User talk:Hacienda Guy

Hi

April 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm Katieh5584. I noticed that you recently removed some content from User talk:STATicVapor without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Katieh5584 (talk) 20:21, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to User talk:STATicVapor, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Katieh5584 (talk) 20:29, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. Acroterion (talk) 20:38, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Mike V • Talk 20:58, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hacienda Guy (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

What are you talking about? I'v made constructive edits here on Wikipedia, this is not fair, I'm new to this website, I deserve a second chance I can surely prove to you I'm capable of making a good encyclopedia. I request to be unblock

Decline reason:

Something like 95% of your edits were to other people's user talk pages. Yes, there were a few constructive edits. But ... while a broken clock is right twice a day, that doesn't mean you don't throw it away and get a new one if you think it's beyond repair. — Daniel Case (talk) 00:53, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Alright I admit it[edit]

I'm a Wikipedia:Sock puppet of User:MRivera25, YOU WIN!!!. I tried to help you guys make a good reliable website and you all betrayed me, you all should be proad of yourselfs.--Hacienda Guy (talk) 16:40, 24 April 2014 (UTC)MRivera25[reply]

Talkpage access revoked due to abuse of the unblock template. Acroterion (talk) 21:51, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]