Jump to content

User talk:Heubergen

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]
Hello, Heubergen! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Randykitty (talk) 22:44, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Tegan Marie

[edit]

It's not a matter of whether she's actually notable. The deleted versions were all purely promotional and sourced only to her own website with nothing independent to support the claims made. The repeated spamming led to protection for the draft and article spaces. The drafts were created by User:Tegan Marie, and later by an obvious sock puppet posting the same nonsense.

I'm a little concerned why a new user should want to take on this article, and I have to ask if you have any conflict of interest; if so, you must declare it. That's particularly the case if you work for her or an associated organisation. Note that editing with a COI is discouraged, but permitted as long as it is declared. Concealing a COI can lead to a block. Please do not edit further until you respond to this message.

Also read the following regarding writing an article

  • you must provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that she meets the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to her or an affiliated organisation, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what she claims or interviewing her. Note that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls. I note, for example, that this ref you suggested is just a promo for forthcoming tour with no other content, and this is self-written, also a promo, and the Washington Post is an interview with her manager
  • you must write in a non-promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic.
  • there shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections.
  • you must not copy text from elsewhere. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. We require that text posted here can be used, modified and distributed for any purpose, including commercial; text is considered to be copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient.

I don't think you have the experience to tackle this, so I'm not going to unprotect, if you still wish to try, do so in a user sandbox and let me know when you think it's fit for purpose.

Before attempting to write a sandbox version, please make sure that she meets the notability criteria linked above, and check that you can find independent third party sources. Also read Your first article and WP:BLP. You must also reply to the COI request above Jimfbleak - talk to me? 07:03, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Answered on the talk page of the user. Heubergen (talk) 11:47, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for clarification, I did think you seemed too competent for a new user, which prompted the COI request. In the circumstances I've unprotected Draft:Tegan Marie for now and added it to my watchlist. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 12:06, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tegan Marie (March 30)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
DGG ( talk ) 00:22, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Heubergen! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DGG ( talk ) 00:22, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tegan Marie (April 15)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
AngusWOOF (barksniff) 21:35, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tegan Marie has been accepted

[edit]
Tegan Marie, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

AngusWOOF (barksniff) 17:28, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Caylee Hammack

[edit]

Hello, Thank you for your message. The first rating was based on an assumption that the ratings for the other projects were correct. It is obviously close to being a B class article; if it had a picture of the performer a B rating would be justified.--Johnsoniensis (talk) 19:02, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Great, thanks! --Heubergen (talk) 19:09, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]