User talk:Hamilfan123456787

Welcome!

Hello, Hamilfan123456787, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Dead Mom, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at the our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions ask me on my talk page or you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! BOVINEBOY2008 15:26, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dead Mom

The article Dead Mom has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable song, per WP:NSONGS

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BOVINEBOY2008 15:26, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Here (Green Eggs and Ham)

Hello, Hamilfan123456787

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Govvy, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, Here (Green Eggs and Ham), for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to contest the deletion:

Edit the page
Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
Click the Publish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Govvy}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Govvy (talk) 14:02, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Here (Green Eggs and Ham) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Here (Green Eggs and Ham) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Here (Green Eggs and Ham) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Govvy (talk) 19:29, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of What time is it? Somebody please answer

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as What time is it? Somebody please answer, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. JTtheOG (talk) 01:48, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mark Wahlberg

Regarding your recent attempt to change the title of a section, please read the outcome of a talk page discussion on the subject at Special:Diff/962892418#"Hate Crimes" subsection title. Favonian (talk) 17:15, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2022

Hi Hamilfan123456787! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Mark Wahlberg that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. TylerBurden (talk) 02:06, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

April 2022

Hello. Some of your recent genre changes, such as the one you made to Inside Out (2015 film), have conflicted with our neutral point of view and/or verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you seek consensus for certain edits by discussing the matter on the article's talk page. Thank you. Chompy Ace 22:50, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Pinball: The Man Who Saved the Game

Hello, Hamilfan123456787,

Thank you for creating Pinball: The Man Who Saved the Game.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

This subject seems notable. Would you mind adding some sources I've found to further improve the article? The New Yorker, Deadline, New York Times, NPR interview, Washington Post, Christian Science Monitor and Variety. Thanks,

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Schminnte}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Schminnte (talk • contribs) 00:17, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]