User talk:HeWhoE

Welcome!

Hello, HeWhoE, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

Orphaned non-free media (File:Inger Nilsson.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Inger Nilsson.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:14, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:CeltX version 2.7.png

Thanks for uploading File:CeltX version 2.7.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 08:06, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

i really liked your pic of libreoffice writer that u put into the article, thanks for that, do u have one of libreoffice calc? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 123465421jhytwretpo98721654 (talk • contribs) 02:50, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No sweat! I can make a screenshot of LibreOffice Calc too. I'll try to remember to upload it tomorrow -- err, later today (it's already kinda tomorrow).HeWhoE (talk) 10:47, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Trisquel

Thanks for your contribution to this article, but by longstanding consensus operating systems that use the Linux kernel are called "Linux" on Wikipedia. "GNU/Linux" is considered a minority POV term used by the FSF and its supporters. The term is only used to describe distros when the distro itself is called "GNU/Linux" and then only when referring to the distro itself. If you want to change this consensus then the way to go about is not by trying to insert the term GNU/Linux into articles on distributions, such as on Trisquel. You should read Talk:Linux including all the archives of that page, to get the history of the problem as well as Talk:Linux/Name as this is where past consensuses have been formed. You will also want to read GNU/Linux naming controversy and its talk page as background as well. When you have the history of the consensus read then you can present your case at Talk:Linux to try to convince the other editors that all references "Linux" other than to the kernel itself in Wikipedia should be changed to "GNU/Linux". - Ahunt (talk) 00:49, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/HeWhoE for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. - Sudo Ghost 05:31, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You're on record for FSF POV edit-warring. Don't start it again. Yworo (talk) 13:45, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Linux, etc

Please see the discussion at Talk:LibreOffice#Linux vs GNU/Linux. The same applies at the GIMP article. Walter Görlitz (talk) 23:37, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

January 2014

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on GIMP. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Codename Lisa (talk) 13:55, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Travelers 3

The article Travelers 3 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:NBAND, no indication of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rusf10 (talk) 04:05, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]