User talk:Hamad olatunde

Welcome!

Hello, Hamad olatunde, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Ian.thomson (talk) 08:42, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

What Wikipedia is and how it works

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. Wikipedia is not a social media site. Wikipedia is not a job posting site. Wikipedia is not a place for "enticing customers." We can and do block users who are not here to build the encyclopedia. If you would like to work on the encyclopedia, keep in mind:

Don't be afraid to make changes, be bold in your edits. Just be prepared to discuss the changes you make, and possibly have them reverted.
"Truth" is not the only criteria for inclusion, verifiability is also required.
Always cite a source for any new information. When adding this information to articles, use <ref>reference tags like this</ref>, containing the name of the source, the author, page number, publisher or web address (if applicable).
We do not publish original thought nor original research. We're not a blog, we're not here to promote any ideology.
Reliable sources typically include: articles from magazines or newspapers (particularly scholarly journals), or books by recognized authors (basically, books by respected publishers). Online versions of these are usually accepted, provided they're held to the same standards. User generated sources (like Wikipedia) are to be avoided. Self-published sources should be avoided except for information by and about the subject that is not self-serving (for example, citing a company's website to establish something like year of establishment).
Articles are to be written from a neutral point of view. Wikipedia is not concerned with facts or opinions, it just summarizes reliable sources. Real scholarship actually does not say what understanding of the world is "true," but only with what there is evidence for.

Ian.thomson (talk) 08:42, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Help me!

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Please help me with...

Hamad olatunde (talk) 08:58, 7 February 2017 (UTC) Does it necessary to write proposal before getting project on Wiki-pedia?[reply]

Hi Hamad olatunde. Wikipedia can be edited by anyone, and if you have an account you can create articles without prior permission (see this essay for a simple how-to guide). However, please note that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a directory or a social media site - if you try to use Wikipedia for promotion, advertising, SEO or spam, your account will very quickly be blocked from editing the site. Yunshui ^雲 _水 09:52, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You had a response to this question and another one.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 20:01, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

This edit you made to the Help Desk had the effect to display a large amount of text which had previously been boxed by another editor to avoid cluttering the page. It might not have been intentional, but repeating such a behaviour will get you blocked for disruptive editing. Tigraan^{Click here to contact me} 12:27, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deepest apologies, I mixed you up with another contributor. Please disregard this message. Tigraan^{Click here to contact me} 16:58, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Help me!

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Please help me with...

Hamad olatunde (talk) 19:46, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Good evening,I don't know a day to start feeding my home with my own experience online.If someone can tell me a day to start managing myself with internet ideas,I will be happy.

I think you mistake the purpose of Wikipedia. It's an encyclopedia created by volunteers, a project we contribute our time and knowledge to for free, not something which pays us or allows us to make a living. If you're looking for a day to improve the encyclopedia, there's no better day than today. If, however, you expect your work on Wikipedia to feed you, you will very likely be disappointed and should spend your time working on a job, not editing Wikipedia. Huon (talk) 20:48, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Help me!

Please come to IRC.
By the looks of your question, I think it would be best to have you log on to IRC. IRC stands for "Internet Relay Chat", which allows for real-time text-based communication with other users. This way, in addition to the help I can provide, I can get others on Wikipedia's Live Help to help you, as well. You don't have to download anything to talk to us, just click here! See you there!

Please help me with...

Hamad olatunde (talk) 11:29, 10 March 2017 (UTC) Good day,I received a message that my work is no more needed online.If you can help me to do work,I will be happy.Thanks.[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia's support page

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Wikipedia's support page, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Theroadislong (talk) 11:48, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 12:18, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop

You have made a total of 16 edits to Wikipedia, of which 11 have been either you asking us to give you a job, or your asking our help in getting you a job elsewhere. This is not, and never will be, something with which we can help you; Wikipedia is a volunteer project in which unpaid volunteers collaborate to produce an encyclopedia. (We do have a very few paid employees, but they are all in highly technical roles for which specific skills are required.) If you want to write for us—unpaid—and are willing to follow our rules on how to write articles and which subjects are appropriate for inclusion, you're very welcome to participate, and the links at Wikipedia:Introduction may be of some use to you. However, if you continue to disrupt Wikipedia by asking inappropriate questions, you're likely to be blocked from Wikipedia, as you're wasting the time of numerous people who have to clean up after you. ‑ Iridescent 13:26, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia:Teahouse. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 19:06, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (March 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dodger67 was:

This submission seems to be a test edit and not an article worthy of an encyclopedia. Please use the sandbox for any editing tests, but do not submit for review until you have an article that you want reviewed for inclusion in Wikipedia. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Hamad olatunde/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 19:08, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Hamad olatunde, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 19:08, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No advertising and no pay.

You need to understand that Wikipedia does not allow advertising, and discourages paid editing. I suggest that you find somewhere else to earn money. You will not be popular with editors here if you keep trying to sell your services on this website. Dbfirs 19:18, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Account blocked

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (March 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was:

This submission seems to be a test edit and not an article worthy of an encyclopedia. Please use the sandbox for any editing tests, but do not submit for review until you have an article that you want reviewed for inclusion in Wikipedia. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Take any questions to the help desk at WP:HELPDESK

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Hamad olatunde/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

David.moreno72 12:30, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is WP:NOTHERE or WP:CIR issue. Linguist ^talk|contribs 00:13, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for the inability to understand what editing Wikipedia entails. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. NeilN ^{talk to me} 00:17, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Hamad. If you wish to be unblocked please tell us what specifically you want to edit and how you will go about accomplishing that task. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 00:20, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I NEED QUICK HELP

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to the submission and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hamad olatunde (talk) 18:38, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sir,I am looking for your help to unblock my page.Thanks.

You've already been given clear instructions above. If you want to be unblocked, explain what you intend to do on Wikipedia and how you intend to do it. From your contributions so far, you've given no indication that you understand what Wikipedia is and what Wikipedia isn't; specifically, that Wikipedia is not a social network, not a place to post begging letters, and not a place that will pay you for your contributions. As I've already told you, if you want to contribute constructively to Wikipedia you're very welcome, but up to now you've done nothing but waste other people's time. ‑ Iridescent 18:45, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

NeilN Yunshui Why do I get the suspicion this is yet another sock of User:Hammadsaeed? Boomer Vial^{Holla! We gonna ball!} 04:20, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Offhand I don't see any behavioral similarities. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 04:34, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

NeilN I think that at this point, Hammadsaeed would know better than to go back to creating and editing the articles that got him blocked multiple times. My intuition is telling me it is him, however, based off the name and obvious trollish behavior. Boomer Vial^{Holla! We gonna ball!} 04:46, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Whether he is or not, I'm not really inclined to let him waste much more of our time. Ian.thomson (talk) 04:55, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Since I got pinged: I haven't run a CU since I see no behavioural similarities - this user has different interests, different editing habits, different syntax... If this came up at an SPI, I would decline to run a CU, too. Maybe you're seeing something I'm not, BV, but nothing in this user's activities suggests to me that it's Hammadsaeed. Yunshui ^雲 _水 08:40, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yunshui Well, the name, as well as the overall non-competent behavior just gave me a suspicion. Hammadsaeed is also up to the same old, same old on the Simple English version of Wikipedia, so I figured he hasn't given up wasting our time yet. Boomer Vial^{Holla! We gonna ball!} 02:57, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Last chance

@Hamad olatunde: you need to tell us:

What do you think Wikipedia is?
How will you use Wikipedia?

If you keep asking for help, we will just take away your talk page access. Ian.thomson (talk) 04:55, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:Hamad olatunde/sandbox

Hello, Hamad olatunde. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Linguist^un Eins ^uno 10:27, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]