Jump to content

User talk:Happyrancho

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

.

Your submission at Articles for creation: PHYSICS WALLAH (August 27)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Liance was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
-Liancetalk/contribs 23:18, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Happyrancho! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! -Liancetalk/contribs 23:18, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:PHYSICS WALLAH, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 07:29, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

All information given are factual and can be cross checked. I don't think it's a promotional material.I am writing this after observing the plateform for a year. Happyrancho (talk) 08:52, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021

[edit]

Information icon Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Draft:PHYSICS WALLAH. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 07:29, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It is not promotional material. You could cross check the information. Happyrancho (talk) 08:49, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

[edit]
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Dr Sachin Kapur Fanclub per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dr Sachin Kapur Fanclub. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  -- RoySmith (talk) 17:17, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

To appeal unblocking

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Happyrancho (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Hello sir @RoySmith I was blocked on Wikipedia for involvement in sockpuppetry in association with some @Dr Sachin Kapur Fanclub but I am certainly sure that my IP address and I have nothing to do with this user. Maybe my earlier work was not as per Wikipedia guidelines, and that was just because, at that time, I didn't know this guideline at all. So, I humbly request you kindly review my block to edit anything and, irrespective of my past actions, give me a chance again to contribute as an editor. I will assure you that I will keep my work clean and as per Wikipedia requirements. Thanks for considering my appeal for unblocking. Happyrancho (talk)

Accept reason:

I think another chance is warranted here, and with the CU issue resolved I will remove the block. 331dot (talk) 07:28, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I blocked this account 3 years ago. There's no records or data beyond what's publicly available in the block logs. About all I can say is I just ran some checks and don't see any evidence of socking right now, so any admin is free to unblock if they feel it's justified and can consider the requirement to consult with a CU to have been discharged. RoySmith (talk) 01:41, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]