User talk:Hattock79

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Tom Hatton no redirect[edit]

.

Hello there, I am looking to keep people informed about the development of Tom Hatton (actor and New Media producer) and it is important for the page not to be redirected. When searching for 'Tom Hatton', the search is redirected to 'Thomas Hatton'. How can I ensure that when Tom Hatton is typed into Wikipedia, or google, 'Tom Hatton' is not redirected? Regards Will Hattock79 (talk) 16:21, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits[edit]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 17:12, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for the reason that this account has been compromised, and by your own admission has been used by at least one other person. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Orange Mike | Talk 18:19, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hattock79 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Hello there. I received an email informing me my account has been blocked and I would like to pursue unblocking it. I recently gave someone the ability to access some of my information (not just Wikipedia) to help inform people about Tom Hatton. Although well intentioned, the I realize that I should not have done this with Wikipedia as an objective online resource. By doing this, I understand my account has been compromised and will more closely protect it in the future. In addition, by drawing my attention to the page 'Tom Hatton', I have been informed of several issues with the page, including neutrality and notoriety. Regarding neutrality, I am now fully aware that a page with just one contributor may conflict with this. This has informed me of the purpose and value of Wikipedia as an objective online resource, having previously viewed it more towards social media. Moving forward, I am keen to contribute to Wikipedia in the most valuable way. I look forward to hearing your response and potentially contributing again. Regards Hattock Hattock79 (talk) 18:08, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

As you admit to sharing this account, thereby compromising it, it cannot be unblocked per WP:COMPROMISED. Kinu t/c 20:07, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.