User talk:Heron/2014

MfD nomination of Wikipedia:TLAs from AAA to DZZ

Wikipedia:TLAs from AAA to DZZ, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:TLAs from AAA to DZZ and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:TLAs from AAA to DZZ during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Quest for Truth (talk) 20:51, 18 January 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	It was a pretty good article you wrote about (Mersa Gawasis). I wish you will continue your hard work. Hashima20 (talk) 22:57, 2 August 2014 (UTC)

Much appreciated, thank you! And I will keep up the hard work. --Heron (talk) 17:18, 3 August 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Archimedes paradox

The article Archimedes paradox has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Thank you Heron for the alert at Talk:Archimedes paradox#What is this paradox actually called? showing that you found the title vacuous. A hoax like this makes our project look inept, until an effort like yours uncovers a slick piece of vandalism,Rgdboer (talk) 01:54, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

I'm happy with the proposed deletion, so I don't think I need to do anything else. The longer this article remains, the greater the danger that Wikipedia will be quoted as the source of a made-up phrase, 'Archimedes paradox', that is not in common use elsewhere. --Heron (talk) 14:14, 22 November 2014 (UTC)