User talk:Happy Photographer

License tagging for Image:AustralianWoodDuckFemale.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:AustralianWoodDuckFemale.JPG. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:05, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

Removing Photos

Hello. I have placed the following on the discussion page for Australian Magpie:

It seems that some photographers are determined to have "pride of place" for their own photos - even going so far as to remove the photo(s) that held that place before. I have just restored the photo in the lead paragraph which was removed by Happy Photographer, who replaced it with one of his/her own. I've moved Happy Photographer's photo futher down in the article, next to where it better illustrated the text.

While it may make sense to re-order photos to best illustrate different sections of the article, I find it very dismissive of the contributions of photographers to simply eliminate their work entirely. Especially as this swapping/eliminating of images always seems to happen in the "top spots" of the article. This may not have been the intention of Happy Photographer, but I would ask him/her, and others, to be more respectful of the existing images when choosing to add ones own to an article.

It appears from your user page that you are new to Wikipedia, and I assume you are still working out how to contribute. My advice, never replace images, or even substantially remove portions of text without justifying your actions on the discussion page and/or citing your resources. Failing to make a good case for removing someone else's work can and lead to misunderstandings and hurt feelings. Everyone here is donating their work. Please give such generosity the respect it deserves, and hopefully your work will be respected in kind. Cheers KeresH 10:45, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:Chestnut Teal.JPG or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:29, 26 April 2014 (UTC)