User talk:HarishMelwani

HarishMelwani (talk) 07:09, 9 March 2018 (UTC){[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

HarishMelwani (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello Sir/Madam, I am Harish Melwani From India And I'm Therefore Here To Request You To Unblock Me & My Site Link From Wiki. I confirm that I always follow wikipedia rules and I consider wikipedia as a part of my life, so please understand my pain as I am blocked. I Have Caused A Wrong In Your Wiki By Spamming My Links, & I Accept It But Please I Was A New User For Wiki And I Really Don't Know About The Spamming TNC's, Another User Just Suggested Me this Technique & I Followed It Through The Teamviewer Under Some Circumstances I Really Know That I Was Doing Wrong, Then I Just Posted My Weblink To Many Wiki Pages Which Are Just Related To My Website Category Please...Please & Please I Request you To Unblock Me & Remove My URL From The Spam List And I Herby Promise That I'll Never Repeat It Again And Also I'll Contribute With My Good Efforts To Wiki. Sorry For the inconvenience Caused Thank you HarishMelwani (talk) 06:40, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

1)duplicate request. 2) Oshwah's concerns not addressed 3) If you aren't going to readd those spam links, there'd be no need to request removal from spam list. (don't know if site is on it) 4) what sorts of edits will you make? --Dlohcierekim (talk) 10:07, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

HarishMelwani (talk) 06:40, 9 March 2018 (UTC)§HarishMelwani (talk) 06:40, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your unblock message isn't very convincing - especially when I see that your only edits were attempts to gain traffic on your website... what places or articles do you plan on improving on Wikipedia? What do you plan to do? How will you contribute as an editor to the project and what will you do? ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 06:55, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Also, what spam list are you referring to? How do you know that your website is on the list? Why are you requesting that your website be removed from such a list? ... ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 06:56, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

HarishMelwani (talk) 07:09, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

HarishMelwani (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Sir, I've Got a Notification That I'm Blocked As I've Spammed My Links That To For A Related Category Wiki Pages, The Thing I've Done Wrong Is I've Repeated The Same Links For 6 Times. Sorry For What I've Did, Because I'm A New User Of Wikipedia I Should Get A Least Chance this Time So, That I've Learnt Something Which Should Never Be Repeated Again. I'm A Writer And i can Contribute Well To The Film [ tollywood ] Category & Please Take A Deep Look And Give A Last Try. Sorry Again. Thank You

Decline reason:

Wow. Sorry, I'm declining this out of hand. You are welcome to request an unblock again without capitalising the first letter of every word. I'll also note that the problem isn't just that you repeated the same link 6 times, it's that you tried to add that link at all. It's not clear you understand that. Yamla (talk) 12:08, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Re: capitalizing 1st letter of each word[edit]

Please don't. It is most jarring. It makes sentences almost unreadable. In English, one capitalizes the first letter of the first word of a sentence and proper nouns only. Thanks, --Dlohcierekim (talk) 10:12, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks & sorry for that, I'm mostly habituated typing with the capital letter first for every word.

HarishMelwani (talk) 14:22, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

HarishMelwani (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello sir, I'm Harish Melwani from India, I am therefore here to request you [ The Admins Of Wiki ] to unblock me from the wiki world, I accept that I've done wrong with you ( Just added a citation to the every page related to Prabhas & To let people get a good quality of information about him through my site ) this was the only sole reason for what all happend & finally sorry for what all I've done.Everything was done under the suggestion of my friend who was just to help my site rank in google.Now I've understand all the policies of wiki & never thought that the support is too serious and more strict. I hereby promise you that i'll never and ever repeat it again violating the TnC's of wiki and also i'll contribute my best to wiki without being selfish will contribute best to the viewers of wiki. I wish you to take a keen observation onto this review and help me with a try. Thankyou HarishMelwani (talk) 14:24, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. TonyBallioni (talk) 21:58, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.