User talk:Hasbino
Welcome
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.
If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.
Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...
Finding your way around:
|
Need help?
|
|
How you can help:
|
|
Additional tips...
|
A barnstar for you!
[edit]![]() |
The Original Barnstar | |
You are awarded The Original Barnstar for excellent contributions and new articles since 2013. JQTriple7 talk 08:32, 3 December 2015 (UTC) |
Interested in Twinkle?
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/6/62/Howtwinkle.png/220px-Howtwinkle.png)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/1/15/Twinkle-reviewing.png/220px-Twinkle-reviewing.png)
I have seen your editing history, and I had noticed your use of the undo function multiple times when trying to revert one user's edits. Well there is this tool called Twinkle which you can use to revert a user's edits in one click. If you are interested in getting it, you may go to Preferences --> Gadgets --> then tick the Twinkle box. If you are interested for more information about Twinkle, you may click this link here. Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 10:01, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
Inside Out
[edit]Hi, are you still around? I was thinking of reviewing the article. FunkMonk (talk) 16:29, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for offering but it seems like someone else has begun reviewing the article. But you can still contribute and discuss in the review as soon as he provides feedback. Hasbino (talk) 09:17, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Inside Out (2015 film)
[edit]Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Inside Out (2015 film) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Llywrch -- Llywrch (talk) 19:01, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
Thank you for accepting to review the article. I'll do my best to respond to your feedbacks as soon as I can. --Hasbino (talk) 09:22, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
I've finally gotten to writing up my review on this article. (Sorry again for the delay.) It looks very promising, & while I would like to promote it to GA I did have some concerns -- some more important than others -- & if that edit war on the article continues, let me know & I'll use my Admin privileges to put a stop to it. -- llywrch (talk) 05:50, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Inside Out (2015 film)
[edit]The article Inside Out (2015 film) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Inside Out (2015 film) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Llywrch -- Llywrch (talk) 06:01, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
- Okay, after too much time (on my part) in this process, I've gone ahead & promoted this article to GA. I would have done this weeks ago since at the time I felt it met all of the criteria, but since there was interest from others -- & the plot summary was being revised on a constant basis -- I held off. (Well, actually I've been busy in real life, too.) So congratulations! -- llywrch (talk) 20:19, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
- Thank you so much, Llywrch! I appreciate all the work you have done reviewing the article. Hasbino (talk) 14:47, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Inside Out (2015 film)
[edit]The article Inside Out (2015 film) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Inside Out (2015 film) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Llywrch -- Llywrch (talk) 20:22, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]Hello, Hasbino. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Hasbino. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Hasbino. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Notice
[edit] Hi, Hasbino. I'm just posting to let you know that List of accolades received by Inside Out (2015 film) – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been submitted as a candidate to be featured on the Main Page as Today's featured list. The proposed content can be seen here. You are more than welcome to post your thoughts on the nomination. Regards, Chompy Ace 15:04, 14 January 2023 (UTC)