User talk:HazelAB
| |
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:17, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Newspaper account[edit]
Hello,
I requested the newspaper account access for my research, but find I do not actually use it. I would like to return the subscription so some other editor can use it.Georgejdorner (talk) 00:39, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
- HI @Georgejdorner: Thanks for offering to return your account. We've been given more free accounts and there's not a waitlist, so it's not necessary to remove your access immediately. Your subscription will expire anyway on March 19 2016. All the best, HazelAB (talk) 13:50, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
Newspapers.com[edit]
Hello HazelAB. I applied for the Newspapers.com subscription on Saturday and was accepted sometime on Sunday. I then created an account and filled out the Google form, but I still do not have free access to all the newspapers. Thanks,--12george1 (talk) 19:35, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
- Hi @12george1: The Newspapers.com subscription is a two-stage process. Now that you've signed up and filled out the form I will let Newspapers.com know and they will activate your account. That should happen in the next couple of days. All the best, HazelAB (talk) 13:48, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
Question about quote from newspapers.com[edit]
Hello. I have added a fairly long (3 lines) quote from an article I found on newspapers.com for J. Washington Moore. Should I trim it a bit more? I feel like all of it is significant though, and those who don't have access to newspapers.com will want to read what the article said, given that it is a contentious issue. Usually I don't add quote at all, but in this case I feel like it is necessary. What do you think? (Please ping me when you respond as I may not see your page on my watchlist.) Thank you.Zigzig20s (talk) 19:26, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
- Hi @Zigzig20s:, Wow, it's great to see how much Newspapers.com has to offer about J. Washington Moore! I don't see a problem with the length of the quotation, but I think it would be even better if you clipped the article, using the resource's Clipping function, and made a link to it. That way people who don't have subscriptions could see the whole newspaper article. The clipping would look like this: https://www.newspapers.com/clip/3987552/ Information about how to use the clipping functionality is at the Wikipedia Library Newspapers.com site here: Wikipedia: Newspapers.com#Citation and Open Access and at the Newspapers.com site here. All the best, HazelAB (talk) 23:10, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
- Will my newspapers.com username show on the clipping? It looks like it might. If so, I'd rather someone else added the clippings.Zigzig20s (talk) 00:11, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
- I believe the three articles with quotes could be clipped, if you want to do it. But otherwise the direct quote might be sufficient. I usually never use direct quotes, but the three topics are potentially contentious (female suffrage, stolen election ballots of black candidates, arrest of drug dealer).Zigzig20s (talk) 00:14, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
- Will my newspapers.com username show on the clipping? It looks like it might. If so, I'd rather someone else added the clippings.Zigzig20s (talk) 00:11, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
A note of thanks …[edit]
… for your very efficient handling of the newspapers.com subscriptions and renewals. Many, many thanks! Regards, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 10:41, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
Books & Bytes - Issue 15[edit]
The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 15, December-January 2016
by The Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs), Sadads (talk · contribs), Nikkimaria (talk · contribs), UY Scuti (talk · contribs)
- New donations - Ships, medical resources, plus Arabic and Farsi resources
- #1lib1ref campaign summary and highlights
- New branches and coordinators
The Interior via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:20, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
Hello, HazelAB,
I have reviewed the above and it is good to go. It was also an enjoyable read. Thank you.
Georgejdorner (talk) 23:36, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
DYK for Margaret Benyon[edit]
 | On 27 February 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Margaret Benyon, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Margaret Benyon has been called "the mother of British holography"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Margaret Benyon. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
— Coffee // have a cup // beans // 12:02, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
DYK for Iarla Ó Lionáird[edit]
| On 28 February 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Iarla Ó Lionáird, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Iarla Ó Lionáird sang "Casadh an tSúgáin" in Brooklyn? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Iarla Ó Lionáird. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
— Coffee // have a cup // beans // 00:01, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Newspapers.com renewal list[edit]
Where is the renewal list, your message says "here" but there is no link. Thanks, Amqui (talk) 16:52, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Newspapers.com sign-up[edit]
Hi HazelAB, thank you very much for the approval. A few days before I applied to you, another editor suggested that I sign up for a free membership at Newspapers.com, so I did. However, I was unable to access anything without paying more money – and that's when the other editor informed me that I should have signed up on your list. I mention all this because after receiving your approval email, I clicked on the special partnership registration link that helps you track who subscribes via your partnership, and it said that I was already a free member. I hope this doesn't mess up your records. I went ahead and did step 2, filling out the Google form. Best, Yoninah (talk) 13:52, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
DYK for The Red and the Green[edit]
| On 13 March 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article The Red and the Green, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that The Red and the Green is the only historical novel by Iris Murdoch? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Red and the Green. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
— Coffee // have a cup // beans // 00:01, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Erica Deichmann Gregg[edit]
Hello! Your submission of Erica Deichmann Gregg at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 21:02, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
DYK for Erica Deichmann Gregg[edit]
| On 19 March 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Erica Deichmann Gregg, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Erica Deichmann created over 5,000 glazes for Deichmann pottery? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Erica Deichmann Gregg. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
— Coffee // have a cup // beans // 12:02, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Precious anniversary[edit]
 | |
| library | |
|---|---|
| ...you were recipient no. 1166 of Precious, a prize of QAI! |
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:17, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Three years now! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:59, 29 March 2018 (UTC)
... and four --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:01, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
... and five --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:28, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
Newspapers.com renewals—Never got an account in the first place![edit]
I got an email from you on newpapers.com account renewals, but I was not aware that I actually had a newspapers.com account via Wikipedia. I applied for one, but never received any login information or password or instruction on how to get such. I had assumed something had gone wrong, or that you were over the limit on accounts. Having that account would have made several articles I was working on much easier. If possible, can you check and see if I really do have a newspapers.com account, and let me know what my user login and password are, or how to get them? Thank you. Carl Henderson (talk) 19:31, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
Newspapers.com[edit]
Hi HazelAB,
I completed the required forms for full access to Newspapers.com back in March and still haven't received full access. Can you please help? Many thanks! X4n6 (talk) 23:49, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
- @X4n6: You should have full access as of March 30. It may be relevant that since January Newspapers.com has added "Publisher Extra" content that is not included in our Wikipedia subscriptions. It appears in search result lists with a little plus sign next to the newspaper title. Then when you click on the result you get a message inviting you to upgrade your subscription in order to view the Publisher Extra content. Or can you not get access to anything at all on the site? HazelAB (talk) 16:15, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- Many thanks for getting back to me. That's exactly it: virtually everything that came up in my searches had the plus(+) sign on them, re-directing me to the "Upgrade to a Publisher Extra Subscription to view this page" notice. So short of doing that, I suppose Newspapers.com has severely limited their utility re: us then? Oh well, still grateful for the resource - and your help. Many thanks again! X4n6 (talk) 22:44, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Suzie LeBlanc[edit]
Hello! Your submission of Suzie LeBlanc at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 19:54, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Double hooks[edit]
No, the hook fact doesn't have to appear in both articles. Yoninah (talk) 09:21, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
I have applied for access to Newspapers.com. Thank you. — Ssven2 Speak 2 me 13:42, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
DYK for Alexander Ewing (composer)[edit]
On 3 June 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Alexander Ewing (composer), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Alexander Ewing's tune for "Jerusalem the Golden" was "the earliest written, the best known, and with children the most popular"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Alexander Ewing (composer). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Alexander Ewing (composer)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:08, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
DYK for Jerusalem the Golden (hymn)[edit]
On 3 June 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Jerusalem the Golden (hymn), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Alexander Ewing's tune for "Jerusalem the Golden" was "the earliest written, the best known, and with children the most popular"? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Jerusalem the Golden (hymn)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:08, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
Newspaperarchive.com Account[edit]
I filled out the Google Doc for my newspaperarchive.com account on the first. I just didn't know when that would be available for me. I don't want to be pushy but I could use it for the article I am currently working on.--Ncchild (talk) 17:07, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
- Hi @Ncchild: I've passed the information on to NewspaperArchive but haven't heard back from them yet. I'll let you know as soon as I do. I'll be sending you the password you'll use to access the resource. All the best, HazelAB (talk) 14:08, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
Newspapers.com[edit]
Hi, I haven't been given free access yet at newspapers.com only the basic version which excludes most pages, please advise Atlantic306 (talk) 18:34, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
- @Atlantic306: Your account was activated on July 15. It may be relevant that since January 2016 Newspapers.com has added "Publisher Extra" content that is not included in our Wikipedia subscriptions. It appears in search result lists with a little plus sign next to the newspaper title. Then when you click on the result you get a message inviting you to upgrade your subscription in order to view the Publisher Extra content. Does that sound familiar? HazelAB (talk) 18:54, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
- Yes, that is it, at present all the results i've looked for are excluded, hopefullly will find some free ones. ThanksAtlantic306 (talk) 19:00, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
DYK for Peter Cunningham (photographer)[edit]
On 31 August 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Peter Cunningham (photographer), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Peter Cunningham's earliest professional assignment was to shoot Bruce Springsteen's first publicity photos for Columbia Records? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Peter Cunningham (photographer). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Peter Cunningham (photographer)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Gatoclass (talk) 00:01, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
Académie de la Grande Chaumière[edit]
Thank you for your attempts to improve Académie de la Grande Chaumière, I prefer your format. However there is what I think is a more significant dispute with your protagonist in Talk:Académie de la Grande Chaumière. I will refrain from intervening in your support until that dispute is resolved. Verbcatcher (talk) 15:27, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
Autopatrolled granted[edit]
Hi HazelAB, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the patroller right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! Beeblebrox (talk) 22:36, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
DYK for Sartre: Romantic Rationalist[edit]
On 29 December 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Sartre: Romantic Rationalist, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Iris Murdoch's first book, Sartre: Romantic Rationalist, was the first book about Jean-Paul Sartre's work to be published in English? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Sartre: Romantic Rationalist. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Sartre: Romantic Rationalist), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Maile (talk) 00:01, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
Gannet Rock Lighthouse[edit]
You are right, I removed the template. Chesipiero (talk) 18:43, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
March 2019 at Women in Red[edit]
   Please join us for these virtual events:
| ||
|
|
Books & Bytes, Issue 32[edit]
The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 32, January – February 2019
- #1Lib1Ref
- New and expanded partners
- Wikimedia and Libraries User Group update
- Global branches update
- Bytes in brief
French version of Books & Bytes is now available on meta!
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:29, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
Facto Post – Issue 21 – 28 February 2019[edit]
Facto Post – Issue 21 – 28 February 2019
 The Editor is Charles Matthews, for ContentMine. Please leave feedback for him, on his User talk page.
To subscribe to Facto Post go to Wikipedia:Facto Post mailing list. For the ways to unsubscribe, see the footer.
Systematic reviews are basic building blocks of evidence-based medicine, surveys of existing literature devoted typically to a definite question that aim to bring out scientific conclusions. They are principled in a way Wikipedians can appreciate, taking a critical view of their sources.  Ben Goldacre in 2014 wrote (link below) "[...] : the "information architecture" of evidence based medicine (if you can tolerate such a phrase) is a chaotic, ad hoc, poorly connected ecosystem of legacy projects. In some respects the whole show is still run on paper, like it's the 19th century." Is there a Wikidatan in the house? Wouldn't some machine-readable content that is structured data help? Most likely it would, but the arcana of systematic reviews and how they add value would still need formal handling. The PRISMA standard dates from 2009, with an update started in 2018. The concerns there include the corpus of papers used: how selected and filtered? Now that Wikidata has a 20.9 million item bibliography, one can at least pose questions. Each systematic review is a tagging opportunity for a bibliography. Could that tagging be reproduced by a query, in principle? Can it even be second-guessed by a query (i.e. simulated by a protocol which translates into SPARQL)? Homing in on the arcana, do the inclusion and filtering criteria translate into metadata? At some level they must, but are these metadata explicitly expressed in the articles themselves? The answer to that is surely "no" at this point, but can TDM find them? Again "no", right now. Automatic identification doesn't just happen. Actually these questions lack originality. It should be noted though that WP:MEDRS, the reliable sources guideline used here for health information, hinges on the assumption that the usefully systematic reviews of biomedical literature can be recognised. Its nutshell summary, normally the part of a guideline with the highest density of common sense, allows literature reviews in general validity, but WP:MEDASSESS qualifies that indication heavily. Process wonkery about systematic reviews definitely has merit.
If you wish to receive no further issues of Facto Post, please remove your name from our mailing list. Alternatively, to opt out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page.
Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery |
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:02, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
April editathons at Women in Red[edit]
April 2019[edit]
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:00, 25 March 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
(Please excuse this post if it is a duplicate!)
Facto Post – Issue 22 – 28 March 2019[edit]
| Facto Post – Issue 22 – 28 March 2019
The Editor is Charles Matthews, for ContentMine. Please leave feedback for him, on his User talk page.
To subscribe to Facto Post go to Wikipedia:Facto Post mailing list. For the ways to unsubscribe, see the footer.
Half a century ago, it was the era of the mainframe computer, with its air-conditioned room, twitching tape-drives, and appearance in the title of a spy novel Billion-Dollar Brain then made into a Hollywood film. Now we have the cloud, with server farms and the client–server model as quotidian: this text is being typed on a Chromebook. The term Applications Programming Interface or API is 50 years old, and refers to a type of software library as well as the interface to its use. While a compiler is what you need to get high-level code executed by a mainframe, an API out in the cloud somewhere offers a chance to perform operations on a remote server. For example, the multifarious bots active on Wikipedia have owners who exploit the MediaWiki API. APIs (called RESTful) that allow for the GET HTTP request are fundamental for what could colloquially be called "moving data around the Web"; from which Wikidata benefits 24/7. So the fact that the Wikidata SPARQL endpoint at query.wikidata.org has a RESTful API means that, in lay terms, Wikidata content can be GOT from it. The programming involved, besides the SPARQL language, could be in Python, younger by a few months than the Web. Magic words, such as occur in fantasy stories, are wishful (rather than RESTful) solutions to gaining access. You may need to be a linguist to enter Ali Baba's cave or the western door of Moria (French in the case of "Open Sesame", in fact, and Sindarin being the respective languages). Talking to an API requires a bigger toolkit, which first means you have to recognise the tools in terms of what they can do. On the way to the wikt:impactful or polymathic modern handling of facts, one must perhaps take only tactful notice of tech's endemic problem with documentation, and absorb the insightful point that the code in APIs does articulate the customary procedures now in place on the cloud for getting information. As Owl explained to Winnie-the-Pooh, it tells you The Thing to Do.
If you wish to receive no further issues of Facto Post, please remove your name from our mailing list. Alternatively, to opt out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page.
Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery |
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:45, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
May you join this month's editathons from WiR![edit]
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:17, 27 April 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Facto Post – Issue 23 – 30 April 2019[edit]
| Facto Post – Issue 23 – 30 April 2019
The Editor is Charles Matthews, for ContentMine. Please leave feedback for him, on his User talk page.
To subscribe to Facto Post go to Wikipedia:Facto Post mailing list. For the ways to unsubscribe, see the footer.
 Talk of cloud computing draws a veil over hardware, but also, less obviously but more importantly, obscures such intellectual distinction as matters most in its use. Wikidata begins to allow tasks to be undertaken that were out of easy reach. The facility should not be taken as the real point. Coming in from another angle, the "executive decision" is more glamorous; but the "administrative decision" should be admired for its command of facts. Think of the attitudes ad fontes, so prevalent here on Wikipedia as "can you give me a source for that?", and being prepared to deal with complicated analyses into specified subcases. Impatience expressed as a disdain for such pedantry is quite understandable, but neither dirty data nor false dichotomies are at all good to have around. Issue 13 and Issue 21, respectively on WP:MEDRS and systematic reviews, talk about biomedical literature and computing tasks that would be of higher quality if they could be made more "administrative". For example, it is desirable that the decisions involved be consistent, explicable, and reproducible by non-experts from specified inputs. What gets clouded out is not impossibly hard to understand. You do need to put together the insights of functional programming, which is a doctrinaire and purist but clearcut approach, with the practicality of office software. Loopless computation can be conceived of as a seamless forward march of spreadsheet columns, each determined by the content of previous ones. Very well: to do a backward audit, when now we are talking about Wikidata, we rely on integrity of data and its scrupulous sourcing: and clearcut case analyses. The MEDRS example forces attention on purge attempts such as Beall's list.
If you wish to receive no further issues of Facto Post, please remove your name from our mailing list. Alternatively, to opt out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page.
Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery |
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:27, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
Facto Post – Issue 24 – 17 May 2019[edit]
Facto Post – Issue 24 – 17 May 2019 The Editor is Charles Matthews, for ContentMine. Please leave feedback for him, on his User talk page.
To subscribe to Facto Post go to Wikipedia:Facto Post mailing list. For the ways to unsubscribe, see the footer.
Two dozen issues, and this may be the last, a valediction at least for a while. It's time for a two-year summation of ContentMine projects involving TDM (text and data mining). Wikidata and now Structured Data on Commons represent the overlap of Wikimedia with the Semantic Web. This common ground is helping to convert an engineering concept into a movement. TDM generally has little enough connection with the Semantic Web, being instead in the orbit of machine learning which is no respecter of the semantic. Don't break a taboo by asking bots "and what do you mean by that?" The ScienceSource project innovates in TDM, by storing its text mining results in a Wikibase site. It strives for compliance of its fact mining, on drug treatments of diseases, with an automated form of the relevant Wikipedia referencing guideline MEDRS. Where WikiFactMine set up an API for reuse of its results, ScienceSource has a SPARQL query service, with look-and-feel exactly that of Wikidata's at query.wikidata.org. It also now has a custom front end, and its content can be federated, in other words used in data mashups: it is one of over 50 sites that can federate with Wikidata. The human factor comes to bear through the front end, which combines a link to the HTML version of a paper, text mining results organised in drug and disease columns, and a SPARQL display of nearby drug and disease terms. Much software to develop and explain, so little time! Rather than telling the tale, Facto Post brings you ScienceSource links, starting from the how-to video, lower right.
The review tool requires a log in on sciencesource.wmflabs.org, and an OAuth permission (bottom of a review page) to operate. It can be used in simple and more advanced workflows. Examples of queries for the latter are at d:Wikidata_talk:ScienceSource project/Queries#SS_disease_list and d:Wikidata_talk:ScienceSource_project/Queries#NDF-RT issue. Please be aware that this is a research project in development, and may have outages for planned maintenance. That will apply for the next few days, at least. The ScienceSource wiki main page carries information on practical matters. Email is not enabled on the wiki: use site mail here to Charles Matthews in case of difficulty, or if you need support. Further explanatory videos will be put into commons:Category:ContentMine videos. If you wish to receive no further issues of Facto Post, please remove your name from our mailing list. Alternatively, to opt out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page.
Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery |
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:52, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
Books & Bytes, Issue 33[edit]
The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 33, March – April 2019
- #1Lib1Ref
- Wikimedia and Libraries User Group update
- Global branches update
- Bytes in brief
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:41, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
June events with WIR[edit]
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:42, 22 May 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
July events from Women in Red![edit]
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:40, 25 June 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Books & Bytes Issue 34, May – June 2019[edit]
The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 34, May – June 2019
- Partnerships
- #1Lib1Ref
- Wikimedia and Libraries User Group update
- Global branches update
- Bytes in brief
French version of Books & Bytes is now available on meta!
Read the full newsletter
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:20, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
August 2019 at Women in Red[edit]
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 06:44, 29 July 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
September 2019 at Women in Red[edit]
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 16:24, 27 August 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
October Events from Women in Red[edit]
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:35, 23 September 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Books & Bytes – Issue 35, July – August 2019[edit]
The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 35, July – August 2019
- Wikimania
- We're building something great, but..
- Wikimedia and Libraries User Group update
- A Wikibrarian's story
- Bytes in brief
On behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:58, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
November 2019 at Women in Red[edit]
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 22:58, 29 October 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Notice of subpage moved[edit]
Hello. This is a message to let you know that a subpage of your user page has been moved to User:HazelAB/The Message to the Planet (novel). This has been done since titles with consecutive apostrophes (for example, '' or ''') have been known to cause issues with wiki markup on pages if the page title is linked on other pages. Since the end of 2014, the creation of titles containing consecutive apostrophes has been restricted by Wikipedia's title creation blacklist. The page can now be found at User:HazelAB/The Message to the Planet (novel). Feel free to contact me with any questions regarding this. Thank you. Steel1943 (talk) 19:09, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
Notice of subpage moved (2)[edit]
Hello. This is a message to let you know that a subpage of your user page has been moved to User:HazelAB/The Unicorn (novel). This has been done since titles with consecutive apostrophes (for example, '' or ''') have been known to cause issues with wiki markup on pages if the page title is linked on other pages. Since the end of 2014, the creation of titles containing consecutive apostrophes has been restricted by Wikipedia's title creation blacklist. The page can now be found at User:HazelAB/The Unicorn (novel). Feel free to contact me with any questions regarding this. Thank you. Steel1943 (talk) 19:11, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]
 | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Books & Bytes – Issue 36[edit]
The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 36, September – October 2019
- #1Lib1Ref January 2020
- #1Lib1Ref 2019 stories and learnings
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:20, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
December events with WIR[edit]
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:43, 25 November 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
January 2020 at Women in Red[edit]
|
February with Women in Red[edit]
.jpg)
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 19:31, 28 January 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Books & Bytes – Issue 37[edit]
The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 37, November – December 2019
- #1Lib1Ref
- Wikimedia and Libraries User Group
On behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:10, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 17[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Caoimhín Ó Raghallaigh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gloaming (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:07, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
March 2020 at Women in Red[edit]
  Online events:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 19:32, 23 February 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Disambiguation link notification for March 10[edit]
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Brunswick News, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Daily Gleaner (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 16:16, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
April 2020 at Women in Red[edit]
Online events:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 14:59, 23 March 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Issue 38, January – April 2020[edit]
The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 38, January – April 2020
- New partnership
- Global roundup
On behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --15:57, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
May 2020 at Women in Red[edit]
Online events:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 20:58, 29 April 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
June 2020 at Women in Red[edit]
June 2020, Volume 6, Issue 6, Numbers 150, 151, 167, 168, 169
Online events:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 17:11, 25 May 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Books & Bytes – Issue 39, May – June 2020[edit]
The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 39, May – June 2020
- Library Card Platform
- New partnerships
- ProQuest
- Springer Nature
- BioOne
- CEEOL
- IWA Publishing
- ICE Publishing
- Bytes in brief
On behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:13, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
July 2020 at Women in Red[edit]
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 16:11, 28 June 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
August 2020 at Women in Red[edit]
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 18:50, 26 July 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
September Women in Red edithons[edit]
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:51, 29 August 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Books & Bytes – Issue 40[edit]
The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 40, July – August 2020
- New partnerships
- Al Manhal
- Ancestry
- RILM
- #1Lib1Ref May 2020 report
- AfLIA hires a Wikipedian-in-Residence
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --10:14, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
October editathons from Women in Red[edit]
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:10, 21 September 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
DYK for Paul Alexander[edit]
Hi, Hazel! Just so you know, the DYK for Paul Alexander is scheduled to go live on September 29-30. We get 24 hours nowadays! See here for the time frame. Enjoy! -- MelanieN (talk) 02:03, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
DYK for Paul Elias Alexander[edit]
On 30 September 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Paul Elias Alexander, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that as an advisor to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Paul Alexander tried unsuccessfully to tell Dr. Anthony Fauci what he could and could not say about the coronavirus? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Paul Elias Alexander. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Paul Elias Alexander), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
—valereee (talk) 00:02, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
November edit-a-thons from Women in Red[edit]
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:50, 28 October 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Books & Bytes – Issue 41[edit]
The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 41, September – October 2020
- New partnership: Taxmann
- WikiCite
- 1Lib1Ref 2021
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --10:47, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]
| Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
December with Women in Red[edit]
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:42, 26 November 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Disambiguation link notification for December 19[edit]
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Centennial Building (Fredericton), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page International style.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
A New Year With Women in Red![edit]
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 03:02, 29 December 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Books & Bytes - Issue 42[edit]
The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 42, November – December 2020
- New EBSCO collections now available
- 1Lib1Ref 2021 underway
- Library Card input requested
- Libraries love Wikimedia, too!
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --14:00, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
February 2021 at Women in Red[edit]
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 14:59, 27 January 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
DYK for Strax affair[edit]
On 31 January 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Strax affair, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Strax affair started in the library? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Strax affair. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Strax affair), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:02, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
February with Women in Red[edit]
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:10, 31 January 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Books & Bytes – Issue 48[edit]
The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 48, November – December 2021
- 1Lib1Ref 2022
- Wikipedia Library notifications deployed
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --15:12, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
March editathons[edit]
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:37, 27 February 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
April Editathons from Women in Red[edit]
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:44, 22 March 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Books & Bytes – Issue 49[edit]
The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 49, January – February 2022
- New library collections
- Blog post published detailing technical improvements
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --10:06, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
May Women in Red events[edit]
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:53, 30 April 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
June events from Women in Red[edit]
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 09:20, 31 May 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Books & Bytes – Issue 50[edit]
The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 50, March – April 2022
- New library partner - SPIE
- 1Lib1Ref May 2022 underway
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --12:52, 1 June 2022 (UTC) (UTC)
Women in Red in July 2022[edit]
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:47, 27 June 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red August 2022[edit]
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 10:58, 29 July 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Books & Bytes – Issue 51[edit]
The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 51, May – June 2022
- New library partners
- SAGE Journals
- Elsevier ScienceDirect
- University of Chicago Press
- Information Processing Society of Japan
- Feedback requested on this newsletter
- 1Lib1Ref May 2022
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --16:45, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
Women in Red in September 2022[edit]
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:36, 31 August 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red October 2022[edit]
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 14:59, 29 September 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Books & Bytes – Issue 52[edit]
The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 52, July – August 2022
- New instant-access collections:
- SpringerLink and Springer Nature
- Project MUSE
- Taylor & Francis
- ASHA
- Loeb
- Feedback requested on this newsletter
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --12:20, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
Women in Red November 2022[edit]
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 17:34, 26 October 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Books & Bytes – Issue 53[edit]
The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 53, September – October 2022
- New collections:
- Edward Elgar
- E-Yearbook
- Corriere della Serra
- Wikilala
- Collections moved to Library Bundle:
- Ancestry
- New feature: Outage notification
- Spotlight: Collections indexed in EDS
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --11:19, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
Women in Red in December 2022[edit]
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:54, 26 November 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:12, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Women in Red January 2023[edit]
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 18:02, 27 December 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
DYK for Tom Forrestall[edit]
On 21 January 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Tom Forrestall, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Canadian artist Tom Forrestall spent six months painting his own car? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Tom Forrestall. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Tom Forrestall), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
BorgQueen (talk) 00:03, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
Books & Bytes – Issue 54[edit]
The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 54, November – December 2022
- New collections:
- British Newspaper Archive
- Findmypast
- University of Michigan Press
- ACLS
- Duke University Press
- 1Lib1Ref 2023
- Spotlight: EDS Refine Results
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --14:14, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
Happy (belated) Twelfth First Edit Day![edit]
|
Hey, HazelAB. I'd like to wish you a wonderful First Edit Day on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! Chris Troutman (talk) 20:40, 26 January 2023 (UTC) |
|
Women in Red in February 2023[edit]
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:27, 30 January 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red March 2023[edit]
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 12:53, 26 February 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Books & Bytes – Issue 55[edit]
The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 55, January – February 2023
- New bundle partners:
- Newspapers.com
- Fold3
- 1Lib1Ref January report
- Spotlight: EDS SmartText Searching
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --12:45, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
Women in Red April 2023[edit]
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:52, 27 March 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red May 2023[edit]
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 18:28, 27 April 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Books & Bytes – Issue 56[edit]
The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 56, March – April 2023
- New partner:
- Perlego
- Library access tips and tricks
- Spotlight: EveryBookItsReader
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --10:03, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
Women in Red - June 2023[edit]
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 09:15, 28 May 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red July 2023[edit]
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:43, 27 June 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red 8th Anniversary[edit]
|
|
Women in Red 8th Anniversary |
| In July 2015 around 15.5% of the English Wikipedia's biographies were about women. As of July 2023, 19.61% of the English Wikipedia's biographies are about women. That's a lot of biographies created in the effort to close the gender gap. Happy 8th Anniversary! Join us for some virtual cake and add comments or memories and please keep on editing to close the gap! |
--Lajmmoore (talk) 11:01, 18 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Books & Bytes – Issue 57[edit]
The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 57, May – June 2023
- Suggestion improvements
- Favorite collections tips
- Spotlight: Promoting Nigerian Books and Authors
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --11:22, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
Women in Red August 2023[edit]
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 19:25, 28 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
September 2023 at Women in Red[edit]
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Victuallers (talk) 16:54, 25 August 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Books & Bytes – Issue 58[edit]
The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 58, July – August 2023
- New partners - De Standaard and Duncker & Humblot
- Tech tip: Filters
- Wikimania presentation
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --14:27, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 27[edit]
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Violet Gillett, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charles Best.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
Women in Red October 2023[edit]
See also
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 10:53, 29 September 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red - November 2023[edit]
See also Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 08:22, 26 October 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Books & Bytes – Issue 59[edit]
The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 59, September – October 2023
- Spotlight: Introducing a repository of anti-disinformation projects
- Tech tip: Library access methods
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --16:15, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
Women in Red December 2023[edit]
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:23, 27 November 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Women in Red January 2024[edit]
Announcement
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:17, 28 December 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Books & Bytes – Issue 60[edit]
The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 60, November – December 2023
- Three new partners
- Google Scholar integration
- How to track partner suggestions
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --13:36, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
Happy First Edit Day![edit]
 | Happy First Edit Day! Hi HazelAB! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of the day you made your first edit and became a Wikipedian! The Herald (Benison) (talk) 02:42, 25 January 2024 (UTC) |  |
Women in Red February 2024[edit]
Announcement
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 20:09, 28 January 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red March 2024[edit]
Announcements
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 20:22, 25 February 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Books & Bytes – Issue 61[edit]
The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 61, January – February 2024
- Bristol University Press and British Online Archives now available
- 1Lib1Ref results
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --16:32, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
Precious anniversary[edit]
| |
| Nine years! |
|---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:33, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Women in Red April 2024[edit]
Announcements
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 19:42, 30 March 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Books & Bytes – Issue 62[edit]
The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 62, March – April 2024
- IEEE and Haaretz now available
- Let's Connect Clinics about The Wikipedia Library
- Spotlight and Wikipedia Library tips
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --11:02, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Women in Red May 2024[edit]
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 06:17, 28 April 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging