatikan.
Agak sayang sebenarnya nggak jadi masuk DYK... Dhio-270599 10:21, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
- Halo bang, mohon izin mengabarkan; sesuai saran sebelumnya, artikel tersebut sudah dinominasikan untuk DYK. Terima kasih sebelumnya Dhio-270599 03:01, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
- @Dhio270599: Wah, selamat! DYK nya pun udah diapprove . Aku ada tambahan komentar di DYKnya, silakan dilihat. HaEr48 (talk) 14:11, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
- @Dhio270599: Wah, selamat! DYK nya pun udah diapprove
- Halo bang, mohon izin mengabarkan; sesuai saran sebelumnya, artikel tersebut sudah dinominasikan untuk DYK. Terima kasih sebelumnya
- Mohon maaf, bang --- ternyata saya baru tahu sekarang, mohon maaf sebelumya tidak memperhatikan.
- @Dhio270599: 7 harinya dihitung dari pemindahan ke mainspace. Lihat WP:DYKRULES: Articles that have been worked on exclusively in a user or user talk subpage or at articles for creation or in the Draft namespace and then moved (or in some cases pasted) to the article mainspace are considered new as of the date they reach the mainspace. HaEr48 (talk) 01:10, 8 August 2019 (UTC)
- Terima kasih sudah diapresiasi, bang
The Bugle: Issue CLXI, September 2019
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 09:17, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
The Signpost: 30 September 2019
- From the editors: Where do we go from here?
- Special report: Post-Framgate wrapup
- Traffic report: Varied and intriguing entries, less Luck, and some retreads
- News from the WMF: How the Wikimedia Foundation is making efforts to go green
- Recent research: Wikipedia's role in assessing credibility of news sources; using wikis against procrastination; OpenSym 2019 report
- On the bright side: What's making you happy this month?