User talk:Heonsi
if you wish to appeal your ban, contact WP:BASC by email. 19:36, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
|
---|
ein tvai drai........ Someone has attempted to revert your edits at East Germany, please join the discussion at the East Germany article[edit]The user Mewulwe has reverted your edits, I considered the reversion flawed and reverted his. There is debate about whether it is accurate or biased to state that East Germany was a satellite state of the Soviet Union. I have found a vast array of sources that say that it was a satellite state, but two users are refusing to accept these claims. Please enter the discussion on the issue of satellite state status of East Germany at Talk:East Germany.--R-41 (talk) 17:11, 9 January 2012 (UTC) The Nazi Party emblem is real, it is called the "Partei-Abzeichen"[edit]Here are photographs from an official Nazi Party book that shows the symbol, "Partei-Abzeichen" it can be seen in colour and in black-and-white on two pages in the following source see here: [1].--R-41 (talk) 14:12, 14 January 2012 (UTC) Nomination of 2012 Bangladesh uprising for deletion[edit]![]() The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2012 Bangladesh uprising until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Basalisk inspect damage⁄berate 18:59, 19 January 2012 (UTC) Mewulwe[edit]He/she can remove things from their talk page if they wish. Please don't revert. – Connormah (talk) 03:16, 22 January 2012 (UTC) January 2012[edit]![]() If you wish to avoid being blocked, instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. You may still be blocked for edit warring even if you do not exceed the technical limit of the three-revert rule if your behavior indicates that you intend to continue to revert repeatedly. JOJ Hutton 14:33, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
![]() ![]() please unblock me , give me another chance[edit]![]() Heonsi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log)) Request reason: well yes am a sockpuppet of chaosname but i still want to edit wikipedia so plase unblock me and lol Decline reason: We generally don't unblock sock accounts, and your "lol" at the end of the request certainly doesn't inspire me to make an exception in this case... I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:30, 22 January 2012 (UTC) If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. |