User talk:Helosix
Speedy deletion of Sigsaly transmissions
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/1/15/Ambox_warning_pn.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_pn.svg.png)
A tag has been placed on Sigsaly transmissions requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}}
to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Waterden (talk) 21:53, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
Hi. Speedy deletion means what it says. You need to provide evidence for the significance of the company if you don't want this to happen again. Please read Wikipedia:Notability for further guidance. I suggest you also read Wikipedia:Conflict of interest and Wikipedia:Spam just to be on the safe side. Deb (talk) 22:33, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Sigsaly Transmissions
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/1/15/Ambox_warning_pn.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_pn.svg.png)
A tag has been placed on Sigsaly Transmissions requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}}
to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Waterden (talk) 00:27, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
Sigsaly Transmissions
[edit]Hello. The article has no reliable third party sources, it also goes against Wikipedia:Conflict of interest and is against WP:spam. Please also read WP:OtherStuffExists as it may help. I have looked for other sources via google to try and save the article but as I could not find any more I have added a speedy deletion tag. You may know where to look more than me but there are syill concerns as stated previously regarding conflict of interest and advertising. Hope that helps.Waterden (talk) 00:39, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
Hi. See the articles listed in the External links area, there are listed at least two third-party sources. Maybe they are added in the wrong place? thanks Helosix (talk) 00:42, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
Here are the 3rd party articles -
http://www.actionagainsthunger.org/get-involved/friends/face-music
http://prod1.cmj.com/articles/display_article.php?id=68547526
Helosix (talk) 00:45, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
- The sources are not particlularly reliable in themselves. Sorry to put another link but you do need to have read really. See WP:RS. I have to go offline now, alomost 2.00am here but I'll see what else I can dig up tomorrow but in the meantime look for more established sources. Goodnight.Waterden (talk) 00:49, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
- Good morning... here are a few other 3rd party ref's:
http://www.regenmag.com/News-3642-Machines-Against-Hunger.html http://www.ebm.gr/content/view/2952/2/ http://www.chaindlk.com/reviews/index.php?search=wynardtage&type=music thanks! Helosix (talk) 01:21, 18 October 2008 (UTC)