User talk:Hello2India

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Sockpuppet investigation[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hello2India (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Dear Sit i apologize, sir for your previous activity, due to lack of knowledge i have done. request you please unblock domain khojinindia.com

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yunshui  23:27, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

UTRS 30411 and unblock decline[edit]

UTRS 30411 I'm sorry, as you have access to your talk page, I cannot unblock you. As this is a sockpuppetry block, you should appeal at your original account. Also, you will not be allowed to edit about or link to KHOJinINDIA. --Deep fried okra User talk:Deepfriedokra 01:59, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Third unblock request[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hello2India (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Dear Sir i apologize for my mistake as i told you due to lack of knowledge it was happen and about Durdana786 account it was made by my previous employee and right now am not able to contact with him... am totally helpless please do something for this — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hello2India (talkcontribs) 17:46, 7 May 2020 (UTC) : No sir i read all the wikiguideline i can only edit or link KHOJinINDIA with authentic reason — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hello2India (talkcontribs) 18:40, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Here are a few reasons for declining your request. Any one of them would have been sufficient reason. (1) Your only purpose here is to use Wikipedia for promotion. (2) This account is a sockpuppet, created for the purpose of evading blocks on one or more other accounts. (3) You are blatantly and obviously lying about that, so we can't trust you for the future. (4) You clearly don't understand the reasons for being blocked, and every indication is that if unblocked you would continue the same kind of unacceptable editing as before. JBW (talk) 21:52, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

(Non-administrator comment) Hello2India, do you plan to edit about or link to KHOJinINDIA? Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 18:30, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
You cannot edit about or link to KHOJinINDIA, regardless of your reasons. Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 18:58, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You are not permitted to remove declined unblock requests for your currently active block. --Yamla (talk) 18:33, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Gah. I don't know how else to say this. You will not be unblocked to edit about or link to KHOJinINDIA or Navneet Chauhan, or any other subject with which you have an outside connection. RE: "my previous employee". Maybe this has already discussed, but please read and heed WP:COI and WP:PAID. As this is a sockpuppetry block, I think the earliest you could be considered for unblocking would be six months from now under the WP:standard offer. That means no editing with this account or any other or not logged in for 6 months and without requesting an unblock. No editing till November 7. At that time you will need to tell us what constructive edits you would make. --Deep fried okra User talk:Deepfriedokra 19:42, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
permalink to removed declines --Deep fried okra User talk:Deepfriedokra 19:42, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If user attempts another request at UTRS, I will ask that that venue be closed to them till 6 months after last edit. --Deep fried okra User talk:Deepfriedokra 19:45, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
(Non-administrator comment) The sock themselves placed the second {{unblock reviewed}} in Special:Diff/955138964. Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 20:31, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Rotideypoc41352: How... unusual. Thanks. --Deep fried okra User talk:Deepfriedokra 22:07, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page access[edit]

You were warned. You continued to remove declined unblock requests for your currently active block, after being told pretty clearly you can't do that. As you are continuing to abuse Wikipedia, I have revoked talk page access. --Yamla (talk) 19:56, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You are now not eligible for unblock consideration under WP:SO until 2020-12-18 at the earliest. --Yamla (talk) 19:57, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Stop hand
Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.