User talk:Harry-Oscar 1812

Welcome[edit]

Hello Harry-Oscar 1812 and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your contributions, such as the ones to Falange Española de las JONS, do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles.

If you still have questions, there is a new contributors' help page, or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia.

I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Auric talk 00:55, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

June 2017[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Conservative Party (UK). Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 16:04, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

July 2017[edit]

Hello, I'm MrX. I noticed that you made a change to an article, King Shit & the Golden Boys, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. - Mr X 18:42, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of King Shit & the Golden Boys for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article King Shit & the Golden Boys is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/King Shit & the Golden Boys until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TheLongTone (talk) 14:51, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Tommy Wiseau-Pink Tie.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Tommy Wiseau-Pink Tie.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. DMacks (talk) 20:50, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Tommy Wiseau-book signing.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Tommy Wiseau-book signing.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. DMacks (talk) 20:50, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Greg Sestero and Tommy Wiseau.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Greg Sestero and Tommy Wiseau.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. DMacks (talk) 20:52, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license[edit]

Unspecified source/license for File:Phelekezela Mphoko meets Jacob Zuma (Cropped).jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Phelekezela Mphoko meets Jacob Zuma (Cropped).jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 21:46, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Phelekezela Mphoko meets Jacob Zuma (Cropped).jpg[edit]

A tag has been placed on File:Phelekezela Mphoko meets Jacob Zuma (Cropped).jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a file licensed as "for non-commercial use only", "no derivative use", "for Wikipedia use only", or "used with permission"; and it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then:

state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
add the relevant copyright tag and if necessary, a complete fair use rationale.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Majora (talk) 19:37, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

incompetence[edit]

Hi. I reverted your edits at Gavin McInnes and placed the {{cn}} tag that you don't know how to use. In the future, discuss your concerns on the talk page when you don't know how to code properly. Chris Troutman (talk) 15:47, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:King Shit & The Golden Boys.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:King Shit & The Golden Boys.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:50, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

We Happy Few[edit]

Be aware that copying and pasting text from an external wiki is both not reliable and is a copyright violation, which we cannot do. We also can't use images freely - we require non-free content to be carefully selected and used. While the plot section is presently non-existant, part of that is due to the fact the game is not yet in full release, and we know they will add two more playable characters, which will affect that. Further, keep in mind plot sections are expected to be concise so even when we do add one, it shouldn't run down all details, just key ones. --MASEM (t) 22:07, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Again, you are inserting text from a wiki, and despite making a few changes, is essentially a copyright violation. This can lead to you being blocked. --MASEM (t) 22:13, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Right...the text is edited so please stop removing it.

File:Arthur Hastings (Obituary).png listed for discussion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Arthur Hastings (Obituary).png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. MASEM (t) 14:27, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

December 2017[edit]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at For Britain, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Serial Number54129^{...speculates} 22:45, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at For Britain shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. 331dot (talk) 23:03, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on For Britain. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Chris Troutman (talk) 23:15, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Harry-Oscar_1812 reported by User:Chris troutman (Result: ). Thank you. Chris Troutman (talk) 23:16, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Harry-Oscar_1812 reported by User:331dot (Result: ). Thank you. 331dot (talk) 13:57, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Final Warning: Edit Warring on For Britain[edit]

You are exactly one disruptive edit away from being blocked. Knock it off. -Ad Orientem (talk) 14:22, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Teenage Guitar[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Teenage Guitar requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Metaloaf (talk) 17:29, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

December 2017[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Teenage Guitar, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk • contribs) 18:06, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Teenage Guitar. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk • contribs) 18:12, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license[edit]

Unspecified source/license for File:Marcel De Graaff.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Marcel De Graaff.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 17:46, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Marcel De Graaff.jpg[edit]

A tag has been placed on File:Marcel De Graaff.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a file licensed as "for non-commercial use only", "no derivative use", "for Wikipedia use only", or "used with permission"; and it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then:

state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
add the relevant copyright tag and if necessary, a complete fair use rationale.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Majora (talk) 20:51, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 2[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Progressive Party (United States, 1912), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Center (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:47, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018[edit]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Progressive Party (United States, 1912). This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This has been a recurring trend for you. Your edit history and user page suggest you may not be able to maintain a WP:NPOV when you unilaterally change ideologies and positions of political parties without citing a source. You've also engaged in at least three edit wars to keep those unsourced edits live. Examples: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16]. GS ⋙ ☎ 04:17, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Party for Freedom[edit]

I would like to invite you to comment at Talk:Party for Freedom#Radical right or far-right. – Editør (talk) 00:05, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:The Universe & Me (Album Cover).jpeg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:The Universe & Me (Album Cover).jpeg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 17:49, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Harry-Oscar 1812. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Andy Warski[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Andy Warski requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. — Sagotreespirit (^talk) 21:44, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Andy Warski moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Andy Warski, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. – bradv🍁 22:06, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Zillatron - Lord Of The Harvest (reissue).jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Zillatron - Lord Of The Harvest (reissue).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 04:31, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license[edit]

Unspecified source/license for File:Jared Louche performing with Chemlab - 2010.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Jared Louche performing with Chemlab - 2010.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 18:46, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 22[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Wax Trax! Records, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Industrial (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:40, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 10[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Earthquake Glue (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Tim Tobias

Universal Truths and Cycles (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Tim Tobias

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 16:16, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 17[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Earthquake Glue, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tim Tobias (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 16:57, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 25[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tactical Neural Implant, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Silence of the Lambs (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:39, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

March 2020[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at InfoWars, you may be blocked from editing.

Additionally, please also review WP:NOTFORUM. Talk pages are for discussing specific improvements to articles, not for general kvetching. Grayfell (talk) 23:14, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Warning[edit]

If you make statements about other editors again like you did at Talk:Far-right politics, you can expect sanctions. Stop making assumptions about the motivations of other editors. Acroterion (talk) 23:35, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

March 2020[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Acroterion (talk) 23:42, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 18[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Industrial music, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Industrial (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 15:14, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Important Notice[edit]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 08:42, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you change genres in pages without discussion or sources, as you did at Atlas, Rise!. Rob van vee 12:00, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, don't get your panties in a twist!Harry-Oscar 1812 (talk) 14:10, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ANI-notice[edit]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread can be found here. Rob van vee 09:34, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. User:Ymblanter (talk) 19:19, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you change genres in pages without discussion or sources, as you did at Velcro Fly. It would appear your last block was ineffective. Next unsourced edit will take us back to WP:ANI and I'm sure the next block is going to be a longer one! Rob van vee 15:44, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ANI-notice[edit]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread can be found here. Rob van vee 18:52, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for Disruptive editing (repeated unsourced genre changes) - two previous blocks for the same thing have not modified behavior.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Floquenbeam (talk) 19:01, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Two previous blocks have not changed this behavior, so you're going to need to agree to stop this before an admin unblocks you. --Floquenbeam (talk) 19:02, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Andy Warski[edit]

Hello, Harry-Oscar 1812. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Andy Warski".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 02:42, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]