User talk:Hazardous Matt

RETIRED

This user is no longer active on Wikipedia.

Previously...on the last episode of
Hazardous Matt's talkpage

Archives

Inconsequential

Please do not contact me about matters stemming from the Pro-Wrestling project (WP:PW). I've removed all articles related to that project from my watchlist. That is all. Hazardous Matt (talk)

RE

Nice, thanks even though I haven't expanded a TNA article in 5 months. I'm trying to get back into expanding stuff though soon. So they'll be useful by then. If you could, get some of the set, crew, etc. The more I think about it, I'd like to make the article to be more about the event, rather than just the matches; Production, etc. I've tried that with a few before, I feel I could come up with a very interesting formula.--WillC 06:41, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Do what you can and what you feel like. Just have a good time, anything is nice.--WillC 23:36, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, the last show I went to was a Raw house show 3 years back. PPVs probably feel alot different.--WillC 21:34, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks but don't go out of your way man. Have a good time, don't worry about the pictures. If I were to go to this event, I would probably take a picture of almost everything. The ring, the set, the arena, the cameras, the cameramen, the commentators, the wrestlers, the referees, the crowd, etc. That way I would be prepared for anything and everything. Whatever you take I will use, thanks again. But don't go out of your way to do stuff. Sit back and watch the show. You don't owe me anything.--WillC 07:00, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I didn't get it. My email is wmhc818@yahoo.com If you have your's included on this site, I'll email you so it is easier.--WillC 06:09, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nope, not there. My user page has all my information in order to get in contact with me in one way or another.--WillC 22:23, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Got it, your name fits the role of an action character.--WillC 03:09, 25 October 2010 (UTC) Okay, Thanks! Hopefully soon I'll find the time to start expanding again.--WillC 21:00, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Totally forgot about them, have yet to do a BFG article. Pass on the link, I'll get them as I'm working on 2005 and 2008 PPVs right now and I'll be near BFG very soon.--WillC 01:41, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thanks man, much appreciated. I'll get on uploading them soon. Considering the articles I'm about to make, it shouldn't be long now.--WillC 20:04, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"Jimmy_McDaniels"

Your third diff[1] is a repeat of your second diff. The intended third diff would certainly help the case - can you fix it? Cheers :> Doc9871 (talk) 13:36, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Hazardous Matt. You have new messages at 3bulletproof16's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Feedback ^☎ 05:56, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Userrights

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged revisions, underwent a two-month trial which ended on 15 August 2010. Its continued use is still being discussed by the community, you are free to participate in such discussions. Many articles still have pending changes protection applied, however, and the ability to review pending changes continues to be of use.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under level 1 pending changes and edits made by non-reviewers to level 2 pending changes protected articles (usually high traffic articles). Pending changes was applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

For the guideline on reviewing, see Wikipedia:Reviewing. Being granted reviewer rights doesn't grant you status nor change how you can edit articles even with pending changes. The general help page on pending changes can be found here, and the general policy for the trial can be found here.

If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

In addition, I've also granted your account rollback rights because I noticed you have reverted vandalism effectively (remember that this tool is for reverting vandalism or blatant spam, and not any other types of edit). If you'd rather not have this userright, I will remove it if you like. Best. Acalamari 22:11, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for the heads up, I think I'm done speaking in the AfD as well after his last comment, you know if he's not going to be Neutral about it why continue. Afro (Talk) 23:10, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure how much it means in the short run but its interesting to know what he gets up to regarding a possible deleted page. Afro (Talk) 23:20, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

RE

My indication of assistance is in no way a bye for him to duck the questions of why he removed the GAR notification twice, these questions still need to be answered. Afro (Talk) 03:20, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

Oh did I forget to put a reason, sorry. Well anyway it was because I read it and I felt it was more of a forum topic thing not encyclopedic if that makes sense to you.--Voices in my Head WrestleMania XXVII 12:41, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

As a matter of fact I did read it, I thought it was more forum than encylopedic talk or what ever wikipedia calls it and I removed it because I thought it was forum. It was a mistake, it happens. But everyone makes them even you make mistakes and if you even say no then your full of it.--Voices in my Head WrestleMania XXVII 20:30, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

McMahon

I intend avoiding Screwball as much as humanly possible (as I have for a long time). If you find "magnate" to be unsupportted as the common term, please make that edit. If you find it supported as the common term, please keep it. Cheers. Collect (talk) 10:56, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

lol

you pressed rollback by accident haha. Don't do it again. N Puffin ^{Let's talk!} 16:24, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Pictures

Those freaking BFG pictures slipped my mind until now. I'm gonna start trying to load each one onto commons. I'm probably gonna need you at some point to provide that they are your's and you are releasing the rights. I haven't loaded a free use image in so long I'm bound to screw this all up.--WillC 08:37, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've uploaded the first pic onto commons here. I'm gonna see if I've done everything correctly first and the licensing is sound before doing the rest. I'm gonna make sure to save the other photos for later though.--WillC 09:04, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Meh, I'll probably change it up. Remove the link and all, just place you as a the source.--WillC 19:22, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I had copies of every single one of them. Then my harddive died and lost them all haha My luck--WillC 07:09, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Shall do--WillC 21:08, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, I got them. I'm in college now. Hopefully I can find some time to load them and place them in the proper articles.--WillC 23:19, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Missing Wikipedians

Was just passing through, saw you had a wicked cool username, checked out your page to see what was on it (I'm a curious person :P). Sorry to see you're not here. I put your name on the page above and if you ever change your mind and come back, please take your name off it. God bless, Lazy Bastard Guy 03:51, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:40, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]