User talk:Helpthepeople9

This user talk page might be watched by friendly talk page stalkers, which means that someone other than me might reply to your query. Their input is welcome and their help with messages that I cannot reply to quickly is appreciated.

Welcome!

Welcome to my talk page, feel free to write me any concerns here.

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.

— Wug·a·po·des 02:37, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for sockpuppetry. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 20:36, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Helpthepeople9 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was in no way responsible for this, I believe my sister has logged onto our shared computer and created an account for abusing. I will make sure that it does not happen again. Helpthepeople9 chat? 20:58, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because I have Confirmed that you have been evading the block as Xizii (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki). Additionally, as mentioned below, the explanation that a sibling was sharing the connection is ordinarily considered unconvincing. Mz7 (talk) 07:58, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please explain Special:Diff/986896145 and Special:Diff/987222812 in the context of Special:AbuseLog/28289367. Assuming that I ignore that you're using the oldest excuse in the book, you need to disclose all the accounts you have used before I consider unblocking you. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 21:19, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, thank you for reading my appeal. The first edit I made on my Userpage that said "This is an alt account for multiple accounts" has given me some trouble before. I made that edit before I familiarized myself with the sockpuppetry rules. I was going to have a few accounts so I could edit if I got blocked for whatever reason. I understand that this is not acceptable and will never use those other accounts. The second edit that said "i like them cut g" is an internet meme and the name of one of those other accounts. I promise, truly, that I will only edit with this account and that this account will only be used for goodness. Helpthepeople9 chat? 21:28, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You asked for me to say all accounts I have used: This account, Helpthepeople9- Helpthepeople9alt- Ilikethemcutg- Theyneedtobestoped I think that is all of them, let me know if you believe I have missed one. Helpthepeople9 chat? 21:44, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

From my very first check - you have missed multiple accounts. SQL ^{Query me!} 03:41, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Do any of these ring any bells? Theweekendfan101, Sksksksksksksksksksk (Attempted account creation), Chortalianroyal1, Quiksandi. There's also possibly logged-out editing, and I haven't really dug that far into this yet, there are more accounts that I'm not yet sure on. SQL ^{Query me!} 03:48, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Additionally, please see WP:LITTLEBROTHER, and WP:COMPROMISED. Generally, we don't unblock accounts in these circumstances. SQL ^{Query me!} 03:51, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am telling you, I am not trying to avoid being blocked with an excuse. This is a shared ip and my sister got on, but only for the 'Theweekendfan101' account. After I confronted her, I learned the 'Sksksksksksksksksksk' one was the same as Theweekendfan101. Quiksandi was the legitamate account I used before I made this one. And I have never heard of Chortalianroyal1 and don't know how my ip is related to it. Just please- unblock me for like a 1 week period and see that I only use this account and that I do not vandalise with it. I have changed my ways from when I made multiple accounts back in November, and I would like to continue editing. Helpthepeople9 chat? 15:09, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

How come you didn't mention Quiksandi before when you were asked? SQL ^{Query me!} 02:26, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't believe that account was related to this, it was an account that was perfectly reasonable and not against any rules. Helpthepeople9 chat? 03:31, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure I follow. NinjaRobotPirate asked: "you need to disclose all the accounts you have used before I consider unblocking you" (emphasis mine). There wasn't really a whole lot of room left there for interpretation. Are there other accounts that you don't believe to be related to this? SQL ^{Query me!} 03:37, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No- just that one. I understand that no alt accounts are allowed, and I have learned from my mistakes and hope that I may have a second chance. Helpthepeople9 chat? 03:57, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welp- thank you for reviewing my block and I just want to say that I am sorry for my actions. Goodbye wikipedia, Helpthepeople9 chat? 00:39, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Mz7: Hello, I understand that I am no longer allowed to edit Wikipedia. May I create a new account for the SOLE purpose of reading Wikipedia? I want one with a fresh start. I will disclose all info about the account and if you see that I edit anything but my userpage or talk page you can ban the account. Thanks, Helpthepeople9 chat? 02:00, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An account is not needed to read wikipedia. This can even be done with your current, blocked account. Please do not create any further accounts. SQL ^{Query me!} 02:03, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Alright. Helpthepeople9 chat? 02:03, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@SQL: Is there any way in the world that I may edit Wikipedia again? I truly just want another chance to prove myslef. Helpthepeople9 chat? 02:08, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I would say, look at WP:Standard Offer. What Standard offer does not mean is "just wait 6 months and we'll unblock you". Actually read the page.

The best chance I can think of would be to take that six months to edit a sister project productively. Could be the simple english wikipedia, could be another language wikipedia - could be wikiquote, or wikisource, or wiktionary. This is where you can prove that you can function in a collaborative environment. Do not create more sockpuppets here.

After 6 months of contributing positively elsewhere - make an unblock request that explains this, and honestly addresses the reason that you were blocked.

I can't promise an unblock in these circumstances, but this is something I've seen work before.

I hope that this helps. SQL ^{Query me!} 02:15, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I am going to try that out. Helpthepeople9 chat? 02:17, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Helpthepeople9 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Last night, when I was going to sleep, I was thinking to myself how much of a mistake I made when I made a few sockpuppet accounts. For months, I have regretted what I did and wished I could return to Wikipedia. I came back to my talk page and read everything on it and decided that I would try to appeal my block. I know that it has not been six months, but I truly believe that I have learned from my mistakes and won't grief any wiki or make any sockpuppet accounts. Over the last (roughly) 4.5 months, I have not made any sockpuppets and make the occaisonal positive edit to the Simple English Wikipedia. If I can be unblocked, I would hope that I can create a new account and start over from there making constructive edits to the Wiki. That would be my sole account from then on, and I will disclose all info about it to anyone who asks so they can prove I don't vandalize anymore. Thank you. Helpthepeople9 chat? 01:02, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

In view of your undertaking to do differently in future, and the comments below, I am willing to give you another chance. I hope from now on you can get on with contributing without similar problems again. JBW (talk) 10:00, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:SQL, NinjaRobotPirate, Mz7, I don't know if you all want to shut this down or not because it hasn't been six months, but this is just to say that I have eaten the plums that were in the icebox, and that I have no idea if the range here, which I blocked a few months ago, has anything to do with this editor. Drmies (talk) 01:08, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Helpthepeople9, whatever happens here, I'm going to have to ask you to change that signature: I can't read it. The colors and contrast are problematic, and the script makes it nearly impossible--and my eyes aren't even that old. Please see WP:SIGAPP. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 14:50, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I changed my signature back to the default one, thank you for letting me know that it is problematic. Helpthepeople9 (talk) 17:06, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am not exactly sure what you mean. Helpthepeople9 chat? 01:15, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I think I get it. I googled my IP address and then found the contributions for it, and it said that you blocked it in April. You blocked a range of IPs, and I looked at the edits made by that range (75.166.128.0/19) and I did not recognize any of the edits. This could possibly be another user editing within the same IP range? Helpthepeople9 chat? 01:34, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Drmies: I took a look, and given the specific technical data, I'm inclined to say that Helpthepeople9 is not related to the reason why you blocked that range. I ran a few other checks, but I wasn't able to find conclusive evidence of any block evasion by this user in the last 3 months. At this time, I have no views on whether the unblock request should be accepted or declined—in any case, since I handled the previous unblock request, I'll defer the actual decision to another admin. Mz7 (talk) 03:08, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I don't really care that much if someone unblocks you, but I think you'd probably be happier posting trollish comments on Reddit or something. I haven't looked at the CU data, but if you guys are talking about 75.166.128.0/19, that's someone who's gone to college (see Special:Diff/1016751205: "her essay presupposes its existence and presents it as pure conjecture"). Children who vandalize and post idiotic memes don't talk like that. They say idiocy like "i like them cut g". NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:59, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I don't want to troll anymore, my ways have changed and I am here to help the Wiki and not troll it anymore. Helpthepeople9 chat? 17:01, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The checkuser policy says "Administrators must not undo nor loosen any block that is specifically called a "CheckUser block" without first consulting a CheckUser or the Arbitration Committee". Well, the checkuser who placed the block has said "I don't really care that much if someone unblocks you", and two other checkusers have commented here, and not indicated that they have any objections to unblocking, one of them explicitly saying "I have no views on whether the unblock request should be accepted or declined". I reckon that's enough consultation of checkusers for me to make a decision on this, and my decision is to give the editor another chance. JBW (talk) 09:55, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, I have learned from my mistakes and will not do anything that would warrant another block or anything like that. I have decided to start over in a new account with a fresh start, the name of the account is Koriaan. This is the one account that I am going to use, no other accounts are being used. Best regards, Helpthepeople9 (talk) 16:05, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]