User talk:Herrbartlet

May 2016[edit]

Hello, I'm General Ization. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Minnie Driver has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. General Ization ^Talk 21:04, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Minnie Driver. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been or will be undone. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. General Ization ^Talk 21:08, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Minnie Driver. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 22:02, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Minnie Driver shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 22:05, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not restore this data. First, we rarely include hospital of birth data unless the case can be made for its relevance, and its street is utterly irrelevant; second, Driver herself says the data in the article now is sufficient. Further, you are continuing an edit war, which may get you blocked from editing. 🖖ATinySliver/^ATalkPage 23:09, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]